Contingent valuation method: from the observation to the construction of preservation values;La méthode d'évaluation contingente: De l'observation à la construction des valeurs de préservation

Natures Sciences Societes

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 6-22

  Willinger, Marc ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LOUIS PASTEUR   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038031759     PISSN: 12401307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/nss/19960401006     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bishop R., Heberlein T. (1979). Measuring values of extramarkets goods : are indirect measures biased ?, American journal of agricultural economics, 61, 926-930.
2. Bonnieux F., Vermesch F. (1993). Bénéfices et coûts de la protection de l'eau : application de l'approche contingente à la pêche sportive, Revue d'Économie Politique, 103, 131-152.
3. Brookshire D., Coursey D. (1987). Measuring the value of a public good : an empirical comparison of elidtation procedures, American Economic Review, 77, 554-566.
4. Carson R. etal. (1994). A bibliograpny of Contingent valuation studies and papers, Natural Resources Damage Assessment, Inc., la Jolla, California, 1994.
5. Ciriacy-Wantrup S. (1947). Capital returns from soil-conservation practices, Journal of Farm Economics, 29, 1181-1196.
6. Coursey D., Hovis J., Schulze W. (1987). The disparity between willingness to accept and willingness to pay measures of value, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 679-690.
7. Cummings R., Harrison G., Rustrom E. (1995). Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys : is the dichotomous choice approach incentive-compatible, American Economic Review, 85, 1, 260-266.
8. Cummings R., Brookshire D., Schultze W. (1986). Valuing environmental goods : an assessment of the contingent valuation method, Rowman & Allenheld Totowa, NJ.
9. Davis R. (1963). The value of outdoor recreation: an economic study of the Maine Woods, PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
10. Delquie P. (1993). Inconsistent trade-offs between attributes: new evidence in preference assessment biases, Management Science, 39, 1382-1395.
11. Desaigues B., Lesgards V. (1992). L'évaluation contingente des actifs naturels : un exemple d'application. Revue d'Économie Politique, 102, 1, 100-122.
12. Devousges W., Johnson R., Dunford R., Boyle K., Hudson S., Wilson K. (1993). Measuring natural resource damages with contingent valuation : tests of valididity and reliability, Contingent valuation : a critical assessment, J.A. Hausman (Ed.). North-Holland, 1993, 91-159.
13. Diamond P., Hausman J. (1993). On contingent valuation measurement of nonuse values. Contingent valuation : a critical assessment, J.A. Hausman (Ed.). North-Holland, 3-38.
14. Diamond P., Hausman J. (1994). Contingent valuation : is some number better than no number?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 45-64.
15. Diamond P., Hausman J., Leonard G., Denning M. (1993). Does contingent valuation measure preference ? Experimental evidence, Contingent valuation : a critical assessment, J.A. Hausman (Ed.). North-Holland, 41-85.
16. Freeman M. III (1979). The benefits of environmental improvement. John Hopkins University PressBaltimore, MC, 1979.
17. Freeman M. III (1993). The measurement of environmental and resource values : theory and methods, Resources for the Future, Washington.
18. Hanemann M. (1994). Valuing the Environment through contingent valuation, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 19-43.
19. Hanemann M. (1991). Willingness to pay and willingness to accept : how much can they differ, American Economic Review, 81, 3, 635-647.
20. Hausman J. (1993). Contingent valuation : a critical assessment, J.A. Hausman (Ed.). North-Holland.
21. Hershey J., Kunreuther H., Schoemaker P. (1982). Sources of bias in assessment procedures for utility functions, Management Science, 28, 936-954.
22. Hershey J., Schoemaker P. (1985). Probability versus certainty equivalence methods in utility measurement : are they equivalent?, Management Science, 31, 1213-1231.
23. Johnson E., Schkade D. (1989). Bias in utility assessments : further evidence and explanations, Management Science, 35, 1213-1231.
24. Kahneman D., Knetsch J. (1992). Valuing public goods : the purchase of moral satisfaction, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22, 57-70.
25. Keser C (1995). Voluntary contribution to a public good when partial contribution is a dominant strategy, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Economic series n°3, 1995.
26. Kim O., Walker M. (1984). The free rider problem : experimental evidence. Public Choice, 43, 3-24.
27. Knetsch J. L., Sinden J. A. (1984). Willingness to pay and compensation demanded : experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99, 507-521.
28. Krutilla J. (1967). Conservation Reconsidered, American Economic Review, 57, 787-796.
29. Marwell G., Ames R. (1981). Economists free ride, does anyone else?, Journal of Public Economics, 15, 295-310.
30. Milgrom P. (1993). Is sympathy an economic value ? Philosophy, economics and the contingent valuation method, Contingent valuation : a critical assessment, J.A. Hausman (Ed.). Elsevier Science Publishers, 417-435.
31. Mitchell R., Carson R. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods : the contingent valuation method, Resources for the future.Washington DC.
32. Navrud S. (1992). Pricing the European Environment, Scandinavian University Press.
33. e édition, 1990.
34. Pommerenhe W.W., Schneider F. & Zweifel P. (1982). Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon : a reexamination, American Economic Review, 72, 569-74.
35. Portney P. (1994). The contingent valuation debate : why economists should care, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 3-17.
36. Randall A., Stoll J. (1980). Consumer's surplus in commodity space, American Economic Review, 71, 449-457.
37. Schkade D., Payne J. (1994). How people respond to contingent valuation questions : a verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation, Journal for Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 88-109.
38. Schneider F., Pommerehne W. (1981). Free riding and collective action : an experiment in public microeconomics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 689-704.
39. Schultze W., Cummings R., Brookshire D., Thayer M., Withworth R., Rahmatian M. (1983). Methods development in measuring benefits of environmental commodities, vol. 2, draft manuscript of a report to the office of policy analysis and resource management, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1983.
40. Seip K., Strand J. (1992). Willinness to pay for environmental goods in Norway : a contingent valuation study with real payments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2, 91-106.
41. Stenger A., Willinger M. (1995). Preservation value for groundwater quality in a large aquifer: a contingent valuation study of the Alsatian aquifer, Sixth Annual Meeting of the European Association of Environmental Resource Economists (EAERE). Umea University, Umea, Suède, June 17-201995.
42. Thaler R. (1980). Towards a positive theory of consumer choice, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60.
43. Weisbrod B. (1964). Collective consumption services of individual consumption goods, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 78, 3, 471-477.
44. Willig R. (1976). Consumer's surplus without apology, American economic review, 66.