Juvenile dispersal and habitat selectivity in the megapode alectura lathami (australian brush-turkey)

Wildlife Research

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 69-74

  Göth, Ann ^a   Vogel, Uwe ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTELEMETRY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; HABITAT USE; NATAL DISPERSAL; VEGETATION STRUCTURE;

AUSTRALIA;

ALECTURA LATHAMI; AVES; GALLUS GALLUS; LANTANA; LANTANA CAMARA; MEGAPODIIDAE; MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO; RUBUS; RUBUS GLAUCUS;

EID: 0038030659     PISSN: 10353712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/WR01053     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Arcese, P. (1989). Intrasexual competition, mating system, and natal dispersal in song sparrows. Animal Behaviour 38, 958-979.
2. Benshemesh, J. (1992). The conservation ecology of malleefowl, with particular regard to fire. Ph.D. Thesis, Monash University, Melbourne.
3. Dekker, R. W. R. J., Fuller, R. A., and Baker, G. C. (Eds) (2000). 'Megapodes. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan 2000-2004.' (WPA/Bird Life/SSC Megapode Specialist Group. IUCN: Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, and the World Pheasant Association: Reading, UK.)
4. Elton, C. (1939). On the nature of cover. Journal of Wildlife Management 3, 332-338.
5. Erikstad, K. E. (1985). Growth and survival of willow grouse chicks in relation to home range size, brood movements and habitat selection. Ornis Scandinavica 16, 181-190.
6. Godfrey, G. A. (1975). Home range characteristics of ruffed grouse broods in Minnesota. Journal of Wildlife Management 39, 287-298.
7. Göth, A. (2001). Survival, habitat selectivity and behavioural development of Australian brush-turkey Alectura lathami chicks. Ph.D. Thesis, Griffith University, Brisbane.
8. Göth, A., and Jones, D. (2001). Transmitter attachment and its effects on Australian brush-turkey hatchlings. Wildlife Research 28, 73-78.
9. Göth, A., and Vogel, U. (2002). Chick survival in the megapode Alectura lathami (Australian brush-turkey). Wildlife Research 29, 503-511.
10. Hengeveld, R. (1994). Small step invasion research. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9, 339-342.
11. Jones, D. N. (1999). What we don't know about megapodes. In 'Proceedings of the Third International Megapode Symposium, Nhill, Australia, December 1997'. (Eds R. W. R. J. Dekker, D. N. Jones and J. Benshemesh.) pp. 159-168. (Zoologische Verhandelingen: Leiden.)
12. Jones, D. N., Dekker, R. W. R. J., and Roselaar, C. S. (1995). 'The Megapodes.' (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)
13. MacDonald, D. W., and Amlaner, C. J. Jr (1980). A practical guide to radio tracking. In 'A Handbook on Biotelemetry and Radio Tracking'. (Eds C. J. Amlaner Jr and D. W. MacDonald.) pp. 143-159. (Pergamon Press: Oxford.)
14. Mühlenberg, M. (1989). 'Freilandökologie.' (Quelle und Meyer: Heidelberg.)
15. Mysterud, A., and Ostbye, E. (1999). Cover as a habitat element for temperature ungulates: effects on habitat selection and demography. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27, 385-394.
16. Neigel, J. E., and Avise, J. C. (1993). Application of a random walk to geographic distributions of animal mitochondrial DNA variation. Genetics 135, 1209-1220.
17. Nelson, M. E. (1993). Natal dispersal and gene flow in white-tailed deer in northeastern Minnesota. Journal of Mammalogy 74, 316-322.
18. Riley, T. Z., Clark, W. R., Ewing, D. E., and Vohs, P. A. (1998). Survival of ring-necked pheasant chicks during brood rearing. Journal of Wildlife Management 62, 36-44.
19. Sutherland, G. D., Harestad, A. S., Price, K., and Lertzman, K. P. (2000). Scaling of natal dispersal distances in terrestrial birds and mammals. Conservation Ecology 4: 16. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss1/art16
20. Swihart, R. K., and Slade, N. A. (1985). Testing for independence of observations in animal movements. Ecology 66, 1176-1184.
21. Taborsky, B., and Taborsky, M. (1991). Social organization of North island brown kiwi: long-term pairs and three types of male spacing behaviour. Ethology 89, 447-462.
22. Thomas, D. L., and Taylor, E. J. (1990). Study designs and tests for comparing resource use and availability. Journal of Wildlife Management 54, 322-330.