Benefit-cost analysis of vaccination and preemptive slaughter as a means of eradicating foot-and-mouth disease

American Journal of Veterinary Research

Volumn 64, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 805-812

  Bates, Thomas W ^a,b   Carpenter, Tim E ^a   Thurmond, Mark C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VACCINE;

ACTIVE IMMUNIZATION; AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; ANIMAL HOUSING; ARTICLE; CONTROL STRATEGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DAIRY CATTLE; DISINFECTION; DRUG EFFICACY; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS; INFECTION CONTROL; LIVESTOCK; NONHUMAN; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES; VACCINATION; VIRUS TRANSMISSION;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; COMMUNICABLE DISEASE CONTROL; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DISEASE OUTBREAKS; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS; GOAT DISEASES; GOATS; SHEEP DISEASES; SHEEP, DOMESTIC; SWINE; SWINE DISEASES; VACCINATION; VIRAL VACCINES;

ANIMALIA; BOS TAURUS; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS;

EID: 0038015365     PISSN: 00029645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.805     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Graves JH. Foot-and-mouth disease: a constant threat to US. livestock. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1979;174:174-176.
2. Kitching RP. A recent history of foot-and-mouth disease. J Comp Pathol 1998;118:89-108.
3. Power AP, Harris SA. A cost-benefit evaluation of alternative control policies for foot-and-mouth disease in Great Britain. J Agric Econ 1973;124:573-597.
4. Dijkhuizen AA. Epidemiological and economic evaluation of foot and mouth disease control strategies, using a Markov chain spreadsheet model. Acta Vet Scand 1988;suppl 84:350-352
5. Stougaard E. Combating foot and mouth disease in Denmark: economic consequences of various controt methods. Rev Sci Tech 1984;4:201-217.
6. Berentsen PBM, Dijkhuizen AA, Oskam AJ. A dynamic model for cost-benefit analyses of foot-and-mouth disease control strategy. Prev Vet Med 1992;12:229-243.
7. Doel TR, Williams L, Barnett PV. Emergency vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease - rate of development of immunity and its implications for the carrier state. Vaccine 1994;12:592-600.
8. Salt JS, Barnett PV, Dani P, et al. Emergency vaccination of pigs against foot-and-mouth disease: protection against disease and reduction in contact transmission. Vaccine 1998;16:746-754.
9. Cox SJ, Barnett PV, Dani P, et al. Emergency vaccination of sheep against foot-and-mouth disease: protection against disease and reduction in contact transmission. Vaccine 1999;17:1858-1868.
10. Bergmann IE, Malirat V, Neitzert E, et al. Improvement of a serodiagnostic strategy for foot-and-mouth disease virus surveillance in cattle under systematic vaccination: a combined system of an indirect ELISA-3ABC with an enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot assay. Arch Virol 2000;145:473-489.
11. USDA - Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service. Foot-and-mouth disease emergency disease guidelines. Hyattsville, Md: USDA - Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 1991.
12. Bates TW, Thurmond MC, Carpenter TE. Description of an epidemic simulation model for use in evaluating strategies to control an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease. Am J Vet Res 2003;64:195-204.
13. Bates TW, Thurmond MC, Carpenter TE. Results of epidemic simulation modeling to evaluate strategies to control an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease. Am J Vet Res 2003;64:205-210.
14. Ekboir J. Potential impact of foot-and-mouth disease in California: the role and contribution of animal health surveillance and monitoring services. Davis, Calif: Agricultural Issues Center, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resource, University of California, 1999.
15. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. Census of agriculture. Available at: http://govinfo.kerr.orst.edu/ag-stateis.html. Accessed Sep 4, 2001.
16. Robinson L. USDA: depopulate El Paso dairies. Texas agric. Available at:http://www.txfb.org/TrexasAgricultural/2000/080400/elpa-sodairies.htm. Accessed Jan 14, 2002.
17. National Cattlemen's Beef Association. Economic index. Available at: http://www.beef.org/library/economic/retail/2001%20archives/ NCBAATS1201.XLS. Accessed Jan 14, 2002.
18. Meyer S. How much is a lamb worth? American Sheep Industry Association. Available at: http://www.sheepusa.org/news/cfapps/ articleView.asp?articleID=2075&articleTypeID=7. Accessed Jan 14, 2002.
19. Foot and mouth disease vaccination - some questions and answers. National Office of Animal Health (UK). Available at: http://www.noah.co.uk/issues/briefingdoc/fmd.htm#Q3. Accessed Jan 14, 2002.
20. Locality rates of pay for Sacramento - Yolo, CA. US Office of Personnel Management. Available at: http://www.opm.gov/oca/01tables/GSannual/html/sacramen.htm. Accessed Dec 30, 2001.
21. Federal government 2001 per diem rates - effective October 1, 2000. FED Week. Available at: http://www.fedweek.com/Downloads/PerDiem10_01_00.xls. Accessed Jan 14, 2002.
22. Kitching RP. The application of biotechnology to the control of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Br Vet J 1992;148:375-388.
23. Gibson CF, Donaldson AI, Ferris NP. Response of sheep vaccinated with large doses of vaccine to challenge by airborne foot and mouth disease virus. Vaccine 1984;2:157-161.
24. Garland AJM. Vital elements for the successful control of foot-and-mouth disease by vaccination. Vaccine 1999;17:1760-1766.
25. Yeruham I, Yadin H, Haymovich M, et al. Adverse reactions to FMD vaccine. Vet Dermatol 2001;12:197-201.
26. Beck E, Strohmaier K. Subtyping of European foot-and-mouth disease virus strains by nucleotide sequence determination. J Virol 1987;61:1621-1629.
27. Pluimers FH, Akkerman AM, van der Wal P, et al. Lessons from the foot and mouth disease outbreak in The Netherlands in 2001. Rev Sci Tech 2002;21:711-721.
28. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Statistics on foot and mouth disease. Available at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/footand-mouth/cases/statistics/generalstats.asp. Accessed Nov 12, 2001.
29. Bates TW, Thurmond MC, Carpenter TE. Direct and indirect contact rates among beef, dairy, goat, sheep, and swine herds in three California counties, with reference to control of potential foot-and-mouth disease transmission. Am J Vet Res 2001;62:1121-1129.
30. Anderson I. Foot and mouth disease: lessons to be learned. Inquiry Report HC888. London: Great Britain Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. House of Commons papers 2001-02 888. July 22, 2002.
31. California Tourism. 2000 research and statistics - highlights. Available at: http://gocalif.ca.gov/state/tourism/tour_htmldisplay.jsp? iOID=26417&sFilePath=/tourism/detail/TBCatisticsHighlights.html. Accessed Feb 3, 2002.
32. California Horse Racing Board. California Horse Racing Board statistical report of operation. Sacramento, Calif: State of California,2000