Effects of metal-counterion interactions on the percolation in microemulsions composed of bis(N-octylethylenediamine)metal(II) complexes in water/benzene and water/chloroform systems

Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects

Volumn 221, Issue 1-3, 2003, Pages 119-129

  Er, Hua ^a   Asaoka, Norie ^a   Hisamatsu, Naoko ^a   Iida, Masayasu ^a   Imae, Toyoko ^b  

^a NARA WOMEN'S UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Metal complex surfactant; Microemulsion; Percolation; Reverse micelle; Self diffusion

Indexed keywords

BENZENE; DIFFUSION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; SOLUTIONS; SOLVENTS;

SELF-DIFFUSION;

MICROEMULSIONS;

BENZENE; BIS(N OCTYLETHYLENEDIAMINE)PALLADIUM; CADMIUM DERIVATIVE; CHLOROFORM; DIANIONOBIS(N OCTYLETHYLENEDIAMINE)ZINC; DICHLOROBIS(N OCTYLETHYLENEDIAMINE)CADMIUM; METAL COMPLEX; PALLADIUM COMPLEX; SURFACTANT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER; ZINC COMPLEX;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BOND; DIFFUSION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; MICROEMULSION; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0038013810     PISSN: 09277757     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0927-7757(03)00129-8     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. (a) J.H. Fendler, Membrane Mimetic Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 1983.
2. (b) M.P. Pileni, Structure and Reactivity in Reverse Micelles, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990.
3. (c) J.-H. Fuhrhop, J. Köning, Membranes and Molecular Assemblies: The Synkinetic Approach, The Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 1994.
4. X. Lu, Z. Zhang, Y. Liang, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. (1994) 2731; Langmuir 12 (1996) 5501; Langmuir 13 (1997) 533.
5. X. Lu, Z. Zhang, Y. Liang, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. (1994) 2731; Langmuir 12 (1996) 5501; Langmuir 13 (1997) 533.
6. X. Lu, Z. Zhang, Y. Liang, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. (1994) 2731; Langmuir 12 (1996) 5501; Langmuir 13 (1997) 533.
7. Jaeger D.A., Reddy V.B., Arulsamy N., Bohle D.S., Grainger D.W., Berggren B. Langmuir. 13:1997;533.
8. M. Iida, A. Yonezawa, J. Tanaka, Chem. Lett. (1997) 663.
9. M. Iida, T. Tanase, N. Asaoka, A. Nakanishi, Chem. Lett. (1998) 1275.
10. M. Iida, H. Er, H., N. Hisamatsu, T. Tanase, Chem. Lett. (2000) 518.
11. Ikeda Y., Imae T., Hao J.-C., Iida M., Kitano T., Hisamatsu N. Langmuir. 16:2000;7618.
12. Manna A., Imae T., Iida M., Hisamatsu N. Langmuir. 17:2001;6000.
13. M. Iida, S. Ohkawa, H. Er, N. Asaoka, H. Yoshikawa, Chem. Lett. (2002) 1050.
14. The differences in the diffusion coefficients between the methyl protons and the methylene protons in the zinc(II) complexes were checked for many systems and were within 5%. There was no significant trend concerning the differences. The diffusion coefficients in the methanol and chloroform solutions are not shown here. Some of the results were described in [4,6].
15. Imae T., Takahashi Y., Muramatsu H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114:1992;3414.
16. Shinoda K., Lindman B. Langmuir. 3:1987;135.
17. 0=5 than that of the dichloro-zinc(II) complex would be due to the twice larger concentrations of the former complex in benzene.
18. Stilbs P. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 19:1987;1.
19. (a) T. Wolff, C.-S. Emming, G. von Bünau, K. Zierold, Colloid Polym. Sci. 270 (1992) 822.
20. (b) R. Bott, T. Wolff, K. Zierold, Langmuir 18 (2002) 2004.
21. Weissberger A. Organic Solvents. fourth ed:1986;Wiley, New York.
22. Kondo K., Sano M., Hiwara A., Omi T., Fujita M., Kuwae A., Iida M., Yokoyama H. J. Phys. Chem. B. 104:2000;5040.
23. Iida M., Asayama K., Ohkawa S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 75:2002;521.
24. (a) T.F. Tadros, in: K.L. Mittal, B. Lindman (Eds.), Surfactants in Solution, vol. 3, Plenum, New York and London, 1984, pp. 1501.
25. (19b) M. Clausse, J. Peyrelasse, C. Boned, J. Heil, L. Nicolas-Morgantini, A. Zradba, in: K.L. Mittal, B. Lindman (Eds.), Surfactants in Solution, vol. 3, Plenum, New York and London, 1984, pp. 1583.
26. Maitra A., Mathew C., Varshney M. J. Phys. Chem. 94:1990;5290.
27. (a) B. Antalek, A.T. Williams, J. Texter, Y. Feldman, N. Garti, Colloid Surf. A 128 (1997) 1.
28. (b) Y. Feldman, N. Kozlovich, I. Nir, N. Garti, V. Archipov, Z. Idiyatullin, Y. Zuev, V. Fedotov, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 3745.
29. Manabe M., Ito T., Kawamura H., Kinugasa T., Sasaki Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 68:1995;775.
30. Alexandridis P., Holzwarth J.F., Hatton T.A. J. Phys. Chem. 99:1995;8222.
31. Tanaka R., Shiromizu T. Langmuir. 17:2001;7995.
32. 2 concentration condition is twice larger than the other dichloro complex systems, the difference in the conductivities between the nitrato and chloro systems is too large for the difference in the concentrations.
33. (a) B. Lindman, B. Brun, J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 42 (1973) 388.
34. (b) M. Iida, A. Sakamoto, T. Yamashita, K. Shundoh, S. Ohkawa, K. Yamanari, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 73 (2000) 2033.
35. When the Stokes radius is estimated from modified Eq. (1) by using the viscosity and the diffusion coefficient in concentrated solutions, the apparent estimated radius tends to decrease in highly aggregation systems with an increase of the solute concentrations on the contrary to the actual increase in the aggregate size [17,18].