Pricing criterions in presence of intra- and inter-zonal constraints

Electric Power Systems Research

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 179-186

  Dicorato, M ^a   L'Abbate, A ^a   Minoia, A ^a   Trovato, M ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Double side auction; Nodal prices; Transmission constraints; Zonal pricing

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT THEORY; ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; MARKETING; TOPOLOGY;

ZONAL PRICING;

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS;

EID: 0038009106     PISSN: 03787796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7796(03)00044-0     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Stoft S. Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity. 2002;IEEE Press, Wiley, New York.
2. Philipson L., Lee Willis H. Understanding Electric Utilities and De-Regulation. 1999;Marcel Dekker, New York.
3. J. Bernard, R. Ethier, T. Mount, W. Schulze, R.D. Zimmermann, D. Gan, C. Murillo-Sanchez, R.J. Thomas, R. Schuler, Markets for Electric Power: Experimental Result for Alternative Auction Institutions, Proc. of IEEE Hawaii International Conference On System Sciences, Jan. 1997, Kona, Hawaii.
4. R. Kamat, S. Oren, Two-Settlement systems for electricity markets: zonal aggregation under network uncertainty and market power, PWP-091, Feb. 2002. Available on line at http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/ucei/PDF/pwp091.pdf.
5. S. Harvey, W. Hogan, Nodal and Zonal Congestion Management and the Exercise of Market Power: Further Comment, Feb. 11, 2000, Available on line at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/̃.whogan.cbg.ksg/.
6. Lai L.L. Power System Restructuring and Deregulation. Trading, Performance and Information Technology. 2001;Wiley, New York.
7. M. Dicorato, A. Minoia, R. Sbrizzai, M. Trovato, A simulation tool for studying the day-ahead energy market: the case of Italy, Proc. of IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, Jan 27-31, 2002, New York, Vol. 1, pp 89-94.
8. Schweppe F.C., Caramanis M.C., Tabors R.D., Bohn R.E. Spot Pricing of Electricity. 1988;Kluwer Academic, Boston.
9. Ilic M., Galiana F., Fink L. Power System Restructuring: Engineering and economics. 1998;Kluwer Academic, Boston.
10. Christe R., Wollenberg B.F., Wangesteen I. Transmission management in the deregulated environment. Proc. IEEE. 88:(2):2000;170-195.
11. W. Hogan, Transmission Congestion: The Nodal-Zonal Debate Revisited, Feb. 1999 Available on line at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/̃.whogan.cbg.ksg/nezn0227.pdf.
12. Stoft S. Congestion pricing with fewer prices than zones. Electricity J. 11:(4):1998;23-31.
13. Gan D., Bourcier D.V. Locational market power screening and congestion management: experience and suggestions. IEEE Trans. Power Systems. 17:2002;180-185.
14. Bråten J. Transmission pricing in Norway. Utilities Policy. 6:1997;219-226.
15. Anderson K.P., McCarthy A. Transmission pricing and expansion methodology: lesson from Argentina. Utilities Policy. 8:1999;199-211.
16. Alomoush M.I., Shaidehpour S.M. Contingency-constrained congestion management with a minimum number of adjustments in preferred schedules. Elect. Power Energy Syst. 22:2000;277-290.
17. Raikar S., Ilic M. Assessment of Transmission Congestion for Major Electricty Markets in US. Proc. Power Eng. Soc. SM. 2:2001;1152-1156.