On the dissipation mechanism of Godunov-type schemes

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 188, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 524-542

  Park, Soo Hyung ^a   Kwon, Jang Hyuk ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Contact discontinuity; Godunov type schemes; HLLE+ scheme; Shock instability; Vacuum preserving property

Indexed keywords

CONTACT DISCONTINUITIES; DISSIPATION MECHANISM; GODUNOV-TYPE SCHEMES; HLLE+ SCHEME; NUMERICAL SIGNALS; PROPERTY; RAREFACTION WAVES; SHOCK INSTABILITIES; SIGNAL SPEED; VACUUM PRESERVING PROPERTY;

EID: 0038008324     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00191-8     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. P.L. Roe, Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 43 (1981) 357.
2. S. Osher, F. Solomon, Upwind difference schemes for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws, Math. Comput. 38 (1982) 339.
3. S.K. Godunov, A difference scheme for numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of equations of fluid dynamics, Math. Sbornik. 47 (1959) 271.
4. A. Harten, P.D. Lax, B. van Leer, On upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM Rev. 25 (1983) 35.
5. B. Einfeldt, On Godunov-type methods for gas dynamics, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 25 (1988) 294.
6. B. Einfeldt, C.D. Munz, P.L. Roe, B. Sjögreen, On Godunov-type methods near low densities, J. Comput. Phys. 92 (1991) 273.
7. S. Obayashi, Y. Wada, Practical formulation of a positively conservation scheme, AIAA J. 32 (1993) 1093.
8. M.-S. Liou, Probing numerical fluxes: mass flux, positivity, and entropy-satisfying property, AIAA paper 97-2035-CP (1997).
9. M.-S. Liou, Mass flux schemes and connection to shock instability, J. Comput. Phys. 160 (2000) 623.
10. S.H. Park, J.H. Kwon, Study of Godunov-type schemes using control parameters, in: Proceedings of 4th Asian CFD Conference, Mianyang, China, 2000, p. 574.
11. J.J. Quirk, A contribution to the great Riemann solver debate, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 18 (1994) 555.
12. S.H. Park, J.H. Kwon, An improved HLLE method for hypersonic viscous flows, AIAA paper 2001-2633 (2001).
13. A. Harten, High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys. 49 (1983) 357.
14. H.-C. Lin, Dissipation additions to flux-difference splitting, J. Comput. Phys. 117 (1995) 20.
15. W.K. Anderson, J.L. Thomas, B. van Leer, Comparison of finite volume flux vector splittings for the Euler equations, AIAA J. 24 (1986) 1453.
16. R. Donat, A. Marquina, Capturing shock reflections: an improved flux formula, J. Comput. Phys. 125 (1996) 42.
17. B. van Leer, Flux-vector splitting for the Euler equations, in: Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 170, Springer, Berlin, 1982, p. 507.
18. K.M. Peery, S.T. Imlay, Blunt-body flow simulations, in: AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE 24th Joint Propulsion Conference (AIAA paper 88-2904), 1988.
19. D. Gaitonde, J.S. Shang, Accuracy of flux-split algorithms in high-speed viscous flows, AIAA J. 31 (1993) 1215.
20. T.H. Pulliam, D.S. Chaussee, A diagonal form of an implicit approximate factorization algorithm, J. Comput. Phys. 39 (1981) 347.
21. T.J. Coakley, Implicit upwind methods for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, AIAA J. 23 (1984) 374.
22. J. Fay, F. Riddell, Theory of stagnation point heat transfer rate in dissociated air, J. Aeronaut. Sci. 25 (1953) 73.