Estimation of sensitivity level of personal interview survey questions

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 239-247

  Gupta, Sat ^a   Gupta, Bhisham ^a   Singh, Sarjinder ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Empirical study; Estimation of the mean and the variance; Method of moment estimation; Randomized response sampling; Relative efficiency; Sensitivity of personal interview questions

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038004874     PISSN: 03783758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3758(01)00137-9     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bratley, P., Fox, B.L., Schrage, L.E., 1983. A Guide to Simulation. Springer-Verlag, New York.
2. Cochran, W.G., 1977. Sampling Techniques. Wiley, New York.
3. Chaudhuri, A., Mukerjee, R., 1988. Randomized response: Theory and techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York.
4. Eichhorn, B.H., Hayre, L.S., 1983. Scrambled randomized response methods for obtaining sensitive quantitative data. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 7, 307-316.
5. Franklin, L.A., 1989a. Randomized response rampling from dichotomous populations with continuous randomization. Surv. Methodol. 15, 225-235.
6. Franklin, L.A., 1989b. A comparison of estimators for randomized response sampling with continuous distributions from a dichotomous population. Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 18, 489-505.
7. Greenberg, B.G., Abul-Ela, A.L.A., Simmons, W.R., Horvitz, D.G., 1969. The unrelated question randomized response model - theoretical framework. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 64, 520-539.
8. Kerkvliet, J., 1994. Estimating a logit model with randomized data: the case of cocaine use. Austral. J. Statist. 36, 9-20.
9. Mangat, N.S., Singh, R., 1990. An alternative randomized response procedure. Biometrika 77, 439-442.
10. Mangat, N.S., Singh, R., 1991. An alternative approach to randomized response survey. Statistica 51 (3), 327-332.
11. Mangat, N.S., Singh, R., 1995. A note on the inverse binomial randomized response procedure. J. Ind. Soc. Agril. Statist. 47 (1), 21-25.
12. Mangat, N.S., Singh, R., Singh, S., 1995a. Unrelated question randomized response model without randomization device. Estadistica 47, 59-68.
13. Mangat, N.S., Singh, S., Singh, R., 1995b. On use of a modified randomization device in Warner's model. J. Ind. Soc. Stat. Opers. Res. 16, 65-69.
14. Mangat, N.S., Singh, R., Singh, S., Bellhouse, D.R., Kashani, H.B., 1995c. On efficiency of estimator using distinct respondents in randomised response survey. Surv. Methodol. 21-23.
15. Mangat, N.S., Singh, R., Singh, S., 1997. Violation of respondent's privacy in Moor's model - Its rectification through a random group strategy. Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 26, 743-754.
16. Rao, J.N.K., Sitter, R.R., 1995. Variance estimation under two phase sampling with application to imputation for missing data. Biometrika 82, 453-460.
17. Singh, S., Joarder, A.H., King, M.L., 1996. Regression analysis using scrambled responses. Austral. J. Statist. 38 (2), 201-211.
18. Singh, S., Horn, S., Chowdhuri, S., 1998. Estimation of stigmatized characteristics of a hidden gang in finite population. Austral. NZ J. Statist. 40 (3), 291-297.
19. Tracy, D.S., Mangat, N.S., 1996. Some developments in randomized response sampling during the last decade - A follow up of review by Chaudhuri and Mukherjee. J. Applied Statist. Sci. 4 (2/3), 147-158.
20. Tracy, D.S., Mangat, N.S., 1998. Comparisons of distinct units based estimators in unrelated question randomized response model. Internat. J. Math. Statist. Sci. 7, 229-240.
21. Tracy, D.S., Osahan, S.S., 1995. A partial randomized response strategy. TEST 4 (2), 315-321.
22. Warner, S.L., 1965. Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 60, 63-69.