Determination of ruthenium-phosphorus bond dissociation energies by ES-FTICR mass spectrometry

Organometallics

Volumn 21, Issue 26, 2002, Pages 5688-5691

  Westmore, John B ^a   Rosenberg, Lisa ^a,c   Hooper, Timothy S ^a   Willett, Gary D ^b   Fisher, Keith J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION ENERGY; CHEMICAL BONDS; COMPLEXATION; DISSOCIATION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PHOSPHORUS;

BOND DISSOCIATION ENERGIES;

RUTHENIUM;

EID: 0038002043     PISSN: 02767333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/om020308u     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. (a) Marks, T. J., Ed. Bonding Energetics in Organometallic Compounds; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1990; Vol. 428.
2. (b) Nolan, S. P. In Encyclopedia of Inorganic Chemistry; King, R. B., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1994; p 307.
3. (a) Marshall, A. G.; Hendrikson, C. L.; Jackson, G. S. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1998, 17, 1.
4. (b) Amster, I. J. J. Mass Spectrom. 1996, 31, 1325.
5. Freiser, B. S. In Bonding Energetics in Organometallic Compounds; Marks, T. J., Ed.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1990; Vol. 428, p 55.
6. McLuckey, S. A.; Van Berkel, G. J.; Glish, G. L. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 689A.
7. See for example: (a) Henderson, W.; Nicholson, B. K.; McCaffrey, L. J. Polyhedron 1998, 17, 4291.
8. (b) Hasselgren, C.; Fisher, K.; Jagner, S.; Dance, I. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 3671.
9. (c) Satterfield, M.; Brodbelt, J. S. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 5393.
10. (d) Sautter, A.; Schmid, D. G.; Jung, G.; Würthner, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5424.
11. See the Supporting Information for details of characterization and properties of 1.
12. 3).
13. -, respectively, but so far neither of these bis(diphenylphosphine) intermediates has been observed by NMR spectroscopy.
14. Friesen, D. M.; Rosenberg, L. Unpublished results.
15. Techniques do exist for manipulating air- and moisture-sensitive compounds in ES experiments and also for activating neutral species for electrospray. (See ref 5a and references therein.)
16. (a) Henderson, W.; Fawcett, J.; Kemmitt, R. D. W.; Russell, D. R. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1995, 3007.
17. (b) Hori, H.; Ishitani, O.; Koike, K.; Takeuchi, K.; Ibusuki, T. Anal. Sci. 1996, 12, 587.
18. (c) Hori, H.; Johnson, F. P. A.; Koike, K.; Takeuchi, K.; Ibusuki, T.; Ishitani, O. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1997, 1019.
19. Cone voltage refers to the potential difference between the electrospray nozzle and the skimmer, through which ions pass for mass detection. This value is also referred to as the nozzle-to-skimmer potential difference (PD).
20. The dimeric structure is supported by the isotopic pattern observed.
21. (a) Burnier, R. C.; Cody, R. B.; Freiser, B. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 7436.
22. (b) Cody, R. B.; Burnier, R. C.; Freiser, B. S. Anal. Chem. 1982, 54, 96.
23. (c) Ions generated by electrospray are de-energized in a hexapole ion trap prior to injection into the ICR cell.
24. Hop, C. E. C. A.; McMahon, T. B.; Willett, G. D. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion. Processes 1990, 101, 191.
25. Shukla, A. K.; Futrell, J. H. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1993, 12, 211.
26. ion are the masses (in atomic mass units) of the target molecule and reactant ion, respectively, z is the number of charges on the reactant ion, S (=0.814) is the geometry factor for the 6 cm × 6 cm cylindrical ICR cell, and d is the diameter of the cell (0.060 m).
27. A correlated sweep centered on m/z 775 was used to ensure that only intact 1 entered the ICR cell. See the Supporting Information for details.
28. target are the average radii (in m) of the ion and target molecule, P (in atm) is the pressure of the target gas, T (K) is the temperature of the cell/target gas, and the other symbols are as defined above.
29. 2 pressure in the collision cell (vide infra).
30. See the Supporting Information for details of the choice of CID delay times.
31. More detailed analysis (vide infra) indicates that this estimate is too low but confirms that single-collision conditions do predominate for a CID delay of 0.05 s.
32. Kim, M. S. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 1983, 50, 189.
33. rf = 50 μs by 50/x, where x is the excitation time for the measurement.
34. 2 pressure in the ICE cell ≈6 times higher than that recorded by the manifold ion gauge, See ref 22 and the Supporting Information for details of the calculation of collisional probabilities for these Poisson distributions. (26) (a) Graul, S. T.; Squires, R. R. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1987, 81, 183.
35. (b) Graul, S. T.; Squires, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 892.
36. (c) Kinter, M. T.; Bursey, M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 1797.
37. (d) Marinelli, P. J.; Squires, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4101.
38. Chantry, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 55, 2746.
39. See the Supporting Information for details of the linear regression analysis.
40. Gamasa, M. P.; Gimeno, J.; Gonzalez-Bernardo, C.; Martin-Vaca, B. M.; Monti, D.; Bassetti, M. Organometallics 1996, 15, 302.
41. -1.
42. Quin, L. D. A Guide to Organophosphorus Chemistry; Wiley: New York, 2000.
43. Estimated electronic parameters for phosphines indicate a decrease in ligand donor ability with variation of substituents in the order Me > Ph. > H: Toiman, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 2953.
44. The similarity of our BDE values to those measured by solution calorimetry for Cp*Ru systems is reassuring on this count. Inaccuracies arising from a range of accessible vibrational/rotational states may be insignificant on the scale of BDE being measured and within the levels of precision possible for the FTICR technique.
45. Armentrout, P. B. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 13, 419.