An approach for adaptable learning systems with respect to psychological aspects

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 558-563

  Rumetshofer, Hildegard ^a   Wöß, Wolfram ^a  

^a JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Cognitive styles; Digital learning environment; Intelligent learning environment; Learning styles; Learning technologies; Metadata for education

Indexed keywords

METADATA; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; STUDENTS;

DIGITAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 0037998968     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/952641.952643     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Ayersman, D., Minden, A. 1995. Individual differences, computers, and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 20 (10), 1-20.
2. Barba, R. 1993. The effects of embedding an instructional map in hypermedia courseware. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25 (4), 405-412.
3. Bostock, S. 1998. Learning Styles. Keele University Home, published on http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/cs/Stephen_Bostock/docs/LearningStyles.htm
4. Brusilovsky, P. 2001. Adaptive Hypermedia, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11 : pp 87-110.
5. IEEE 2002. Learning Object Metadata.
6. CHI (Computer Human Interaction) 2001. Notes From E-learning Special Interest Group (SIG) Discussion, published on http://elearnmag.org/.
7. Conner, M., Wright, E., Devries, L., Curry, K., Zeider, C., Wilmsmeyer, D., and Forman, D. 1996. Learning: The Critical Technology, Wave Technologies International, Inc.
8. Dufresne, A., and Turcotte, S. 2002. Cognitive style and its implications for navigation strategies.
9. Hsiao, Y. 1997. The Effects of Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies in a Hypermedia Environment: A Review of Literature, published on http://www.edb.utexas.edu/mmresearch/Students97/Hsiao/index.html.
10. Jacobsen, Peder 2001. Reusable Learning Objects - What does the future hold?, e-learning Magazine, November 2001.
11. Jonassen, D. H. 1988. Integrating learning strategies into courseware to facilitate deeper processing. In Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware, D. Jonassen, Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 151-181.
12. Kearsley, G. 2002. Explorations in Learning & Instruction: The Theory Into Practice Database, published on http://tip.psychology.org.
13. Kogan, N. 1971. Educational Implications of Cognitive Style. In Psychology and Educational Practice, G. S. Lesser, Ed. Glenview, Ill: Scott Foresman and Co, 242-292.
14. Liu, M., Reed, W. M. 1994. The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 10 (4), 419-434.
15. McGreal, R., and Roberts, T. 2001. A Primer on Metadata for Learning Objects, published on http://www.elearningmag.com/issues /Oct01/learningobjects.asp.
16. Orr, K. L., Davidson, G. V. 1992. The effects of group computer-based instruction and learning style on achievement and attitude. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1, 781-792.
17. Preece, J., Davies, G. 1992. Multimedia: Some Promises, Some Problems and Some Issues in Human-Systems Interaction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1, 259-366.
18. Souto, M. A. M., Verdin, R., Beschoren K., Zanella, R., Nicolao, M., Madeira, M., Viccari, R. M., Palazzo de Oliveira, J. 2002. Web Adaptive Training System based on Cognitive Student Style, In Proceedings of the 17th IFIP World Computer Congress, Kluwer, Montréal, Canada.
19. Thornburg, D., Pea, R. 1991. Synthesizing instructional technologies and educational culture: Exploring cognition and metacognition in the social studies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7 (2), 121-164.
20. Witkin, H., Moore, C., Goodenough, D., Cox, P. 1977. Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research 47 (1), 1-64.