Correlation between E-test, disk diffusion, and microdilution methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of fluconazole and voriconazole

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 1647-1651

  Matar, Madonna J ^a,b   Ostrosky Zeichner, Luis ^a   Paetznick, Victor L ^a   Rodriguez, Jose R ^a   Chen, Enuo ^a   Rex, John H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b LEBANESE UNIVERSITY   (Lebanon)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUCONAZOLE; VORICONAZOLE;

AGAR GEL DIFFUSION; ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; CANDIDA; CLINICAL LABORATORY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION; DILUTION; DISK DIFFUSION; DRUG SENSITIVITY; E TEST; FUNGUS ISOLATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MICRODILUTION METHOD; MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION; NCCLS M27 A2 METHOD; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY;

ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS; CANDIDA; DIFFUSION; FLUCONAZOLE; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; PYRIMIDINES; TRIAZOLES;

EID: 0037997086     PISSN: 00664804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.5.1647-1651.2003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arthington-Skaggs, B. A., W. Lee-Yang, M. A. Ciblak, J. P. Frade, M. E. Brandt, R. A. Hajjeh, L. H. Harrison, A. N. Sofair, and D. W. Warnock. 2002. Comparison of visual and spectrophotometric methods of broth microdilution MIC end point determination and evaluation of a sterol quantitation method for in vitro susceptibility testing of fluconazole and itraconazole against trailing and nontrailing Candida isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2477-2481.
2. Arthington-Skaggs, B. A., D. W. Warnock, and C. J. Morrison. 2000. Quantitation of Candida albicans ergosterol content improves the correlation between in vitro antifungal susceptibility test results and in vivo outcome after fluconazole treatment in a murine model of invasive candidiasis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2081-2085.
3. Barry, A. L., and S. D. Brown. 1996. Fluconazole disk diffusion procedure for determining susceptibility of Candida species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2154-2157.
4. Barry, A. L., M. A. Pfaller, S. D. Brown, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. A. Ghannoum, C. Knapp, R. P. Rennie, J. H. Rex, and M. G. Rinaldi. 2000. Quality control limits for broth microdilution susceptibility tests of ten antifungal agents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3457-3459.
5. Barry, A. L., M. A. Pfaller, R. P. Rennie, P. C. Fuchs, and S. D. Brown. 2002. Precision and accuracy of fluconazole susceptibility testing by broth microdilution, Etest, and disk diffusion methods. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1781-1784.
6. Colombo, A. L., F. Barchiesi, D. A. McGough, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1995. Comparison of Etest and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method for azole antifungal susceptibility testing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:535-540.
7. Eldere, J. V., L. Joosten, A. Verhaeghe, and I. Surmont. 1996. Fluconazole and amphotericin B antifungal susceptibility testing by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method compared with E-test and semiautomated broth microdilution test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:842-847.
8. Espinel-Ingroff, A. 1994. Etest for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 19:217-220.
9. Espinel-Ingroff, A., M. Pfaller, M. E. Erwin, and R. N. Jones. 1996. Interlaboratory evaluation of Etest method for testing antifungal susceptibilities of pathogenic yeasts to five antifungal agents by using Casitone agar and solidified RPMI 1640 medium with 2% glucose. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:848-852.
10. Kirkpatrick, W. R., T. M. Turner, A. W. Fothergill, D. I. McCarthy, S. W. Redding, M. G. Rinaldi, and T. F. Patterson. 1998. Fluconazole disk diffusion susceptibility testing of Candida species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:3429-3432.
11. Meis, J., M. Petrou, J. Bille, D. Ellis, and D. Gibbs. 2000. A global evaluation of the susceptibility of Candida species to fluconazole by disk diffusion. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 36:215-223.
12. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; Approved standard. NCCLS document M27-A2. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
13. Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, A. Houston, K. Mills, A. Bolmstrom, and R. N. Jones. 2000. Evaluation of the Etest method for determining voriconazole susceptibilities of 312 clinical isolates of Candida species by using three different agar media. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3715-3717.
14. Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, A. Karlsson, and A. Bolmstrom. 1998. Evaluation of the Etest method for determining fluconazole susceptibilities of 402 clinical yeast isolates by using three different agar media. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2586-2589.
15. Rex, J. H., P. W. Nelson, V. L. Paetznick, M. Lozano-Chiu, A. EspinelIngroff, and E. J. Anaissie. 1998. Optimizing the correlation between results of testing in vitro and therapeutic outcome in vivo for fluconazole by testing critical isolates in a murine model of invasive candidiasis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:129-134.
16. Rex, J. H., M. A. Pfaller, T. J. Walsh, V. Chaturvedi, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. A. Ghannoum, L. L. Gosey, F. C. Odds, M. G. Rinaldi, D. J. Sheehan, and D. W. Warnock. 2001. Antifungal susceptibility testing: practical aspects and current challenges. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14:643-658.
17. Vandenbossche, I., M. Vaneechoutte, M. Vandevenne, T. De Baere, and G. Verschraegen. 2002. Susceptibility testing of fluconazole by the NCCLS broth macrodilution method, E-test, and disk diffusion for application in the routine laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:918-921.
18. Wanger, A., K. Mills, P. W. Nelson, and J. H. Rex. 1995. Comparison of Etest and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing: enhanced ability to detect amphotericin B-resistant Candida isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:2520-2522.