Framing of the television violence issue in newspaper coverage

Television Violence and Public Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 313-334

  Hoffner, Cynthia ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037996181     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Cantor, J., and K. Harrison. 1996. “Ratings and Advisories for Television Programming: University of Wisconsin, Madison Study.” In National Television Violence Study: Scientific Papers 1994-1995 (III-i—III-50). Studio City, CA: Mediascope.
2. Dionisopoulos, G. N., and R. E. Crable. 1988. “Definitional Hegemony as a Public Rela-tions Strategy: The Rhetoric of the Nuclear Power Industry after Three Mile Island.” Central States Speech Journal 39:134-45.
3. Donnerstein, E., R. G. Slaby, and L. D. Eron. 1994. “The Mass Media and Youth Aggression.” In Reason to Hope: A Psychosocial Perspective on Violence and Youth, ed. L. D. Eron, J. H. Gentry, and P. Schlegel, 219-50. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4. Duck, J. M., and B. A. Mullin. 1995. “The Perceived Impact of the Mass Media: Recon-sidering the Third Person Effect.” European Journal of Social Psychology 25:77-93.
5. Dunwoody, S. 1986. “When Science Writers Cover the Social Sciences.” In Reporting Science: The Case of Aggression, ed. J. H. Goldstein, 67-81. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Edelman, M. J. 1993. “Contestable Categories and Public Opinion.” Political Communication 10:231-42.
7. Entman, R. M. 1991. “Framing U.S. Coverage of International News: Contrasts in Narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents.” Journal of Communication 41(4): 6-28.
8. Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43(4): 51-58.
9. Entman, R. M., and A. Rojecki. 1993. “Freezing out the Public: Elite and Media Framing of the U.S. Anti-Nuclear Movement.” Political Communication 10:151-67.
10. Eron, L. D. 1986. “The Social Responsibility of the Scientist.” In Reporting Science: The Case of Aggression, ed. J. H. Goldstein, 11-20. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Evans, W. 1995. “The Mundane and the Arcane: Prestige Media Coverage of Social and Natural Science.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 72:168-77.
12. Gamson, W. A. 1989. “News as Framing.” American Behavioral Scientist 33:157-61.
13. Goshorn, K., and O. H. Gandy Jr. 1995. “Race, Risk and Responsibility: Editorial Con-straint in the Framing of Inequality.” Journal of Communication 45(2): 133-51.
14. Gunter, B. 1994. “The Question of Media Violence.” In Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, ed. J. Bryant and D. Zillmann, 163-211. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Gunter, B., and H. Stipp. 1992. “Attitudes about Sex and Violence on Television in the United States and in Great Britain: A Comparison of Research Findings.” Medienpsychologie 4:267-86.
16. Haskins, R. 1985. “From the Social Policy Perspective: Comment and Critique.” In The Media, Social Science, and Social Policy for Children, ed. E. A. Rubinstein and J. D. Brown, 78-89. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
17. Herman, E. S. 1985. “Diversity of News: ‘Marginalizing’ the Opposition.” Journal of Communication 35(3): 135-47.
18. Hoffner, C., R. S. Plotkin, M. Buchanan, J. D. Anderson, S. Schneider, L. A. Ricciotti, L. Kowalczyk, K. Silberg, and A. Pastorek. 1997. The Third-person Effect in Perceptions of the Influence of Television Violence. Paper presented to the meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada, May.
19. Iyengar, S. 1990. “Framing Responsibility for Political Issues: The Case of Poverty.” Political Behavior 12:19-40.
20. Iyengar, S. 1991. Is Anyone Responsihle? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Iyengar, S., and A. Simon. 1993. “News Coverage of the Gulf Crisis and Public Opinion: A Study of Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing” Communication Research 20:365-83.
22. Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. 1984. “Choices, Values, and Frames .” American Psychologist 39:341-50.
23. Kunkel, D., B. J. Wilson, E. Donnerstein, D. Linz, S. L. Smith, T. Gray, E. Blumenthal, and J. Potter. 1995. “Measuring Television Violence: The Importance of Context” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 39:284-91.
24. Kunkel, D., B. J. Wilson, D. Linz, J. Potter, E. Donnerstein, S. L. Smith, E. Blumenthal, and T. Gray. 1996. “Violence in Television Programming Overall: University of California, Santa Barbara Study” In National Television Violence Study: Scientific Papers 1994-1995 (I-1-I-172). Studio City, CA: Mediascope.
25. Mazur, A. 1981. “Media Coverage and Public Opinion on Scientific Controversies.” Journal of Communication 31(2): 106-15.
26. Moore, D. W., and L. Saad. 1993. “Public Says: Too Much Violence on TV.” The Gallup Poll Monthly August: 18-20.
27. Olien, C. N., G. A. Donohue, and P. J. Tichenor. 1995. “Conflict, Consensus, and Public Opinion” In Public Opinion and the Communication of Consent, ed. T. L. Glasser and C. T. Salmon, 301-22. New York: Guilford.
28. Paik, H., and G. Comstock. 1994. “The Effects of Television Violence on Antisocial Behavior: A Meta-analysis ” Communication Research 21:516-46.
29. Pan, Z., and G. M. Kosicki. 1993. “Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse.” Political Communication 10:55-76.
30. Perloff, R. M. 1993. “Third-Person Effect Research 1983-1992: A Review and Synthesis.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 5:167-84.
31. Rubinstein, E. A., and J. D. Brown. 1985. “Television and Children: A Public Policy Dilemma.” In The Media, Social Science, and Social Policy for Children, ed. E. A. Rubinstein and J. D. Brown, 93-117. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
32. Singer, E., and P. Endreny. 1987. “Reporting Hazards: Their Benefits and Costs.” Journal of Communication 37(3): 10-26.
33. Skews, R. K. 1995. “Dailies Still on Losing Trend in Circulation.” Advertising Age 66 (November 6): 34.
34. Wallack, L., L. Dorfman, D. Jernigan, and M. Themba. 1993. Media Advocacy and Public Health. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35. Weiss, C. H., and E. Singer. 1988. Reporting of Social Science in the National Media. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
36. Wright, J. C., M. St. Peters, and A. C. Huston. 1990. “Family Television Use and Its Relation to Children s Cognitive Skills and Social Behavior.” In Television and the American Family, ed. J. Bryant, 227-52. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.