Male ornamentation and its condition-dependence in a paternal mouthbrooding cardinalfish with extraordinary sex roles

Journal of Ethology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 153-159

  Okuda, Noboru ^a   Fukumori, Kayoko ^b   Yanagisawa, Yasunobu ^b  

^a EHIME UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b EHIME UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Apogonidae; Indicator mechanism; Mate choice; Mouthbrooding; Sexual ornament; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

APOGON; APOGON NOTATUS; APOGONIDAE;

EID: 0037995678     PISSN: 02890771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10164-002-0091-6     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Andersson M (1986) Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40:804-816
2. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
3. Arnold SJ, Wade MJ (1984) On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38:709-719
4. Balshine-Earn S, McAndrew BJ (1995) Sex-role reversal in the black-chinned tilapia, Sarotherodon melanotheron (Rüppel) (Cichlidae). Behaviour 132:861-874
5. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G (2001) Male pipefish prefer ornamented females. Anim Behav 61:345-350
6. Clayton DH (1991) The influence of parasites on host sexual selection. Parasitol Today 7:329-334
7. Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA (1992) Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Q Rev Biol 67:437-456
8. Clutton-Brock TH, Vincent ACJ (1991) Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature 351:58-60
9. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215-223
10. Gwynne DT (1991) Sexual competition among females: what causes courtship-role reversal? Trends Ecol Evol 6:118-121
11. Hayashi M (2002) Apogonidae. In: Nakabo (ed) Fishes of Japan with pictorial keys to the species, English edn. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, pp 750-779
12. Heywood JS (1989) Sexual selection by the handicap mechanism. Evolution 43:1387-1397
13. Hoelzer GA (1989) The good parent process of sexual selection. Anim Behav 38:1067-1078
14. Ichikawa N (1989) Breeding strategy of the male brooding water bug, Diplonychus major Esaki (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae): is male back space limiting? J Ethol 7:133-140
15. Iwasa Y, Pomiankowski A, Nee S (1991) The evolution of costly mate preferences II. The "handicap" principle. Evolution 45:1431-1442
16. Jones IL (1990) Plumage variability functions for status signalling in least auklets. Anim Behav 39:967-975
17. Jones IL, Hunter FM (1999) Experimental evidence for mutual inter-and intrasexual selection favouring a crested auklet ornament. Anim Behav 57:521-528
18. Kirkpatrick M (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1-12
19. Kokko H (1998) Should advertising parental care be honest? Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1871-1878
20. Kokko H, Monaghan P (2001) Predicting the direction of sexual selection. Ecol Lett 4:159-165
21. Kuwamura T (1983) Spawning behavior and timing of fertilization in the mouthbrooding cardinalfish Apogon notatus. Jpn J Ichthyol 30:61-71
22. Kuwamura T (1985) Social and reproductive behavior of three mouth-brooding cardinalfishes, Apogon doederleini, A. niger and A. notatus. Environ Biol Fish 13:17-24
23. Kuwamura T (1987) Night spawning and paternal mouthbrooding of the cardinalfish Cheilodipterus quinquelineatus. Jpn J Ichthyol 33:431-434
24. Kvarnemo C, Ahnesjö I (1996) The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends Ecol Evol 11:404-408
25. Lachner EA (1953) Family Apogonidae: Cardinal Fishes. In: Schults LP et al. (eds) Fishes of the Marshall and Marianas Islands. US Natl Mus Bull, Washington, pp 412-498
26. Lande R (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3721-3725
27. Lande R, Arnold SJ (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226
28. Ligon JD (1999) The evolution of avian breeding systems. Oxford University Press, New York
29. Moore AJ (1990) The evolution of sexual dimorphism by sexual selection: the separate effects of intrasexual selection and intrasexual selection. Evolution 44:315-331
30. Okuda N (1999a) Female mating strategy and male brood cannibalism in a sand-dwelling cardinalfish. Anim Behav 58:273-279
31. Okuda N (1999b) Sex roles are not always reversed when the potential reproductive rate is higher in females. Am Nat 153:540-548
32. Okuda N (2000) Interspecific differences in male cannibalistic behavior between two sympatric cardinalfishes (Pisces: Apogonidae). J Ethol 18:5-10
33. Okuda N (2001) The costs of reproduction to males and females of a paternal mouthbrooding cardinalfish Apogon notatus. J Fish Biol 58:776-787
34. Okuda N, Yanagisawa Y (1996a) Filial cannibalism by mouthbrooding males of the cardinal fish, Apogon doederleini, in relation to their physical condition. Environ Biol Fish 45:397-404
35. Okuda N, Yanagisawa Y (1996b) Filial cannibalism in a paternal mouthbrooding fish in relation to mate availability. Anim Behav 52:307-314
36. Okuda N, Tayasu I, Yanagisawa Y (1998) Determinate growth in a paternal mouthbrooding fish whose reproductive success is limited by buccal capacity. Evol Ecol 12:681-699
37. Okuda N, Miyazaki M, Yanagisawa Y (2002) Sexual difference in buccal morphology of the paternal mouthbrooding cardinalfish Apogon doederleini. Zool Sci 19:801-807
38. Omori M, Takahashi K (1980) Ecological studies on the apogonid fish "Tenjikudai" (Apogon lineatus) in Yuya Bay. Bull Seikai Reg Fish Res Lab 54:111-133 (in Japanese)
39. Parker GA, Simmons LW (1996) Parental investment and the control of sexual selection: predicting the direction of sexual competition. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:315-321
40. Pomiankowski A, Iwasa Y, Nee S (1991) The evolution of costly mate preferences I. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution 45:1422-1430
41. Price T (1993) Sexual selection when the female directly benefits. Biol J Linn Soc 48:187-211
42. Reist JD (1985) An empirical evaluation of several univariate methods that adjust for size variation in morphometric data. Can J Zool 63:1429-1439
43. Rosenqvist G (1990) Male mate choice and female-female competition for mates in the pipefish Nerophis ophidion. Anim Behav 39:1110-1115
44. Simmons LW (1992) Quantification of role reversal in relative parental investment in a bush cricket. Nature 358:61-63
45. Simmons LW (1995) Relative parental expenditure, potential reproductive rates, and the control of sexual selection in katydids. Am Nat 145:797-808
46. Thresher RE (1984) Reproduction in reef fishes. TFH, Neptune City, N.J.
47. Vincent A, Ahnesjö I, Berglund A, Rosenqvist G (1992) Pipefishes and seahorses: are they all sex role reversed? Trends Ecol Evol 7:237-241
48. Warner RR, Schultz ET (1992) Sexual selection and male characteristics in the bluehead wrasse, Thalassoma bifasciatum: mating site acquisition, mating site defense, and female choice. Evolution 46:1421-1442
49. Williams GC (1975) Sex and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.