The diffusion of environmental technologies: The case of the Turkish fertiliser industry

International Journal of Technology Management

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 68-87

  Cetindamar, Dilek ^a  

^a SABANCI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Environmental technologies; Institutional infrastructure; Technology diffusion; Technology system; The Turkish fertiliser industry

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION;

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0037987764     PISSN: 02675730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2003.003145     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Rogers, E.M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, New York.
2. Geroski, P.A. (2000) 'Models of technology diffusion', Research Policy, Vol. 29, pp.603-626.
3. Jaffe, A.B., Newell, R.G. and Stavins, R.N. (2000) Technological Change and the Environment, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No: 7970.
4. Hultberg, P.T., Nadiri, M.I. and Sickles, R.C. (1999) 'An international comparison of technology adoption and efficiency: a dynamic panel model', Annales-d'Economie-et-de-Statistique, September - December, No. 55-56, pp.449-74.
5. Caselli, F. and Coleman II, W.J. (2001) 'Cross-country technology diffusion: the case of computers', American Economic Review, May, Vol. 91, No. 2, pp.328-336.
6. Davis, C. (1995) 'The earth summit and the promotion of environmentally sound industrial innovation in developing countries', Knowledge, Technology & Policy, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp.26-53.
7. Blackman, A. and Bannister, G.J. (1998) 'Community pressure and clean technology in the informal sector: an econometric analysis of the adoption of propane by traditional Mexican brickmakers', Journal of Environment Economics and Management, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 1-21.
8. Weber, M. and Hoogma, R. (1998) 'Beyond national and technological styles of innovation diffusion: a dynamic perspective on cases from the energy and transport sectors', Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp.545-66.
9. Porter, M. and Linde, C.V.D. (1995) 'Green and competitive: ending the stalemate', Harvard Business Review, September-October, pp. 120-134.
10. OECD (1994) Applying Economic Instruments to Environmental Policies in OECD and Dynamic Non-member Countries, OECD, Paris.
11. Cropper, M.L. and Dates, W.E. (1992) 'Environmental economics: a survey', Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 30, pp.675-740.
12. Kemp, R. (1993) 'An economic analysis of cleaner technology: theory and evidence,' in K. Fischer and J. Schot (Eds.) Environmental Strategies for Industry: International Perspectives on Research Needs and Policy Implications, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
13. Jaffe, A.B. and Palmer, K. (1996) 'Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study', Working Paper No. 5545, National Bureau of Economic Research.
14. Jenkins, R. (1997) 'Environmental regulation and international competitiveness', Workshop on Environmental Regulation, Globalization of Production and Technological Change, UNU/INTECH, Maastricht, 14-15 March.
15. Geiser, K. (1991) 'The greening of industry', Technology Review, August-September, Vol. 94, No. 6, pp.64-73.
16. Bartzokas, B. and Yarime, M. (1999) 'Environmental regulation and corporate strategies in the European fertilizer industry', Report No. 21, UNU/INTECH.
17. UNCTAD (1994) Sustainable Development: Trade and Environment - The Impact of Environment-related Policies on Export Competitiveness and Market Access, Geneva, UNCTAD, TD/B/41 (1)/4.
18. West, P. and Senez, P. (1992) 'Environmental assessment of the NAFTA: the Mexican environmental regulation position', Report - prepared for the Province of British Columbia, Ministry of Economic Development, Small Business and Trade.
19. World Bank (1992) World Development Report: 1992, Oxford University Press.
20. Bartzokas, B. and Yarime, M. (1997) Technological trends in pollution-intensive industries', Workshop on Environmental Regulation, Globalization of Production and Technological Change, UNU/INTECH, Maastricht, 14-15 March.
21. IFA (International Fertilizer Industry Association) (1996) Mineral Fertilizer Production and the Environment, IFA, Paris.
22. Cetindamar, D. (1998) 'The impact of environmental regulations on the Turkish fertilizer industry', Report No. 16, UNU/INTECH.
23. Carlsson, B. and Stankiewicz, R. (1991) 'On the nature, function and composition of technological systems', Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp.93-118.
24. TUMAS (1987) Türkiye Kimya Sanayi Envanteri (Turkish Chemical Industry Inventory), SPO, Ankara, Vol. 2.
25. SPO (State Planning Organization) (1996) Special Commission Report on Fertilizers, Seventh Five Year Development Plan (1996-2000), SPO, Ankara.
26. AFP (Association of Fertilizer Producers) (1998) Gübre Istatistikleri (Fertilizer Statistics), AFP, Ankara.
27. Paramatik (1996) Gübre Sekẗrünün Önu Açik (The Future of Fertilizer Industry is Open). Paramatik, April, pp.12-13.
28. Paramatik (1997) Gübreye GAP Pompasi (The Boom in Fertilizer Industry due to SAP), Paramatik, May 1997, pp.48-51.
29. Chamber of Environment Engineers (CEE) (1997) Çevre Katoloǧu (Environment Catalog), CEE, Ankara.
30. Çevre Teknolojisi (1997) 'Çevreted'den', Çevre Teknolojisi, August, Vol. 23, p. 1.
31. Üzülmez, M. (1993) Ülkemizde ve Dünya'da Hazirlanmts Temel Çevre Politikalari ve Yasal Düzenlemeler (Main Environment Policies and Regulations in Turkey and World), Istanbul Municipality, Istanbul.
32. SPO (1995) Seventh Five Year Development Plan (1996-2000), SPO, Ankara.
33. SPO (1998) National Environmental Application Plan, SPO, Ankara.
34. OECD (1995) Promoting Cleaner Production in Developing Countries, OECD, Paris.
35. OECD (1997) Globalisation and Environment, OECD, Paris.