Developmental of Croydon's primary care protocols for common mental illnesses 2001: A bottom-up approach

Psychiatric Bulletin

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 221-224

  Bruce, Maggie ^a  

^a Cedar Court ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DEPRESSION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; STANDARD;

EID: 0037983758     PISSN: 09556036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0955603600002300     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Cluzeau, F., Littlejohns, P., Grimshaw, J., et al (1997) Appraisal Instrument for Clinical Guidelines - Version 1. London: St George's Hospital Medical School.
2. Department of Health (1999) National Service Framework for Mental Health: Modern Standards and Service. London: Department of Health.
3. Duke, J. (1993) Patient protocols: Commissioning, design and use. World Hospitals, 29, 15-19.
4. Feder, G. (1998) Guidelines for clinical guidelines. BMJ, 317, 427-428.
5. Field, M. J. & Lohr, K. N. (1992) Guidelines for Clinical Practice. From Development to Use. Wasington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. Hibble, A., Kanka, D., Pencheon, D., et al (1998) Guidelines in general practice - The new Babel? BMJ, 317, 862-863.
7. South London and Maudsley NHS Trust (2001) South London and Maudsley NHS Trust Prescribing Guidelines (6th edn) (ed. D. Taylor). London: South London and Maudsley NHS Trust.
8. Tomson, D. (2001) Guidelines, Protocol and Pitfalls or Why Sisyphus Hadn't Read the Evidence. The Primary Care Education and Development Unit, University of Northumbria.