Improved implicit integrators for transient impact problems - dynamic frictional dissipation within an admissible conserving framework

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 192, Issue 19, 2003, Pages 2223-2248

  Love, G R ^a   Laursen, T A ^a  

^a Duke University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DEFORMATION; IMPACT TESTING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

TRANSIENT IMPACT PROBLEMS;

FRICTION;

MATHEMATICAL METHOD;

EID: 0037981465     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7825(03)00257-3     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Armero, F., & Petocz, E. (1998). A new class of conserving algorithms for dynamic contact problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 158 269-300.
2. Armero, F., & Petocz, E. (1999). A new dissipative time-stepping algorithm for frictional contact problems: formulation and analysis. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 179 151-178.
3. Armero, F., & Romero, I. (2001). On the formulation of high-frequency dissipative time-stepping algorithms for nonlinear dynamics. Part I: low-order methods for two model problems and nonlinear elastodynamics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 190 2603-2649.
4. Armero, F., & Romero, I. (2001). On the formulation to high-frequency dissipative time-stepping algorithms for nonlinear dynamics. Part II: second-order methods. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 190 6783-6824.
5. Chawla, V., & Laursen, T. A. (1998). Energy consistent algorithms for frictional contact problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 40 863-886.
6. Crisfield, M. A., & Shi, J. (1994). A co-rotational element/time-integration strategy for nonlinear dynamics. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 37 1897-1913.
7. Demkowicz, L., & Bajer, A. (2001). Conservative discretization of contact/impact problems for nearly rigid bodies. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 190 1903-1924.
8. Gonzalez, O. (2000). Exact energy and momentum conserving algorithms for general models in nonlinear elasticity. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 190 1763-1783.
9. Jones, R. E., & Papadopoulos, P. (2000). A yield-limited Lagrange multiplier formulation for frictional contact. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 48 1127-1149.
10. Laursen, T. A., & Chawla, V. (1997). Design of energy conserving algorithms for frictionless dynamic contact problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 40 863-886.
11. Laursen, T. A., & Love, G. R. (2002). Improved implicit integrators for transient impact problems--geometric admissibility within the conserving framework. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 53 245-274.
12. Laursen, T. A., & Simo, J. C. (1993). A continuum-based finite element formulation for the implicit solution of multibody, large deformation frictional contact problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 36 3451-3485.
13. G.R. Love, Velocity update algorithms for transient impact problems: consideration of kinematic discontinuities within a conserving framework, Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University, 2000
14. Meng, X. N., & Laursen, T. A. (2002). Energy consistent algorithms for dynamic finite deformation plasticity. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 191 1639-1675.
15. Simo, J. C., & Laursen, T. A. (1992). An augmented lagrangian treatment of contact problems involving friction. Comput. Struct., 42 97-116.
16. Simo, J. C., & Tarnow, N. (1992). The discrete energy-momentum method. Part I. conserving algorithms for nonlinear elastodynamics. Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 43 757-793.