Willingness to pay to improve domestic water supply in rural areas of Central Tanzania: Implications for policy

International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 119-132

  Kaliba, Aloyce R M ^a   Norman, David W ^b   Chang, Yang Ming ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT PINE BLUFF   (United States)

^b KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Central Tanzania; Multinomial Logit; Probit; Water supply; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

DEMAND ANALYSIS; WATER PLANNING; WATER SUPPLY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

TANZANIA;

EID: 0037970339     PISSN: 13504509     EISSN: 17452627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504500309469791     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alberini, A., Kanninern, B and Carson, R.T. (1997). Modeling response incentive effects in dichoto-mous choice contingent valuation data. Land Economics, 73, 309-24
2. Altaf, MA., Jamal, H and Whittington, D. (1992). Willingness to Pay for Water in Rural Punjab, Pakistan. Water and Sanitation Report #4. (Washington DC: UNDP/World Bank Water and Sanitation Programme)
3. Baidu-Forson, J., Ntare, B.R and Waliyar, F. (1997). Utilising conjoint analysis to design modern crop varieties: Empirical example for groundnuts in Niger. Agricultural Economics, 16, 219-26
4. Bank of Tanzania (BoT) (2000). 4th Quarter Report. (Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania: Government Printers)
5. Black, M. (1998). learning What Works: A 20-Year Retrospective View on International Water and Sanitation Cooperation (1978-98). (Washington DC: UNDP/ Wrorld Bank Water and Sanitation for Health Programme)
6. Christe, N and Schwab, G. (1995). The Valuation of Human Costs by the Contingent Method: The Swiss Experience. In Christe, N., Schwab, G and Soguel. N.D. (eds), Contingent Valuation, Transport Safety and the Value of Life. (The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher)
7. Cooper, J.C. (1997). Combiningactual and contingent behavior data to model farmer adoption of water quality' protection practices. Journal of Agriculture ami Resource Economics, 22, 30-43
8. Donaldson, C., Thomas, R.T and Torgerson, DJ. (1997). Validity' of open-ended and payment scale approaches to eliciting willingness to pay. Applied Economics, 29, 79-84
9. Haneman, W.M. (1984). Welfare evaluation in contingent valuation experiment with discrete responses. AmericanJournal of Agricultural Economics, 66, 332-41
10. Johnston, R.J and Swallow, S.K (1999). Asymmetries in ordered strength of preference models: implication for focus shiftfor discrete-choice preference estimation. Iand Economics, 75, 295-310
11. Kaliba, A.R.M. (2002). Participatory Evaluation of Community Based Water and Sanitation Programmes: The Case of Central Tanzania. PhD Dissertation, Manhattan, Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University
12. Kenkel, P.L and Norris, P.E. (1995). Agricultural producers' willingness to pay for real-time meso-scale weather information. Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics, 20, 356-72
13. Lindberg, K., Johnson, R.L. and Berrens, R.P. (1997). Contingentvaluation of rural tourism development with tests of scope and mode stability. Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics, 22, 44-60
14. McFadden, D. (1981). Economic Models of Probabilistic Choice. In Manski, C and McFadden, D. (eds), Structural Analysis of Discrete Data urith Econometric Application. (Cambridge USA: The MIT Press)
15. Ministry of Water (MoW) (1997). Tanzania Water Policy. (Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania: Government Printer)
16. Narayan, D (1995). Participatory Evaluation: Tools for Managing Change in Water and Sanitation. Paper No.207. (Washington, DC: The World Bank)
17. Persson, U., Norinder, A.L and Svensson, M. (1995). Valuing the Benefits of Reducing the Risk of Non-Fatal Road Injuries: The Swedish Experience. In Christe, N., Schwab, G and Soguel, N.C. (eds), Contingent Valuation, Transport Safety and the Value of Life. (The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher)
18. Rollins, K. (1997). Wilderness canoeing in Ontario: Using cumulative results to update dichotomous choice contingent valuation offer amounts. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 45, 1-16
19. Rosenbergcr, R.S and Walsh, R.G. (1997). Nonmarket value of western valley ranchland using contingent valuation. Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics, 22, 296-309
20. Russell, S., Fox-Rushby, J and Arhin, D. (1995). Willingness and ability to pay for health care: A selection of methods and issues. Health Policies and Planning, 10, 94-101
21. Sara, J and Katz, T. (1998). Making Rural Water Supply Sustainable: Reports on the Impact of Project Rules. (Washington, DC: UNDP/World Bank Sanitary' Programme)
22. Steven, H.T., Barrett, C and Willis, C.E. (1997). Conjoint analysis of groundwater protection programmes. Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics, 26, 229-36
23. World Bank/UNDP (2000). Sustainability Monitoring the, VIP Way: A Ground-Level Exerase (Washington, DC: Water and Sanitation Programme-South Asia, UNDP/World Bank)