Local information as a resource in distributed quantum systems

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 90, Issue 10, 2003, Pages

  Horodecki, Michal ^a   Horodecki, Karol ^a   Horodecki, Pawel ^b   Horodecki, Ryszard ^a   Oppenheim, Jonathan ^a,c   SenDe, Aditi ^a   Sen, Ujjwal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GDA SK   (Poland)

^b GDANSK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^c HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISTILLATION; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; ENTROPY; INFORMATION THEORY; PHASE TRANSITIONS; THEOREM PROVING; THERMODYNAMICS;

DISTRIBUTED QUANTUM SYSTEMS; HEAT BATH; NEUMANN ENTROPY; QUANTUM INFORMATION THEORY; STATE TRANSFORMATIONS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0037966006     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. C. H. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. A 59, 1070 (1999).
2. W. H. Zurek, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 9, 5 (2000)
3. H. Ollivier and W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 17901 (2002).
4. J. Oppenheim et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 180402 (2002).
5. W. H. Zurek, quant-ph/0202123.
6. J. Oppenheim et al., quant-ph/0207025
7. 2m.
8. C. H. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996).
9. G. Vidal, J. Mod. Opt. 47, 355 (2000).
10. M. Horodecki et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2014 (2000).
11. E. Rains, quant-ph/0008047
12. E. Rains, Phys. Rev. A, 60, 179 (1999); an operation Λ is PPT if ΓΛΓ is a completely positive map where Λ is the partial transpose.
13. V. Vedral, quant-ph/9903049.
14. Such maps were considered from a formal point of view in K. Zyczkowski, report, 2001 (unpublished).
15. M. Horodecki et al., quant-ph/0212019.
16. B. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. A 51, 2738 (1995).
17. D. Petz and M. Mosonyi, quant-ph/9912103.
18. L.J. Schulman and U. Vazirani, quant-ph/9804060.
19. D. Janzing et al., quant-ph/0002048.
20. C. H. Bennett et al., quant-ph/0106052.
21. S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich, Phys. Rev. A 56, R3319 (1997).
22. Actually in Ref. [3] we used C(losed)LOCC where one could borrow only the information in ancillas. Here, we consider a given state on a larger Hilbert space, which means that ancillas are added at the very beginning.
23. V. Vedral and M. B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. A 57, 1619 (1998).
24. i.
25. C. H. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046 (1996).
26. H.-K. Lo and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1459 (1999).
27. B)].
28. otimes;n).
29. M. Donald et al., J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 43, 4252 (2002).
30. M. Horodecki, Quantum Inf. Comput. 1, 3 (2001).
31. M. Fannes, Commun. Math. Phys. 31, 291 (1973).
32. M. Donald and M. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 264, 257 (2001).
33. The set of IPB states in note convex as assumed in Ref. [30]. However, it is enough that the set starlike, so that any IPB state can be connected with a maximally mixed state by a straight line that is inside the set.