Modeling open-set spoken word recognition in postlingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: Some preliminary results with the neighborhood activation model

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 612-620

  Meyer, Ted A ^a   Frisch, Stefan A ^a   Pisoni, David B ^a   Miyamoto, Richard T ^a   Svirsky, Mario A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implantation; Open set; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLOSED SET CONSONANT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONSONANT; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MULTICHANNEL RECORDER; NEIGHBORHOOD ACTIVATION MODEL; PHONEME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROCESS MODEL; SPEECH REHABILITATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VOWEL; VOWEL CONFUSION MATRIX; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0037960728     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200307000-00014     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Bertschy M, et al. Longitudinal assessment of physiological and psychophysical measures in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1995;16:439-49.
2. Skinner MW, Holden LK, Holden TA, et al. Performance of postlinguistically deaf adults with the Wearable Speech Processor (WSP III) and Mini Speech Processor (MSP) of the Nucleus Multi-Electrode Cochlear Implant. Ear Hear 1991;12:3-22.
3. Skinner MW, Clark GM, Whitford LA, et al. Evaluation of a new spectral peak (SPEAK) coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant system. Am J Otol 1994;15:15-27.
4. Tyler RS, Moore BC, Kuk FK. Performance of some of the better cochlear-implant patients. J Speech Hear Res 1989;32:887-911.
5. Tyler RS, Parkinson AJ, Woodworth GG, Lowder MW, Gantz BJ. Performance over time of adult patients using the Ineraid or Nucleus cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;102:508-22.
6. Blamey PJ, Pyman BC, Gordon M, et al. Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:342-8.
7. Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG, Knutson JF, Abbas PJ, Tyler RS. Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;102:909-16.
8. Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F, et al. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 1996;1:293-306.
9. Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ. Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. Am J Otol 1999;20:445-52.
10. Bilger RC, Wang MD. Consonant confusions in patients with sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1976;19:718-48.
11. Wang MD, Bilger RC. Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features. J Acoust Soc Am 1973;54:1248-66.
12. Boothroyd A, Nittrouer S. Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;84:101-14.
13. Nittrouer S, Boothroyd A. Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;87:2705-15.
14. Rabinowitz WM, Eddington DK, Delhorne LA, Cuneo PA. Relations among different measures of speech reception in subjects using a cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;92:1869-81.
15. McClelland JL, Elman JL. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognit Psychol 1986;18:1-86.
16. Luce PA. Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon. Technical Report No. 6. Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University, 1986.
17. Luce PA, Pisoni DB. Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear Hear 1998;19:1-36.
18. Kucera F, Francis W. Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press, 1967.
19. Charles-Luce J, Luce PA, Cluff MS. Retroactive influence of syllable neighborhoods. In Altmann GTM, ed. Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990:173-84.
20. Cluff MS, Luce PA. Similarity neighborhoods of spoken two-syllable words: retroactive effects on multiple activation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1990;3:551-63.
21. Meyer TA, Pisoni DB. Some computational analyses of the PBK test: effects of word frequency and lexical density on spoken word recognition. Ear Hear 1999;20:363-71.
22. Luce PA, Goldinger SD, Auer ET, Vitevitch MS. Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN. Percept Psychophys 2000;62:615-25.
23. Vitevitch MS, Luce PA, Pisoni DB, Auer ET. Phonotactics, neighborhood activation, and lexical access for spoken words. Brain Lang 1999;68:306-11.
24. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 1991;352:236-8.
25. Tyler RS, Preece JP, Lowder MW. The Iowa audiovisual speech perception laser video disc. In Laser Videodisc and Laboratory Report. Iowa City: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, 1987.
26. Nusbaum HC, Pisoni DB, Davis CK. Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words. Progress Report No. 10. Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University, 1984.
27. Peterson G, Lehiste I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Dis 1962;27:62-70.
28. Frisch SA, Pisoni DB. Modeling spoken word recognition performance by pediatric cochlear implant users using feature identification. Ear Hear 2000;21:578-89.
29. Miller GA, Nicely PE. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am 1955;27:301-15.
30. Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Osberger MJ. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1995;16:470-81.
31. Stevens KN. Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998.
32. Loizou PC, Poroy O, Dorman M. The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;108:790-802.
33. Lane H, Bahan B. Ethics of cochlear implantation in young children: a review and reply from a DEAF-WORLD perspective. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;119:297-313.
34. Svirsky MA, Robbins AM, Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychol Sci 2000;11:153-8.