Effect of the silicone disclosing procedure on the shear bond strength of composite cements to ceramic restorations

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 60-65

  Szep, Susanne ^a   Schmid, Claudia ^a   Weigl, Paul ^a   Hahn, Lothar ^a   Heidemann, Detlef ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; GLASS; GLYCEROL; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; SILANE; SILICONE; TOOTH CEMENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; IN VIVO STUDY; SIMULATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; THERMODYNAMICS;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GLYCEROL; HUMANS; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; MATERIALS TESTING; RESIN CEMENTS; SILANES; SILICONES; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0037946819     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2003.1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. McLean JW. The science and art of dental ceramics. 1st ed. Chicago: Quintessence, 1980.
2. Rykke M. Dental materials for posterior restorations. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992;8:139-48.
3. Anusavice KJ. Degradability of dental ceramics. Adv Dent Res 1992;6:82-9.
4. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M, Heinzmann JL. Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:425-30.
5. Groten M, Probster L. The influence of different cementation modes on the fracture resistance of feldspathic ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:169-77.
6. Sjogren G, Hedlund S. Filler content and gap width after luting of ceramic inlays, using the ultrasonic insertion technique and composite resin cements: an in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:403-7.
7. Peutzfeldt A. Effect of the ultrasonic insertion technique on the seating of composite inlays. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:51-4.
8. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of different etching periods on the bond strength of a composite resin to a machinable porcelain. J Dent 1998;26:53-8.
9. Ferrando JM, Graser GN, Tallents RH, Jarvis RH. Tensile strength and microleakage of porcelain repair materials. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:44-50.
10. Rouet JF, Soderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res 1995;74:381-7.
11. Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched pocelain. J Dent Res 1987;66:1460-5.
12. Hofmann N, Haller B. Shear strength of composite luted to ceramic. A comparison of three ceramic materials. In: Mörmann WH (Herausg.). 1st international symposium on computer restorations. Berlin: Quintessenz; 1991. p. 151-62.
13. Lacy AM, LaLuz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:288-91.
14. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ, Torres TJ, Avera SP. Shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:17-23.
15. McInnes-Ledoux PM, Ledoux WR, Weinberg R. A bond strength study of luted castable ceramic restorations. J Dent Res 1989;68:823-5.
16. Chadwick RG, Mason AG, Sharp W. Attempted evaluation of three porcelain repair systems - what are we really testing? J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:610-5.
17. Sjogren G. Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting: an in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:24-8.
18. Sorensen JA. Improved seating of ceramic inlays with a silicone fit-checking medium. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:646-9.
19. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Fatigue behaviour of different dentin adhesives. Clin Oral Invest 1999;3:11-7.
20. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Comparison of the marginal integrity of in vivo and in vitro Class II composite restorations. J Dent 1993;21:158-62.
21. Draughn RA. Compressive fatigue limits of composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1979;58:1093-6.
22. White SN, Sorensen JA, Kang SK. Improved marginal seating of cast restorations using a silicone disclosing medium. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:323-6.
23. Arakelian A Jr. A technique for seating castings. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:357.
24. Rissin L, Wetreich G. Utilization of elastomeric materials to evaluate the accuracy of cast restorations prior to cementation. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:585-6.
25. Davis SH, Kelly JR, Campbell SD. Use of an elastomeric material to improve the occlusal seat and marginal seal of cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:288-91.
26. Millstein PL, Ho JC, Naim W, Nathanson D. Effect of a silicone fit-indicator on crown retention in vitro. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:510-1.
27. Sheth J, Jensen M, Tolliver D. Effect of surface treatment on etched porcelain bond strength to enamel. Dent Mater 1988;4:328-37.
28. Zhukovsky L, Settembrini L, Epelboym D. Tooth-colored inlays: new cementation technique. Gen Dent 1997;45:290-293.
29. Christgau M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Resch U. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to dentin in vitro. Oper Dent 1999;24:137-46.
30. Mackert JD Jr. Physical properties. In: O'Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 1997. p. 13-23.