The hate crime statistics act of 1990: Developing a method for measuring the occurrence of hate violence

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2002, Pages

  Nolan, James J ^a   Akiyama, Yoshio ^b   Berhanu, Samuel ^b  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037938752     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764202046001009     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Akiyama, Y. & Nolan, J. (1999). Methods for analyzing and interpreting NIBRS data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15(2), 225-228.
2. Black, D. (1980). The manners and customs of the police. New York: Academic Press.
3. Boyd, E., Berk, R., & Hamner, K. (1996). Motivated by hatred or prejudice: Categorization of hatemotivated crimes in two police divisions. Law and Society Review, 30(4), 819-850.
4. Cogan, J. (2002). Hate crime as a crime category worthy of policy attention. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(1), 173-185.
5. Crime Identification Technology Act of 1998, Title I, § 101, 112 Stat. 1871, Public Law 105-251 (1998).
6. del Frate, A. A., & Goryainov, K. (1994). Latent crime in Russia. Rome, Italy: United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute.
7. Faggiani, D., & McLaughlin, C. (1999). Using National Incident-Based Reporting System data for strategic crime analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15(2), 181-191.
8. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1988). National Incident-Based Reporting, Volume 1, Data Collection Guidelines. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
9. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1988). National Incident-Based Reporting, Volume 2. Data Submission Specifics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
10. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1988). National Incident-Based Reporting, Volume 3. Approaches to Implementing an Incident-Based Reporting System Edition. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
11. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1988). National Incident-Based Reporting, Volume 4. Error Message Manual. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
12. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1998). Crime in the United States, 1997. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
13. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2000). Crime in the United States, 1999. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
14. Finkelhor, D., & Ormond, R. (2000). Kidnaping of juveniles: Patterns from NIBRS. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
15. Gove, W. R., Hughes, M., & Geerken, M. (1985). Are Uniform Crime Reports a valid indicator of the index crimes? An affirmative answer with minor qualifications. Criminology, 23(3), 451-501.
16. Green, D. P., Strolovitch, D., & Wong, J. (1998). Defended neighborhoods, integration, and racially motivated crime. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 372-403.
17. Greenberg, M. S., & Ruback, R. B. (1985). A model of crime victim decision making. Victimology, 10(1-4), 600-616.
18. Jenness, V., & Grattet, R. (2001). Making hate a crime: From social movement to law enforcement. New York: Russell Sage.
19. Levin, J., & McDevitt, J. (1993). Hate crimes: The rising tide of bigotry and bloodshed. New York: Plenum.
20. Martin, S. E. (1995). A cross-burning is not just an arson: Police social construction of hate crimes in Baltimore County. Criminology, 33(3), 303-326.
21. McDevitt, J., Balboni, J., & Bennett, S. (2000). Improving the quality and accuracy of bias crime statistics nationally. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
22. McDevitt, J., Balboni, J., Nolan, J., & Weiss, J. (2001). Bridging the information disconnect in bias crime reporting (A research proposal submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice, Northeastern University).
23. New York City Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project. (1995). Report on anti-gay/lesbian violence in the United States. New York: Author.
24. Nolan, J., & Akiyama, A. (1999). An analysis of factors that affect law enforcement participation in hate crime reporting. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 15(1), 111-127.
25. Nolan, J., Akiyama, Y., & Berhanu, S. (2000, November). A county-level analysis of hate crimes in three states: An empirical test of the tobit model. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, CA.
26. Nolan, J., Conti, N., & Hatcher, J. (2001, April). Hate crime in the media: An analysis of news articles before and after passage of the Hate Crime Statistics Act. Paper presented at the annual conference of the North Central Sociological Association, Louisville, KY.
27. O'Brien, R. (1985). Crime and victimization data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28. Regoli, R., & Hewitt, J. (2000). Delinquency in society. Boston: McGraw Hill.
29. Schmalleger, F. (1999). Criminal justice today. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30. Schwind, H., & Zwenger, G. (1992). The dark number analysis of motives for non-reporting theft in three studies. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 1(1), 115-126.
31. Shah, R., & Pease, K. (1992). Crime, race and reporting to the police. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 31(3), 192-199.
32. Siegel, L., & Senna, J. (2000). Juvenile delinquency: Theory, practice, and law (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson.
33. Skogan, W. (1976). Crime and crime rates. In W. Skogan (Ed.), Sample surveys of victims of crime. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
34. Snyder, H. N. (1999). The overrepresentation of juvenile crime proportions in robbery clearance statistics. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15(1), 151-161.
35. Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: A national report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
36. Stolzenberg, L., & D'Alessio, S. (2000). Gun availability and violent crime: New evidence from the National Incident-Based Reporting System. Social Forces, 78(4), 1461-1482
37. Thompson, M., Saltzman, L., & Bibel, D. (1999). Applying NIBRS data to the study of intimate partner violence: Massachusetts as a case study. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15(2), 163-180.
38. United States Congress (101st Congress). (1990). Hate Crime Statistics Act (Public Law 101-275). Washington, DC.
39. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1993). Hate Crime Statistics 1992. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
40. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1994). Hate Crime Statistics 1993. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
41. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1995). Hate Crime Statistics 1994. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
42. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1996). Hate Crime Statistics 1995. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
43. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1997a). Hate Crime Statistics 1996. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
44. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1997b). Training guide for hate crime data collection. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
45. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1997c). Hate crime data collection guidelines. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
46. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1998). Hate Crime Statistics 1997. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
47. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1999). Hate Crime Statistics 1998. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
48. Warner, B. D., & Pierce, G. L. (1993). Reexamining social disorganization theory using calls to the police as a measure of crime. Criminology, 31(4), 493-517.
49. Wexler, C., & Marx, G. T. (1986). When law and order works: Boston's innovative approach to the problem of racial violence. Crime & Delinquency, 32(2), 205-223.
50. White, B., & Mosher, D. (1986). Experimental validation of a model for predicting the reporting of rape. Sexual Coercion & Assault, 1(2), 43-56.