How different? Comparing housing policies and housing affordability consequences for low income households in Australia and the Netherlands

Nederlandse Geografische Studies

Volumn , Issue 318, 2003, Pages 19-246

  Milligan, Vivienne Rae ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFORDABLE HOUSING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HOUSING POLICY; LOW INCOME HOUSING;

AUSTRALIA; NETHERLANDS;

EID: 0037933111     PISSN: 01694839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (472)

1. ABS (AUSTRALIAN BUREAU OF STATISTICS) (Various), Year book Australia. Cat. no. 1301.0. Canberra: ABS.
2. ABS (Various), House price indexes. Eight capital cities. Cat. no. 6416.0. Canberra: ABS.
3. ABS (Various), Building activity Australia. Cat. no. 8752.0. Canberra: ABS.
4. ABS (1987), The household expenditure survey 1984: Household characteristics. Cat. no. 6531.0. Canberra: ABS.
5. ABS (1990), The household expenditure survey 1988/89: Household characteristics. Cat. no. 6531.0. Canberra: ABS.
6. ABS (1995), Australian housing survey 1994: Selected findings. Cat. no. 4181.0. Canberra: ABS.
7. ABS (1996), Australian housing survey 1994: Housing characteristics, conditions and costs. Cat. no. 4182.0. Canberra: ABS.
8. ABS (1996), Australian social trends 1995. Cat. no. 4102.0. Canberra: ABS.
9. ABS (1996), The household expenditure survey 1993/94: Household characteristics. Cat. no. 6531.0. Canberra: ABS.
10. ABS (1997), Census of population and housing. Basic community profile 1996. Cat. no. 2020.0. Canberra: ABS.
11. ABS (1998), Sydney. A social atlas. Cat. no. 2030.1. Canberra: ABS.
12. ABS (2000), Household expenditure survey 1998/99: Summary of results. Cat. no. 6530.0. Canberra: ABS.
13. ABS (2000), Australian social trends 2000. Cat. no. 4102.0. Canberra: ABS.
14. ABS (2000), Australian housing survey 1999: Housing costs, characteristics and conditions. Cat. no. 4182.0. Canberra: ABS.
15. ABS (2000), Consumer price index. Cat. no. 6401.0. Canberra: ABS.
16. ABS (2001) (AHS) Australian housing survey 1999: Confidentialised unit record files. Canberra: ABS.
17. ABS (2001), Household expenditure survey 1998/99: Detailed expenditure tables. Cat. no. 6535.0. Canberra: ABS.
18. ABS (2001), Australian housing survey 1999. Technical paper: Confidentialised unit record file. Cat. no. 4186.0.30.001. Canberra: ABS.
19. ABS (2001), The household expenditure survey 1998/99: Household characteristics. Cat. no. 6531.0. Canberra: ABS.
20. ABS (2002), Estimated resident population. Cat. no. 3101.0. Canberra: ABS.
21. aedes (1999), Dutch social housing in a nutshell. Hilversum: aedes.
22. AHURI (AUSTRALIAN HOUSING AND URBAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE) (1997), Australia's private rental market: Processes and policies. Working Paper no. 9. Melbourne: AHURI.
23. AHURI (2001), Fact sheet 3: Housing assistance funding trends. Australian Housing Policy Project. Melbourne: AHURI.
24. AIHW (AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF HEALTH AND WELFARE) (1993), Australia's welfare 1993. Canberra: AIHW.
25. AIHW (1995), Australia's welfare 1995. Canberra: AIHW.
26. AIHW (1997), Australia's welfare 1997. Canberra: AIHW.
27. AIHW (1999), Australia's welfare 1999. Canberra: AIHW.
28. AIHW (2001), Australia's welfare 2001. Canberra: AIHW.
29. ALBON, R., ed. (1980), Rent control. Costs and consequences. St Leonards: Centre for Independent Studies.
30. ALEXANDER, I. (2000), The post-war city. In: S. Hamnett & R. Freestone, ch. 6.
31. ALLPORT, C. (1987), Castles of security: The New South Wales Housing Commission and home ownership, 1941-61. In: M. Kelly, ed., Sydney: City of suburbs, ch. 5. Sydney: NSW University Press.
32. AMBROSE, P.J. (1991), The housing provision chain as a comparative analytical framework. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 8, pp. 91-104.
33. AMBROSE, P.J. (1992), The performance of national housing systems: A three nation comparison. Housing Studies 7(3), pp. 163-176.
34. ANGEL, S. (2000), Housing policy matters. A global analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. APGAR, W.C. Jr. (1990), Which housing policy is best? Housing Policy Debate 1(1), pp. 1-32.
36. ARTHURSON, K. (2001), Achieving social justice in estate regeneration: The impact of physical image construction. Housing Studies 16(6), pp. 807-826.
37. AUSTRALIAN HOUSING INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL (1993), Structure of the housing industry. Occasional Series No. 5, Housing and Urban Development Program. Canberra: AGPS.
38. AUSTRALIAN URBAN AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (1994), New homes for old. Strategy Paper 1, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
39. BADCOCK, B. (1994), The strategic implications for the Randstad of the Dutch property system. Urban Studies 31(3), pp. 425-444.
40. BADCOCK, B. (1995a), The family home and transfer of wealth in Australia. In: R. Forrest & A. Murie, ch. 3.
41. BADCOCK, B. (1995b), Towards more equitable cities: A receding prospect? In: P. Troy, ch. 9.
42. BADCOCK, B. (1997), Recently observed polarising tendencies and Australian cities. Australian Geographical Studies 35(3), pp. 243-259.
43. BADCOCK, B. (2000a), The imprint of the post-Fordist transition on Australian cities. In: P. Marcuse & R. van Kempen, ch. 10.
44. BADCOCK, B. (2000b), Home ownership. The illusion of egalitarianism. In: P. Troy, ed., A history of European housing in Australia, ch. 15. Oakleigh, Victoria: Cambridge University Press.
45. BADCOCK, B. AND BEER, A. (2000), Home truths. Property ownership and housing wealth in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
46. BALCHIN, P., ed. (1996), Housing policy in Europe. London: Routledge.
47. BALL, M. (1986), Housing analysis: Time for a theoretical refocus. Housing Studies 1(3), pp. 147-165.
48. BALL, M. (1988), Housing provision and comparative housing research. In: Ball et al., ch. 4.
49. BALL, M. (1999), Annual review of European housing markets 1999. Coventry: RICS Books.
50. BALL, M. & M. HARLOE (1992), Rhetorical barriers to understanding housing provision: What the 'Provision thesis' is and is not. Housing Studies 7(1), pp. 3-15.
51. BALL, M. & M. HARLOE, (1998), Uncertainty in European housing markets. In: M. Kleinman, et al., ch. 4.
52. BALL, M., M. HARLOE & M. MARTENS, eds. (1988), Housing and social change in Europe and the USA. London: Routledge.
53. BARLOW, J. & S. DUNCAN (1988), The use and abuse of housing tenure. Housing Studies 3(4), pp. 219-231.
54. BARLOW, J. & S. DUNCAN (1992), Markets, states and housing provision: Four European growth regions compared. Progress in Planning 38(2), pp. 93-177.
55. BARLOW, J. & S. DUNCAN (1994), Success and failure in housing provision. European systems compared. Oxford: Pergamon.
56. BASSETT, K. & J. SHORT (1980), Housing and residential structure: Alternative approaches. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
57. BECKER, U. (1999), The 'Dutch miracle': Employment growth in a retrenched but still generous welfare state. SPRC Discussion Paper no. 99. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.
58. BEER, A. (1993), A dream won: A crisis born. In: C. Paris, ch. 8.
59. BERRY, M. (1983), Posing the housing question in Australia: Elements of a theoretical framework for a Marxist analysis of housing. In: L. Sandercock & M. Berry, ch. 6.
60. BERRY, M. (1986), Housing provision and class relations under capitalism: Some implications of recent Marxist class analysis. Housing Studies 1(2), pp. 109-121.
61. BERRY, M. (1988), To buy or rent? The demise of a dual tenure housing policy in Australia 1945-60. In: R. Howe, ch. 5.
62. BERRY, M. (1999), Unravelling the 'Australian housing solution': The post war years. Housing Theory and Society 16(3), pp. 106-123.
63. BERRY, M. (2000), Investment in rental housing in Australia: Small landlords and institutional investors. Housing Studies 15(5), pp. 661-681.
64. BERRY, M. (2001), Responding to social exclusion through more affordable housing. Sydney: NSW Department of Urban Affairs and Planning.
65. BERRY, M. (2002), Background paper: Affordable housing project. Melbourne: Brotherhood of St Laurence.
66. BERRY, M., T. DALTON, B. ENGELS & K. WHITING (1999), Falling out of home ownership: Mortgage arreas and defaults in Australia. Melbourne: AHURI.
67. BERRY, M. & J. HALL (2001), Policy options for stimulating private sector investment in affordable housing across Australia. Stage 1 report: Outlining the need for action. Reports for the Affordable Housing National Research Consortium. Melbourne: AHURI.
68. BOELHOUWER, P. (2002a), Capital accumulation via home ownership: The case of the Netherlands. European Journal of Housing Policy 2(2), pp. 167-181.
69. BOELHOUWER, P. (2002b), Trends in Dutch housing policy and the shifting position of the social rental sector. Urban Studies 39(2), pp. 219-235.
70. BOELHOUWER, P. & J. VAN WEESEP (1987), Public housing sales in the Netherlands: The record and the outlook. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 4, pp. 3-16.
71. BOELHOUWER, P. & J. VAN WEESEP (1988), On shaky grounds: The case for privatization of the public housing sector in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Housing and Environmental Research 3(4), pp. 319-333.
72. BOELHOUWER, P. & H. PRIEMUS (1990), Dutch housing policy realigned. Netherlands Journal of Housing and Environmental Research 5(1), pp. 105-119.
73. BOELHOUWER, P. & H. VAN DER HEIJDEN (1992), Housing systems in Europe: Part 1. A comparative study of housing policy. Housing and Urban Policy Studies no. 1. Delft: Delft University Press.
74. BOELHOUWER, P. & A.J. MENKVELD (1996), Housing expenditure in Western Europe: Macro and micro housing quotas. Delft Housing and Urban Policy Studies no. 11. Delft: Delft University Press.
75. BOELHOUWER, P., H. VAN DER HEIJDEN & H. PRIEMUS (1996), The Netherlands. In: P. Balchin, ch. 6.
76. BOELHOUWER, P., J. CONIJN & P. DE VRIES (1996), Developments of house prices in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 11(4), pp. 381-399.
77. BOELHOUWER, P. & P. DE VRIES (2001), House price development and the fiscal treatment of home ownership. Paper presented at European network of housing researchers 2001 conference, Housing and Urban Development in the New Europe, Pultusk, June.
78. BOURASSA, S.C. (1994), Immigration and housing tenure choice in Australia. Journal of Housing Research 5(1), pp. 117-137.
79. BOURASSA, S.C. (1995), The impacts of borrowing constraints on home-ownership in Australia. Urban Studies 32(7), pp. 1163-1173.
80. BOURASSA, S.C., A.W. GREIG & P.N. TROY (1995), The limit of housing policy: Home ownership in Australia. Housing Studies 10(1), pp. 83-104.
81. BOURASSA, S.C. & P.H. HENDERSHOTT (1992), Over-investment in Australian housing. National Housing Strategy Background Paper no. 9. Canberra: AGPS.
82. BRADBROOK, A (2001), Rented housing law: Past, present and future. Paper presented at fourth Australian conference of tenancy tribunals and associated bodies, Adelaide, September.
83. BRADBURY, B., C. ROSSITER & J. VIPOND (1986), Poverty, before and after paying for housing. SWRC Reports and Proceedings no. 56. Sydney: Social Welfare Research Centre, University of NSW.
84. BRAMLEY, G. (1994), An affordability crisis in British housing: Dimensions, causes and policy impacts. Housing Studies 9(1), pp. 103-124.
85. BRAMLEY, G. (1997), Direct state involvement in housing land development: The Australian experience in comparative perspective. Working Paper no. 10. Melbourne: AHURI.
86. BROUWER, J. (1988), Rent policy in the Netherlands 1975-1985. Netherlands Journal of Housing and Environmental Research 3(4), pp. 295-307.
87. BURKE, P. (1998), The poverty of homelessness. In: R. Fincher & J. Nieuwenhuysen, ch. 15.
88. BURKE, T. (1998), Housing and poverty. In: R. Fincher & J. Nieuwenhuysen, ch. 8.
89. BURKE, T. (2001), Out of the policy vacuum: Putting public housing back on the policy agenda. The Eighth F. Oswald Barnett Oration. http://www.sisr.net/housing/obo/papers.htm
90. BURKE, T., P. NEWTON & M. WULFF (1990), Australia. In: W. van Vliet, ch. 24.
91. BURKE, T. & D. HAYWARD (1993), Australian housing at the crossroads. Built Environment 18(3), pp. 199-213.
92. BURKE, T. & D. HAYWARD (2000), Melbourne's housing past, housing futures. Institute for Social Research, Melbourne: Swinburne University.
93. BURKE, T. & L. RALSTON (2003), Analysis of expenditure patterns and levels of household indebtedness of public and private rental households, 1975 to 1999. Melbourne: AHURI forthcoming.
94. BURNS, L. & L. GREBLER (1977), The housing of nations: Analysis and policy in a comparative framework. London: Macmillan.
95. CARTER, R., V. MILLIGAN & J. HALL (1988), The benefits and costs of public rental housing in NSW. Research and Policy Papers no. 2. Sydney: Department of Housing.
96. CARTER, T. (1997), Current practices for procuring affordable housing. The Canadian context. Housing Policy Debate 8(3), pp. 593-631.
97. CASTELLS, M. (1977), The urban question. A Marxist approach. London: Routledge.
98. CASTLES, F. (1989a), Why compare Australia? In: F. Castles, ch 1.
99. CASTLES, F. (1989b), Social protection by other means. In: F. Castles, ch. 2.
100. CASTLES, F., ed. (1989c), The comparative history of public policy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
101. CASTLES, F. (1994), The wage earners' welfare state revisited: Refurbishing the established model of Australian social protection, 1983-93. Australian Journal of Social Issues 29(2), pp. 120-145.
102. CASTLES, F. (1996), Needs-based strategies of social protection in Australia and New Zealand. In: G. Esping-Andersen, ch 4.
103. CASTLES, F. (1997a), Leaving the Australian labour force: An extended encounter with the state. Governance 10(2), pp. 97-121.
104. CASTLES, F. (1997b), The institutional design of the Australian welfare state. International Social Security Review 50(2), pp. 25-41.
105. CASTLES, F. (1998), The really big trade-off: Home ownership and the welfare state in the new world and the old. Acta Politica 33(Spring), pp. 5-19.
106. CASTLES, F. & D. MITCHELL (1993), Worlds of welfare and families of nations. In: F. Castles, ed., Families of Nations. Dartmouth: Aldershot.
107. CBS (CENTRAL BUREAU VOOR DE STATISTIEK) (2000), Jaarboek wonen 2000. Voorburg: Kluwer.
108. CHAMBERLAIN, C. (1999), Counting the homeless: Implications for policy development 1996. ABS Occasional Paper, Cat. no. 2041.0. Canberra: ABS.
109. CHAPLIN, R. & A. FREEMAN (1999), Towards an accurate description of affordability. Urban Studies 36(11), pp. 1949-1957.
110. CHOUINARD, V. (1989), Class formation, conflict and housing policies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 13, pp. 390-416.
111. CLAPHAM, D. (1995), Housing and the economy: Broadening comparative housing research. Urban Studies 4/5, pp. 631-647.
112. CLARK, W.A.V. & F.M. DIELEMAN (1996), Households and housing: Choice and outcomes in the housing market. Centre for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick: Rutgers.
113. COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (1995), Community and nation. Statement by the prime minister of Australia, the Honorable P.J. Keating MP. Canberra: AGPS.
114. CONIJN, J. (1994), The dynamic cost principle in the social rented sector in the Netherlands. In: W. Bartlett & G. Bramley, eds., European housing finance: Single market or mosaic, ch. 14. Bristol: SAUS.
115. DALTON, T. (1999), Making housing policy in Australia: Home ownership and the disengagement of the state. PhD thesis, RMIT University, Melbourne.
116. DALY, M. (1982), Sydney boom Sydney bust. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.
117. DAVIS, J.E. (1994), The affordable city. Towards a third sector housing policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
118. DE FEIJTER, H. (1995), Homelessness in the Netherlands 1995. Trends and developments. Unpublished report.
119. DE FEIJTER, H. (1998), Between housing and care in the Netherlands. Are the homeless clients or tenants? Unpublished report.
120. DE KAM, G. (1998), Value for money: Quality and price of land for social housing in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 13(4), pp. 453-475.
121. DE SWANN, A. (1988), In care of the state. Health Care, education and welfare in Europe and the USA in the modern era. New York: Oxford University Press.
122. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING, NSW (2001), Annual report. Sydney: Department of Housing.
123. DIELEMAN, F.M. (1993), Multicultural Holland: Myth or reality? In: R. King, ed., Mass migrations in Europe: The legacy and the future, ch. 7. London: Belhaven Press.
124. DIELEMAN, F.M. (1994), Social rental housing: Valuable asset or unsustainable burden? Urban Studies 31(3), pp. 447-463.
125. DIELEMAN, F.M. (1996), The Quiet revolution in Dutch housing. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 87(3), pp. 275-282.
126. DIELEMAN, F.M. (1999), The impact of housing policy changes on housing associations: Experience in the Netherlands. Housing Studies 14 (2), pp. 251-259.
127. DIELEMAN, F.M. & S. MUSTERD (1992), The Randstad: A research and policy laboratory. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
128. DIELEMAN, F.M. & R. VAN ENGELSDORP GASTELAARS (1992), Housing and physical planning. In: F.M. Dieleman & S. Musterd, ch. 4.
129. DIELEMAN, F.M. & R. VAN KEMPEN (1994), The mismatch of housing costs and income in Dutch housing. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 9(2), pp. 159-172.
130. DIELEMAN, F.M. & C. HAMNETT (1994), Globalisation, regulation and the urban system: Editors' introduction to the special issue. Urban Studies 31(3), pp. 357-364.
131. DIELEMAN, F.M., M. DIJST & T. SPIT (1999), Planning the compact city: The Randstad Holland experience. European Planning Studies 7(5), pp. 605-621.
132. DIELEMAN, F.M. & C. WALLET (2003), Income differences between central cities and suburbs in Dutch urban regions. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, forthcoming.
133. DIPASQUALE, D. & W. WHEATON (1996), Urban economics and real estate markets. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
134. DOLING, J. (1997), Comparative housing policy: Government and housing in advanced industrialised countries. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
135. DOLING, J. (1999), De-commodification and welfare: Evaluating housing systems. Housing Theory and Society 16(4), pp. 156-164.
136. DONNER, C. (2000), Housing policies in the European Union: Theory and practice. Vienna: Christian Donner.
137. DONNISON, D. (1967), The government of housing. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
138. DONNISON, D. & C. UNGERSON (1982), Housing policy. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
139. DSS (DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY) (1997), Overview of the Australian private rental market. In: AHURI, pp. 14-56.
140. DSS (1996), Overview of the Australian private rental market. Research and Policy Paper no. 72. Canberra: DSS.
141. ECUMENICAL HOUSING (1997), National housing policy: Reform and social justice. Melbourne: Ecumenical Housing inc.
142. ELLIS, L. & D. ANDREWS (2001), City sizes, housing costs, and wealth. Sydney: Research Discussion Papers 2001 no. 8. Reserve Bank of Australia. http://www.rba.gov.au/PublicationsAndResearch/Bulletin/2002/index.html
143. ELSINGA, M. (1998), The meaning of tenure under different conditions: Empirical evidence from the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 13(2), pp. 137-152.
144. ESPING-ANDERSEN, G. (1990), The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
145. ESPING-ANDERSEN, G., ed. (1996), Welfare states in transition. National adaptations in global economies. London: Sage Publications.
146. FACS (FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES) (2001), Annual report Housing Assistance Act. Canberra: FACS.
147. FAINSTEIN, S., J. GORDON, M. HARLOE, eds. (1992), Divided cities: New York and London in the contemporary world. Cambridge: Blackwell, Ma.
148. FEDDES, A. (1995), Woningmarkt, regulering en inflatie: Het na-oorlogse volkhuisvestingsbeleid van tien noordwest-europese landen vergeleken. Nederlandse Geografische Studies no. 194. Faculteit Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen, Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.
149. FEDDES, A. & F.M. DIELEMAN (1996), Investment in housing in ten northwest European countries. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 87, pp. 73-79.
150. FEDDES, A. & F.M. DIELEMAN (1997), Development of the rental sector under the financial and economic conditions prevailing in northwestern Europe between 1950 and 1985. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 12(2), pp. 221-235.
151. FEDERAL STATE RELATIONS COMMITTEE (1998), Australian federalism: The role of the states. Second report on the inquiry into overlap and duplication of roles and responsibilities between the Commonwealth and the states. Melbourne: Government Printer.
152. FERMENT, B. (1999), De omvang van het niet-gebruik van huursubsidie. Delft: ABF Onderzoek and Informatie.
153. FIELD, T. (1983), Pensioners who rent - problems and alternatives. Social Security Journal (June), pp. 23-37.
154. FINCHER, R. & J. NIEUWENHUYSEN, eds. (1998), Australian poverty: Then and now. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
155. FLOOD, J. (1997), Urban and housing indicators. Urban Studies 34(10), pp. 1635-1665.
156. FLOOD, J. & J. YATES (1987), Housing subsidies study. Australian Housing Research Council Project no. 160. Canberra: AGPS.
157. FLORIDA, R. & M. FELDMAN (1988), Housing in US Fordism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 12, pp. 187-210.
158. FOARD, G., R. KARMEL, S. COLLET, E. BOSWORTH & D. HULMES (1994), Public housing in Australia. Canberra: AIHW.
159. FORREST, R. & A. MURIE (1995), Housing and family wealth: Comparative international perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.
160. FORSTER, C. (1999), Australian cities. Continuity and change. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
161. FOSTER, R.A. & S.E. STEWART (1991), Australian economic statistics 1949/50 to 1989/90. Occasional Paper No. 8, Sydney: Reserve Bank of Australia. http://www.rba.gov.au/PublicationsAndResearch/ OccasionalPapersAndOtherReports/Index.html
162. FROST, L. & T. DINGLE (1995), Sustaining suburbia: An historical perspective on Australia's urban growth. In: P. Troy, ch. 1.
163. GALSTER, G. (1997), Comparing demand-side and supply-side housing policies: Sub-market and spatial perspectives. Housing Studies 12(4), pp. 561-577.
164. GLEESON, B. (2001), Devolution and state planning systems in Australia. International Planning Studies 6(2), pp. 133-152.
165. GLEESON, B. & LOW, N. (2000), Australian urban planning. New challenges, new agendas. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
166. GOLLAND, A. (1998), Systems of housing supply and housing production in Europe, a comparison of the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Germany. Ashgate: Aldershot.
167. GOODIN, R., B. HEADEY, R. MUFFELS, & H.J. DIRVEN, eds. (1999), The real worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
168. GOODWIN, M. (2001), Regulation as process: Regulation theory and comparative urban and regional research. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 16(1), pp. 71-87.
169. GOUREVITCH, P. (1986), Politics in hard times. Comparative responses to international economic crises. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
170. GRANOVETTER, M. (1985), Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91(3), pp.481-510.
171. GREGORY, R. & B. HUNTER (1996), An exploration of the relationship between changing inequality of individual, household and regional inequality in Australian cities. Urban Policy and Research 14(3), pp. 171-182.
172. GREIG, A. W. (1995), The stuff dreams are made of: Housing provision in Australia 1945-1960. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
173. GREIG, A. W. (1997), Australian housing, technological change and the Fordist regime of accumulation. Housing Studies 12(3), pp. 321-335.
174. GRUIS, V. (2000), How to determine the financial possibilities of Dutch housing associations. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 15, pp. 367-376.
175. GRUMM, J.G. (1976), The analysis of policy impact. In: F. I. Greenstein & N. W. Polsby, eds., Handbook of political science, ch. 6. Reading, Ma: Addison Wesley.
176. GYOURKO, J. & P. LINNEMAN (1993), The affordability of the American dream. Journal of Housing Research 4(1), pp. 39-72.
177. HAFFNER, M.E.A. (1998), Paying for owner occupied housing. In: M. Kleinman, et al., ch. 10.
178. HAFFNER, M.E.A. (1999), Kosten en uitgaven van eigenaar-bewoners. Volkshuisvestingsbeleid en woningmarkt no. 29. Delft: Delft University Press.
179. HAFFNER, M.E.A. (2002), Dutch personal income tax reform 2001: An exceptional position for owner-occupied housing. Housing Studies 17(3), pp. 521-534.
180. HAFFNER, M.E.A. & A.J. MENKVELD (1993), Housing expenses of tenants and owner-occupiers in western Europe. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 8(4), pp. 421-444.
181. HALLETT, G. (1988), Land and housing policies in Europe and the USA. A comparative analysis. London and New York: Routledge.
182. HALLETT, G. (1993), The new housing shortage. Housing affordability in Europe and the USA. London: Routledge.
183. HAMNETT, C. (1994), Social polarisation in global cities: Theory and evidence. Urban Studies 31(3), pp. 401-424.
184. HAMNETT, C. (1996), Social polarisation, economic restructuring and welfare state regimes. Urban Studies 33(8), pp. 1407-1430.
185. HAMNETT, C. & B. RANDOLPH (1988), Cities, housing and profits: Flat break up and the decline of private renting. London: Hutchison.
186. HAMNETT, S. (2000), The late 1990s: Competitive versus sustainable cities. In: S. Hamnett & R. Freestone, ch. 10.
187. HAMNETT, S. & R. FREESTONE, eds. (2000), The Australian metropolis: A planning history. London: E & FN Spon.
188. HANCOCK, K.E. (1993), 'Can pay? Won't pay? Or economic principles of 'affordability'. Urban Studies 30(1), pp. 127-145.
189. HARDING, A. (1997), The suffering middle: Trends in income inequality in Australia 1982 to 1993-94. Discussion Paper no. 21. NATSEM, Canberra: University of Canberra. http://www.natsem.canberra.edu.au/pubs/dps/dp21/dp21.html
190. HARDING, A. & A. SZUKALSKA (2000), Financial disadvantage in Australia, 1999. The unlucky Australians. NATSEM/ the Smith Family, Canberra: University of Canberra.
191. HARLOE, M. (1985), Private rented housing in the United States and Europe. London: Routledge.
192. HARLOE, M. (1988a), The changing role of social rental housing. In: Ball et al., ch. 2.
193. HARLOE, M. (1988b), Towards a new politics of housing provision. In: Ball et al., ch. 6.
194. HARLOE, M. (1991), Towards a theorized comparative housing research. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 8, pp. 129-132.
195. HARLOE, M. (1995), The people's home? Social rental housing in Europe and America. Oxford: Blackwell.
196. HARLOE, M. & M. MARTENS (1984), Comparative housing research. Journal of Social Policy 13(3), pp. 255-277.
197. HARLOE, M., P. MARCUSE & N. SMITH (1992), Housing for people, housing for profits. In: S. Fainstein, et al., ch. 7.
198. HARMER, J. (1986), The funding of rent rebates: Issues and responsibilities. Melbourne: Council of Social Welfare Ministers and Standing Committee of Social Welfare Administrators.
199. HARSMAN, B. & J. QUIGLEY (1991), Housing markets and housing institutions in a comparative context. In: B. Harsman & J. Quigley, eds. (1991), Housing markets and housing institutions: An international comparison, ch. 1. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
200. HARVEY, D. (1978), The urban process under capitalism. A framework for analysis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2(1), pp. 101-131.
201. HARVEY, D. (1982), The limits to capitalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
202. HARVEY, D. (1985), The urbanization of capital. Oxford: Blackwell.
203. HARVEY, D. (1989), The urban experience. Oxford: Blackwell.
204. HAYWARD, D. (1986), The great Australian dream reconsidered: A review of Kemeny. Housing Studies 1(4), pp. 210-219.
205. HAYWARD, D. (1996), The reluctant landlords? A history of public housing in Australia. Urban Policy and Research 14(1), pp. 5-35.
206. HENDERSON, R. (1975), Poverty in Australia. First main report. Australian Government Commission of Inquiry into Poverty. Canberra: AGPS.
207. HILL, M. (1959), Housing finance in Australia 1945-1956. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
208. HILL, M. (1974), Housing finance institutions. In: R. Hirst & R. Wallace, eds., The Australian capital market. ch. 8. Melbourne: Cheshire.
209. HILLS, J. (1998), Housing, tenure and international comparisons of income distribution. In: M. Kleinman, et al., ch. 9.
210. HILMER, F. (1993), National competition policy. Report of the independent committee of inquiry. Canberra. AGPS.
211. HOLLAND, G. (1988), Emoh ruo. Owner building in Sydney. Sydney: Hale and Iremonger.
212. HOOIMEIJER, P. (1999), Het souterrian in cijfers. Rotterdam: Stuurgroep Experimenten Volkshuisvesting.
213. HOUSING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION/COMMONWEALTH BANK (1998), Housing report, a quarterly review of housing affordability. Canberra: HIA/Commonwealth Bank
214. HOWE, R., ed., (1988), New houses for old: Fifty years of public housing in Victoria 1938-1988. Melbourne: Ministry of Housing and Construction.
215. HREOC (HUMAN RIGHTS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION) (1993), Human rights and mental illness. Report of the national inquiry into human rights of people with mental illness. Canberra: AGPS.
216. HUGO, G. (1986), Australia's changing population. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
217. HUGO, G. (2001), A century of population change in Australia. Centenary article: Year book Australia 2001. Cat. no. 1301.0. Canberra: ABS.
218. HULCHANSKI, J.D. (1995), The concept of housing affordability: Six contemporary uses of the housing expenditure to income ratio. Housing Studies 10(4), pp. 471-491.
219. HULSE, K. (2001), Demand subsidies for private renters: A comparative review. Paper presented at the National Housing Conference 'Our Homes, Our Communities, Our Future', Brisbane, October.
220. HULSE, K. (2002), Housing allowances in liberal welfare regimes. PhD thesis, Melbourne: Swinburne University of Technology.
221. IBELINGS, H. (1999), Twentieth century urban design in the Netherlands. Rotterdam: Netherlands Architecture Institute.
222. INDUSTRY COMMISSION (1993), Public housing. Report no. 34. Canberra: AGPS.
223. JESSOP, B. (1990), Regulation theories in retrospect and prospect. Economy and Society 19(2), pp. 153-216.
224. JOBSE, R.B. & S. MUSTERD (1992), Changes in the residential function of the big cities. In: F.M. Dieleman & S. Musterd, ch. 3.
225. JOHNSON, D., I. MANNING & O. HELLWIG (1995), Trends in the distribution of cash income and non cash benefits. Canberra: AGPS.
226. JONES, M.A. (1972), Housing and poverty in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
227. JONES, M.A. (1983), The Australian welfare state. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
228. JUDD, B., ed. (1987), Housing affordability. Housing issues. Report no. 3. Canberra: Royal Australian Institute of Architects.
229. KARMEL, R., ed. (1998), Housing assistance: Report on measurement and data issues. Welfare Division Working Paper no. 17. Canberra: AIHW.
230. KARN, V. & H. WOLMAN (1992), Comparing housing systems: Housing performance and housing policy in the United States and Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
231. KEMENY, J. (1981), The myth of home ownership. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
232. KEMENY, J. (1983), The great Australian nightmare. Melbourne: Georgian House.
233. KEMENY, J. (1987), Towards a theorised housing studies. Housing Studies 2(4), pp. 249-260.
234. KEMENY, J. (1988), Defining housing reality: Ideological hegemony and power in housing research. Housing Studies 3(4), pp. 205-218.
235. KEMENY, J. (1992), Housing and social theory. London and New York: Routledge.
236. KEMENY, J. (1995a), From public housing to the social market: Rental policy strategies in comparative perspective. London: Routledge.
237. KEMENY, J. (1995b), Theories of power in the three worlds of welfare capitalism. Journal of European Social Policy 5(2), pp. 87-96.
238. KEMENY, J. (1995c), Informal allocation of housing wealth in Swedish social renting. In: R. Forrest & A. Murie, ch. 14.
239. KEMENY, J. (2001), Comparative housing and welfare: Theorising the relationship. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 16(1), pp. 53-70.
240. KEMENY, J. & S. LOWE (1998), Schools of comparative housing research: From convergence to divergence. Housing Studies 13(2), pp. 161-176.
241. KENDIG, H. & C. PARIS (1987), Towards fair shares in Australian housing. Canberra: National Committee of Non-government Organisations International Year of Shelter for the Homeless.
242. KENNEDY, R., P. SEE & P. SUTHERLAND (1995), Minimum legislative standards for residential tenancies in Australia. Canberra: Department of Housing and Regional Development.
243. KEWLEY, T.H. (1973), Social security in Australia 1900-1972. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
244. KEYS YOUNG (1998), Homelessness in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander context and its possible implications for the Supported Accommodation Assistance Program (SAAP). Final report. Canberra: Department of Health and Aged Care.
245. KING, A. (1994), Towards indicators of housing stress. Canberra: AGPS.
246. KING, A. (1997), The changing face of Australian poverty. Discussion Paper no. 23. NATSEM, Canberra: University of Canberra. http://www.natsem.canberra.edu.au/pubs/dps/dp23/dp23.html
247. KING, A. (1998), Income poverty since the early 1970s. In: R. Fincher & J. Nieuwenheysen. ch. 4.
248. KIRWAN, R. (1989), Urban consolidation and the future of metropolitan housing. In housing costs and supply: Papers and Proceedings of the Fourth Housing Finance Workshop, pp. 67-96. Canberra: Housing Industry Association.
249. KIRWAN, R. (1991), Financing urban infrastructure: Equity and efficiency conditions. National Housing Strategy Background Paper no. 4. Canberra: AGPS.
250. KLEINMAN, M. (1995), Meeting housing needs through the market: An assessment of housing policies and the supply/ demand balance in France and Great Britain. Housing Studies 10(1), pp. 17-38.
251. KLEINMAN, M. (1996), Housing, welfare and the state in Europe. A comparative analysis of Britain, France and Germany. Cheltenham: Brookfield vt.
252. KLEINMAN, M. (1998), Western European housing policy - convergence or collapse? In: M. Kleinman, et al., ch. 13.
253. KLEINMAN, M. (2002), The future of European Union social policy and its implications for housing. Urban Studies 39(2), pp. 341-352.
254. KLEINMAN, M., W. MATZNETTER & M. STEPHENS, eds. (1998), European integration and housing policy. London and New York: Routledge.
255. KLOOSTERMAN, R. & J. LAMBOOY (1992), The Randstad - A welfare region? In: F.M. Dieleman & S. Musterd, ch. 6.
256. KLUNDER, R. (1988), Private financing in the Dutch public housing sector: The rise and fall of the accumulative loan. Netherlands Journal of Housing and Environmental Research 3(4), pp. 309-318.
257. KNOL, F. (1998), From high to low; From low to high. Changes in the status of neighborhoods. English language summary. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office. http://www.scp.nl/boeken/cahiers/cahl52/uk/metainfo.htm
258. KREUKELS, A. (1992), The restructuring and growth of the Randstad cities: Current policy issues. In: F.M. Dieleman & S. Musterd, ch. 11.
259. KULLBERG, J. (1997), From waiting list to adverts: The allocation of social rental housing dwellings in the Netherlands. Housing Studies 12(3), pp. 393-403.
260. LANDT, J. & R. BRAY (1997), Alternative approaches to measuring rental housing affordability in Australia. Discussion Paper no. 16. NATSEM, Canberra: University of Canberra. http://www.natsem.canberra.edu.au/pubs/dps/dp16/dp16.html
261. LATHAM, M. (1996), Making welfare work. Policy 12, pp. 18-24.
262. LAWSON, J. (1999), Translation and summary of van der Schaar, J. (1998) Honderd jaar volkshuisvestingsbeleid: van gezondheidsvraag to woonmilieubeleid (Amsterdam: RIGO, Research and Advies BV). Unpublished paper.
263. LAWSON, J. (2003), Critical realism and housing research: An explanation of diverging housing solutions. AME, Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, forthcoming.
264. LE GRAND, J. & R. ROBINSON (1984), The economics of social problems. The market versus the state. Second edition. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
265. LENNON, M. (2000), The revival of metropolitan planning. In: S. Hamnett & R. Freestone, ch. 9.
266. LIPIETZ, A. (1998), Rethinking social housing in the hour glass society. In: A. Madanipour, et al., ch. 9.
267. LLOYD, C. & P. TROY (1981), Innovation and reaction: The life and death of the Federal Department of Urban and Regional Development. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
268. LUNDQVIST, L.J. (1991), Rolling stones for the resurrection of policy as the focus of comparative housing research. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 8, pp. 79-90.
269. LUNDQVIST, L.J. (1992), Dislodging the welfare state? Housing and privatisation in four European nations. Housing and Urban Policy Studies no. 3. Delft: Delft University Press.
270. MACLENNAN, D. (1982), Housing economics. London & New York: Longman.
271. MACLENNAN, D. (1998), The future for private rental housing: Surviving niches or flexible markets. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 13(3), pp. 387-407.
272. MACLENNAN, D. & R. WILLIAMS, eds. (1990), Affordable housing in Britain and the United States. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
273. MACLENNAN, D. & G. PRYCE (1996), Global economic change, labour market adjustment and the challenges for European housing policies. Urban Studies 33(10), pp. 1849-1865.
274. MACLENNAN, D. & C. WHITEHEAD (1996), Editorial: Housing economics - an evolving agenda. Housing Studies 11(3), pp. 341-344.
275. MACLENNAN, D. & A. MORE (1997), The future of social housing: Key economic questions. Housing Studies 12(4), pp. 531-547.
276. MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED (1989), Opportunities for initiatives to stimulate the provision of private rental accomodation. National Housing Policy Review, Background Paper no. 3. Canberra: Department of Community Services and Health.
277. MADANIPOUR, A., G. CARS & J. ALLEN, eds. (1998), Social exclusion in European cities processes, experiences and responses. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.
278. MAHER, C. (1994), House prices and geographical scale: Australian cities in the 1980s. Urban Studies 31(1), pp. 5-27.
279. MALPASS, P. (1993), Housing tenure and affordability. The British disease. In: G. Hallett, ch. 3.
280. MALPASS, P. & A. MURIE (1994), Housing policy and practice. Fourth edition. London: Macmillan.
281. MANNING, I. (1998), Policies: past and present. In: R. Fincher & J. Nieuwenhuysen, ch. 1.
282. MANT, J. (1992), Inquiry into the Department of Housing. Sydney: Report of the Commissioner.
283. MARCUSE, P. (1994), Property rights, tenure and ownership: Towards clarity in concept. Housing and Urban Policy Studies no. 3. Delft: Delft University Press.
284. MARCUSE, P. (1996), Is Australia different? Globalization and the new urban poverty. Occasional Paper no. 3. Melbourne: AHURI.
285. MARCUSE, P. & R. VAN KEMPEN, eds. (2000), Globalizing cities. A new spatial order? New York: Blackwell.
286. MARTENS, M. (1988a), Owner-occupied housing: A tenure in transition. In: Ball et al., ch. 3.
287. MARTENS, M. (1988b), The revolution in mortgage finance. In: Ball et al., ch. 4.
288. MCCRONE, G. & M. STEPHENS (1995), Housing policy in Britain and Europe. London: UCL Press.
289. MEUSEN, H. & R. VAN KEMPEN (1995), Towards residual housing? A comparison of Britain and the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 10(3), pp. 239-258.
290. MIK, G. (1991), Housing segregation and policy in the Dutch metropolitan environment. In: E. Huttman, W. Blauw and J. Saltman, eds., Urban housing segregation of minorities in western Europe and the United States, ch. 10. Durham: Duke University Press.
291. MILLIGAN, V. (1983), The state and housing: Questions of social policy and social change. In: A. Graycar, ed., Retreat from the welfare state. Australian social policy in the 1980s, ch. 7. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
292. MILLIGAN, V. & D. PERSSON (1989), Outcomes of the national housing policy review. Urban Policy and Research 7(4), pp. 183-186.
293. MINGIONE, E. (2001), Urban poverty and the under class. Oxford: Blackwell.
294. MISHRA, R. (1990), The welfare state in capitalist society. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
295. MITCHELL, D. (1989), Comparing income transfer systems: Is Australia the poor relation. In F. Castles, ch. 9.
296. MONRO, D. (1998), Two cheers for public housing: The Commonwealth State Housing Agreement 1945 to 1997 - a history. Unpublished report.
297. MTFAH (MINISTERIAL TASK FORCE ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING) (1998), Affordable housing in NSW - the need for action. Sydney: NSW Government.
298. MULLINS, P., J. WESTERN. & B. BROADBENT (2001), The links between housing and nine key socio-cultural factors: A review of the evidence. Positioning Paper. Melbourne: AHURI. http://www.ahuri.edu.au/attachments/pp_housingnon.pdf.
299. MURIE, A. (1997), The social rental sector, housing and the welfare state in the UK. Housing Studies 12(4), pp. 437-461.
300. MURIE, A. (1999), The acquisition and sale of properties by social landlords: Justifications and consequences. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 14(3), pp. 293-307.
301. MURIE, A. & H. PRIEMUS (1994), Social rental housing in Britain and the Netherlands: Trends, trajectories and divergence. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 19(2), pp. 107-126.
302. MURIE, A. & S. MUSTERD (1996), Social segregation, housing and social change in Dutch cities in the 1980s. Urban Studies 33(3), pp. 495-516.
303. MUSTERD, S. & W. OSTENDORF (1998), Segregation and social participation in the welfare state: the case of Amsterdam. In: S. Musterd & W. Ostendorf, eds., Urban segregation and the welfare state: Inequality and exclusion in western cities, ch. 11. London: Routledge.
304. MVROM (MINISTERIE VAN VOLKSHUISVESTING, RUIMTELIJKE ORDENING EN MILIEUBEHEER) (various), Volkshuisvesting in cijfers. The Hague: MVROM.
305. MVROM (2000a), Cijfers over wonen 2000/2001. The Hague: MVROM.
306. MVROM (2000b), Evaluatie huursubsidiewet en RBH/vangnetregeling. The Hague: MVROM.
307. MVROM (2000c), Perspectief op wonen. Rapportage van het woningbehoefte onderzoek 1998. The Hague: MVROM.
308. MVROM (2001), What people want. Where people live. English translation. The Hague: MVROM.
309. MVROM/CBS (1999), WoningBehoefte onderzoek 1998 kernpublicatie. The Hague: MVROM/CBS.
310. NATIONAL COMMUNITY HOUSING FORUM (2002), Characteristics of the community housing sector in Australia. http://www.nchf.org.au
311. NATIONAL HOUSING POLICY REVIEW (1989), Final report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
312. NEEDHAM, B. (1988), The Netherlands. In: G. Hallett, ch. 4.
313. NEEDHAM, B. (1999), Land policy in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 88(3), pp. 291-296.
314. NEEDHAM, B. (2000), Public land-leasing. The Netherlands. Paper presented to a workshop: The international experience in leasing public land. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute.
315. NEEDHAM, B., B. KRUIJT & P. KOENDERS (1993), Urban land and property markets in the Netherlands. London: University College London (UCL) Press.
316. NEEDHAM, B. & R. VERHAGE (1998a), The effects of land policy: Quantity as well as quality is important. Urban Studies 35(1), pp. 25-44.
317. NEEDHAM, B. & R. VERHAGE (1998b), Housing and land in Israel and the Netherlands. Town Planning Review 69(4), pp. 397-422.
318. NELSON, H. (1980), The politics of decontrol in New South Wales. In: R. Albon, ch. 8.
319. NESSLEIN, T.S. (1982), The Swedish housing model: An assessment. Urban Studies 19, pp. 235-246.
320. NESSLEIN, T.S. (1988a), Housing in the welfare state. Have government interventions raised housing investment and lowered housing costs? Urban Affairs Quarterly 24(2), pp. 295-314.
321. NESSLEIN, T.S. (1988b), Housing: The market versus the welfare state model revisited. Urban Studies 25(2), pp. 95-108.
322. NEUTZE, M. (1974), The case for new cities, Urban Studies 11, pp. 259-275.
323. NEUTZE, M. (1981), Urban development in Australia. Revised edition. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
324. NEUTZE, M. (1987), Housing affordability in Australia. In: B. Judd, pp. 1-9.
325. NEUTZE, M. (1995), Financing urban services. In: P. Troy, ch. 10.
326. NHS (NATIONAL HOUSING STRATEGY) (1991), The affordability of Australian housing. National Housing Strategy, Issues Paper no. 2. Canberra: AGPS.
327. NHS (1992), Agenda for action. National Housing Strategy Issues Paper no. 7. Canberra: AGPS.
328. OECD (ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT) (1998), National accounts, Main aggregates. Paris: OECD.
329. ORCHARD, L. (1995), National urban policy in the 1990s. In: P. Troy, ch. 3.
330. ORCHARD, L. (1999), Shifting visions in national urban and regional policy. Australian Planner 36(1), pp. 20-25.
331. OUWEHAND, A. (2002), The Dutch housing policy for the next decade: An attack on housing associations or adjustments to changing demands? European Journal of Housing Policy 2(2), pp. 203-221.
332. OXLEY, M. (1987), The aims and effects of housing allowances in western Europe. In: W. van Vliet, ed., Housing markets and policies under fiscal austerity, ch. 10. Westport: Greenwood Press.
333. OXLEY, M. (1989), Housing policy: Comparing international comparisons. Housing Studies 4, pp. 128-132.
334. OXLEY, M. (1991), The aims and methods of comparative housing research. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 8, pp. 67-77.
335. OXLEY, M. (2001), Meaning, science, context and confusion in comparative housing research. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 16(1), pp. 89-106.
336. OXLEY, M. & J.E. SMITH, (1996), Housing policy and rented housing in Europe. London: E & FN Spon.
337. PAPA, O. (1992), Housing systems in Europe: Part II. A comparative study of housing finance. Housing and Urban Policy Studies no. 2. Delft: Delft University Press.
338. PARIS, C. ed. (1984), Affordable and available housing: The role of the private rental sector. Report no. 117. Canberra: Australian Institute of Urban Studies.
339. PARIS, C. (1993), Housing Australia. Melbourne: Macmillan.
340. PARLEMENT NEDERLAND (1996), Parlement en Kiezer. No. 39. The Hague.
341. PERCIVAL, R. (1998), Changing housing tenure trends and household incomes in Australia, 1975-76 to 1997. Discussion Paper no. 28, NATSEM, Canberra: University of Canberra. http://www.natsem.canberra.edu.au/pubs/dps/dp28/dp28.html
342. PHIBBS, P. (2000), The social and economic impacts of unmet housing needs. Occasional Paper no. 4. Brisbane: Department of Housing. http://www.housing.qld.gov.au/strategic_policy/research/publications.htm
343. PICKVANCE, C.G. (1976), Urban sociology. London: Tavistock.
344. PICKVANCE, C.G. (1986), Comparative urban analysis and assumptions about causality. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 10(2), pp. 162-184.
345. PICKVANCE, C.G. (2001), Four varieties of comparative analysis. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 16(1), pp. 7-28.
346. PIERSON, C. (1998), Beyond the welfare state: The new political economy of welfare. Second Edition. Polity Press, Cambridge.
347. POWER, A. (1993), Hovels to high rise: Social housing in Europe since 1850. London: Routledge.
348. PRAK, N.L. & H. PRIEMUS (1985), Postwar public housing in trouble. Delft: Delft University Press.
349. PRATT, I. (1982), The production, distribution and consumption of housing in Australia: A political economy approach. PhD thesis. Sydney: University of Sydney.
350. PRIEMUS, H. (1984), Housing allowances in the Netherlands: Product of a conservative or progressive ideology? Delft: Delft University Press.
351. PRIEMUS, H. (1990a), The Netherlands. In: W. van Vliet, ch. 4.
352. PRIEMUS, H. (1990b), The (un)controllability of the housing allowance. Netherlands Journal of Housing and Environmental Research 5 (2).
353. PRIEMUS, H. (1992), Housing indicators: An instrument of international housing policy? Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 7(3), pp. 217-238.
354. PRIEMUS, H. (1993), Book review. Housing Studies 8(3), pp. 223.
355. PRIEMUS, H. (1995a), How to abolish social housing? The Dutch case. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 19(1), pp. 145-155.
356. PRIEMUS, H. (1995b), Redefining the welfare state; Impact upon housing and housing policy in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 10(2), pp. 141-155.
357. PRIEMUS, H. (1996a), Recent changes in the social rented sector in the Netherlands. Urban Studies 33(10), pp. 1891-1908.
358. PRIEMUS, H. (1996b), Dutch housing policy in the 1980s and 1990s: Growing uncertainties. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 13, pp. 205-213.
359. PRIEMUS, H. (1997a), Growth and stagnation in social housing: What is social in the social rental sector? Housing Studies 12(4), pp. 549-559.
360. PRIEMUS, H. (1997b), Market oriented housing policy: A contradiction in terms. Recent Dutch experiences. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 21(1), pp. 133-142.
361. PRIEMUS, H. (1998a), Redifferentiation of the urban housing stock in the Netherlands. A strategy to prevent social segregation? Housing Studies 13(3), pp. 301-310.
362. PRIEMUS, H. (1998b), Improving or endangering housing policies? Recent changes in the Dutch housing allowance scheme. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 22(2), pp. 319-330.
363. PRIEMUS, H. (1998c), Contradictions between Dutch housing policy and spatial planning. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 89(1), pp. 31-43.
364. PRIEMUS, H. (1998d), Commercial rented housing: Two sectors in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 13(3), pp. 255-277.
365. PRIEMUS, H. (2000), Rent subsidies in the USA and housing allowances in the Netherlands: Worlds apart. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24(3), pp. 700-712.
366. PRIEMUS, H. (2001a), Poverty and housing in the Netherlands: A plea for a tenure-neutral public policy. Housing Studies 16(3), pp. 277-289.
367. PRIEMUS, H. (2001b), Social housing as a transitional tenure? Reflections on the Netherlands' new housing memorandum 2000-2010. Housing Studies 16(2), pp. 243-256.
368. PRIEMUS, H., P. BOELHOUWER & H. KRUYTHOFF (1997), Dutch urban policy: A promising perspective for the big cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 21(4), pp. 677-690.
369. PRIEMUS, H. & R. VAN KEMPEN (1999), Restructuring urban neighbourhoods in the Netherlands: Four birds with one stone. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 14(4), pp. 403-412.
370. PRIEMUS, H. & F.M. DIELEMAN (2002), Social housing policy in the European Union: Past, present and perspectives. Urban Studies 39(2), pp. 191-200.
371. PRIEMUS, H. & E. LOUW (2002), Recovery of land costs: A land policy instrument missing in the Netherlands. European Journal of Housing Policy 2(2), pp. 127-146.
372. PRIORITIES REVIEW STAFF (1975), Report on housing. Canberra: AGPS.
373. PROSSER, B. & G. LEEPER (1994), Housing affordability and changes to rent assistance. Social Security Journal (June), pp. 40-62.
374. PUGH, C. (1976), Intergovernmental relations and the development of Australian housing policies. Research Monograph no. 15. Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations, Canberra: Australian National University.
375. PUGH, C. (2001), The theory and practice of housing sector development for developing countries, 1950-99. Housing Studies 16(4), pp. 399-423.
376. PUSEY, M. (1991), Economic rationalism in Canberra. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
377. RAINWATER, L. & T. SMEEDING (2003), Comparing living standards across nations: Real incomes at the top, the bottom and the middle. In: D.B. Papadimitriou & E.N. Wolff, eds., What has happened to the quality of life in the advanced industrialized nations? Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, forthcoming.
378. RANDOLPH, B. & D. HOLLOWAY (2002a), Locating change in housing markets: the Sydney case. Unpublished paper.
379. RANDOLPH, B. & D. HOLLOWAY (2002b), The anatomy of housing stress in Sydney. Urban Policy and Research 20(4), pp. 329-355.
380. RASKALL, P. & R. URQUHART (1993), Inequality, living standards and the social wage during the 1980s. Study of social and economic inequalities. Monograph no. 3. Centre for Applied Economic Research and Social Policy Research Centre. Sydney: University of New South Wales.
381. RBA (RESERVE BANK OF AUSTRALIA) (2002), Recent developments in housing: Prices, finance and investor attitudes. Reserve Bank Bulletin. Sydney: RBA. www.rba.gov.au/PublicationsandResearch/Bulletin/2002.Index.html
382. REIA (REAL ESTATE INSTITUTE OF AUSTRALIA) (2001), Australian property market indicators. September, Canberra: REIA. http://www.reiaustralia.com.au/marketreports/APMI-Sept-01.pdf
383. RUDESTAM, K.E. & R.R. NEWTON (1992), Surviving your dissertation: A comprehensive guide to content and process. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
384. RUONAVAARA, H. (1993), Types and forms of housing tenure: Towards solving the comparison translation problem. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 10, pp. 3-20.
385. SALET, W.G.M. (1999), Regine shifts in Dutch housing policy. Housing Studies 14(4), pp. 547-557.
386. SANDERCOCK, L. (1975), Cities for sale. Property, politics and urban planning in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
387. SANDERCOCK, L. (1979), The land racquet. The real costs of property speculation. Canberra: Silverfish.
388. SANDERCOCK, L. & M. BERRY (1983), Urban Political Economy. The Australian case. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
389. SAUNDERS, PETER (1998a), Setting the poverty agenda: The origins and impact of the Henderson report. In: R. Fincher & J. Nieuwenhuysen, ch. 3.
390. SAUNDERS, PETER (1998b), Using budget standards to assess the well-being of families, SPRC Discussion Paper. http://www.sprc.unsw.edu.au/dp/index.htm
391. SAUNDERS, PETER R. (1984), Beyond housing classes: The sociological significance of private property rights and means of consumption. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 8(2), pp. 202-227.
392. SAUNDERS, PETER R. (1990), A nation of home owners. London: Unwin Hyman.
393. SCHALOCK, R. (1995), Outcome - based evaluation. New York: Plenum Press.
394. SCHMIDT, S. (1989), Convergence theory, labour markets and corporatism: The case of housing. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 6(2), pp. 83-101.
395. SCHUTJENS, V.A.J.M., R. VAN KEMPEN & J. VAN WEESEP (2002), The changing tenant profile of Dutch social rented housing. Urban Studies 39(4), pp. 643-664.
396. SCP (SOCIAL AND CULTURAL PLANNING OFFICE) (2001), The Netherlands in a European perspective. English translation. Social and Cultural Report 2000. The Hague: SCP. http://www.scp.nl/english/publications/english/20010426/index.html
397. SCP/CBS (1999), Poverty monitor 1999. The Hague: SCP. http://www.scp.nl/boeken/cahiers/cah163/uk/metainfo.htm
398. SCP/CBS (2000), Poverty monitor 2000. The Hague: SCP. http://www.scp.nl/boeken/titels/2000-6/uk/metainfo.htm
399. SCRCSSP (STEERING COMMITTEE FOR THE REPORT OF COMMONWEALTH/STATE SERVICE PROVISION (2001), Report on government services 2001, volume 2. Melbourne: Productivity Commission. http://www.pc.gov.au/gsp/2001/index.html
400. SCRCSSP (2002), Report on government services 2002, volume 2. Melbourne: Productivity Commission. http://www.pc.gov.au/gsp/2002/index.html
401. SEELIG, T. (2001), The political economy of private rental housing in Brisbane. PhD thesis. Melbourne: Swinburne University of Technology.
402. SELECT COMMITTEE UPON HOMEFUND AND FANMAC (1994), Report. Sydney: Parliament of New South Wales.
403. SMITH, J.E. (1997), What determines housing investment? An investigation into the social, economic and political determinants of housing investment in four European countries. Housing and Urban Policy Studies no. 12. Delft: Delft University Press.
404. SMITH, L.B., K.T. ROSEN & G. FALLIS (1988), Recent developments in economic models of housing markets. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(March), pp. 29-64.
405. SMITH, N. (1979), Towards a theory of gentrification. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 45, pp. 538-548.
406. SMITH, N. & P. WILLIAMS, eds. (1996), Gentrification of the city. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
407. SOMERVILLE, P. (1994), On explanations of housing policy. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 11, pp. 210-230.
408. SPILLER GIBBONS SWAN PTY LTD (2000), Public housing estate renewal in Australia. Australian Housing Research Fund Project no. 212. Canberra: Department of Family and Community Services.
409. STILWELL, F. (1980), Economic crisis city and regions. Sydney: Pergamon.
410. STILWELL, F. (1993), Reshaping Australia. Urban problems and policies. Sydney: Pluto Press.
411. STILWELL, F. & P. TROY (2000), Multilevel governance and urban development in Australia. Urban Studies 37(5/6), pp. 909-930.
412. STOUTEN, P. (2000), Divisions in Dutch cities. City 4(3), pp. 341-362.
413. TER RELE, H. & G. VAN STEEN (2001), Housing subsidisation in the Netherlands. CPB Discussion Paper no. 2. The Hague: Central Plan Bureau. http://www.cpb.nl/eng/pub/discussie/2/
414. TERHORST, P. & J. VAN DE VEN (1997), Fragmented Brussels and consolidated Amsterdam: A comparative study of the organisation of property rights. Netherlands Geographical Studies no. 223. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
415. st August, pp. 53-54. London: The Economist Ltd.
416. THERBORN, G. (1989), 'Pillarization and popular movements' two variants of welfare state capitalism: The Netherlands and Sweden. In: F. Castles, ch. 6.
417. THRIFT, N. (1994), Globalisation, regulation, urbanisation: The case of the Netherlands. Urban Studies 31(3), pp. 365-380.
418. TORGENSON, U. (1987), Housing: The wobbly pillar under the welfare state. In: B. Turner, J. Kemeny and L.J. Lundqvist, eds., (1987) Between state and market: Housing in the post industrial era. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wicksell International.
419. TROY, P. (1978), A fair price: The land commission program 1972-1977. Sydney: Hale and Iremonger.
420. TROY, P. (1991), The benefits of owner occupation. Working Paper Series no. 29, Urban Research Program. Canberra: Australian National University.
421. TROY, P., ed. (1995), Cities - issues, strategies and policies for urban Australia in the 1990s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
422. TROY, P. (1996a), The perils of urban consolidation. Sydney: The Federation Press.
423. TROY, P. (1996b), Introductory remarks. The end of public housing? Urban Research Program, Canberra: Australian National University.
424. VAN DER HEIJDEN, H. (2002), Social rented housing in Western Europe: Developments and expectations. Urban Studies 39(2), pp. 327-340.
425. VAN DER HEIJDEN, H. & M.E.A. HAFFNER (2000), Housing expenditure and housing policy in the western European rental sector. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 15(1), pp. 71-92.
426. VAN DER SCHAAR, J. (1987a), Groei en bloei van het Nederlandse volkshuisvesting beleid. Volkshuisvesting in Theorire en Praktijk no. 7. Delft: Delft University Press.
427. VAN DER SCHAAR, J. (1987b), De non-profit huursector: Woningbeheer En-Exploitatie. Volkshuisvesting in Theorire en Praktijk no. 10. Delft: Delft University Press.
428. VAN FULPEN, H. (1986), A comparison of the development of expenditure on housing in various OECD countries during the period 1964-1981. Netherlands Journal of Housing and Environmental Research 1(1), pp. 52-68.
429. VAN KEMPEN, R. (2001), Social exclusion: The importance of context. In: H. Andersen & R. van Kempen, eds., Governing European cities, social fragmentation, social exclusion and urban governance, ch. 3. Ashgate: Aldershot.
430. VAN KEMPEN, R., R. TEULE & J. VAN WEESEP (1992), Urban policy, housing policy and the demise of the Dutch welfare state. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 83(4), pp. 317-329.
431. VAN KEMPEN, R. & J. VAN WEESEP (1997), Segregation, housing and ethnicity in Dutch cities. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 88(2), pp. 188-195.
432. VAN KEMPEN, R. & H. PRIEMUS (1999), Undivided cities in the Netherlands: Present situation and political rhetoric. Housing Studies 14(5), pp. 641-657.
433. VAN KEMPEN, R., V.A.J.M. SCHUTJENS & J. VAN WEESEP (2000), Housing and social fragmentation in the Netherlands. Housing Studies 15(4), pp. 505-531.
434. VAN KEMPEN, R. & H. PRIEMUS (2002), Revolution in social housing in the Netherlands: Possible effects of new housing policies. Urban Studies 39(2), pp. 237-253.
435. VAN KERSBERGEN, K. & U. BECKER (1988), The Netherlands: A passive social democratic welfare state in a christian democratic ruled society. Journal of Social Policy 17(4), pp. 477-499.
436. VAN KERSBERGEN, K. (1995), Social capitalism. London: Routledge.
437. VAN PRAAG, C.S. & W. UITTERHOUEVE (1999), Twenty five years of social change in the Netherlands. Social and Cultural Report, 1998. Rijswijk: SCP. http://www.scp.nl/english/publications/english/19990915/index.html
438. VAN VLIET, W., ed. (1990), International handbook of housing policies and practices. New York: Greenwood Press.
439. VAN VLIET, W., ed. (1998), The encyclopedia of housing. Sage, California: Thousand Oaks.
440. VAN WEESEP, J. (1981), Production and allocation of housing the case of the Netherlands. Geografische en Planologische Notities no. 11. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.
441. VAN WEESEP, J. & R. VAN KEMPEN (1993), Low income and housing in the Dutch welfare state. In: G. Hallett, ch. 7.
442. VISSER, J. & A. HEMERIJCK (1997), 'A Dutch miracle'. Job growth, welfare reform and corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
443. WHITEHEAD, C. (1991), From need to affordability: An analysis of UK housing objectives. Urban Studies 28(6), pp. 871-887.
444. WILDEBOER SCHUT, J.M., J.C. VROOMAN. & P.T. DE BEER (2001), On worlds of welfare. The Hague: SCP.
445. WILENSKY, H. (1975), The welfare state and equality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
446. WINTER, I. & L. BRYSON (1998), Economic restructuring and state intervention in Holdenist suburbia: Understanding urban poverty in Australia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 22(1), pp. 60-75.
447. WINTER, I. & W. STONE (1998), Social polarisation and housing careers. Exploring the interrelationship of labour and housing markets in Australia. Working Paper no. 13. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
448. WOLF, C. JR. (1993), Markets or governments. Choosing between imperfect alternatives. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
449. WOOD, G. (1990), Housing finance subsidy systems in Australia, Urban Studies 27(6), pp. 847-876.
450. WOOD, G. (2001), Promoting the supply of low income rental housing. Urban Policy and Research 19(4), pp. 425-440.
451. WOOD, G. & S. BUSHE-JONES (1991), Housing affordability: An international context. The National Housing Strategy Background Paper 3, Canberra: AGPS.
452. WORLD BANK (1993), Housing. Enabling markets to work. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
453. WULFF, M. (1997), Understanding the private rental market: A new approach. In: AHURI, pp. 57-67.
454. WULFF, M. (2000a), Changing families, changing households: Australian housing assistance policy. In: L. Hancock, B. Howe & A. O'Donnell, eds., Reshaping Australian social policy, ch. 3. Melbourne: Committee for Economic Development Australia (CEDA).
455. WULFF, M. (2000b), The 1998 national survey of rent assistance recipients: A report on key findings. Canberra: FACS (Department of Family and Community Services). http://www.facs.gov.au
456. WULFF, M. & P. NEWTON (c. 1995), The dynamics of public housing tenure: Movement in and out of the public housing stock. Melbourne: AHURI.
457. WULFF, M. & C. MAHER (1998), Long-term renters in the Australian housing market. Housing Studies 13(1), pp. 83-98.
458. WULFF, M. & S. EVANS (1999), The spatial impacts of Commonwealth rent assistance on Australia's low-income households. In: J. Yates & M. Wulff, ch. 7.
459. WULFF, M. & J. YATES. (WITH T. BURKE) (2001), Low rent housing in Australia. Australian Housing Research Fund Project no. 213. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.facs.gov.au/internet/facsinternet.nsf/aboutfacs/programs/ house-lowrent.htm
460. YATES, J. (1987), Housing affordability: An economic perspective. In: B. Judd, pp. 9-17.
461. st quarter), pp. 3-15.
462. YATES, J. (1997), Changing directions in Australian housing policies: The end of muddling through? Housing Studies 12(2), pp. 265-277.
463. YATES, J. (1998), Trends in home ownership. Revised edition. Sydney: Department of Urban Affairs and Planning.
464. YATES, J. (2000a), Is Australia's home-ownership rate really stable? An examination of change between 1975 and 1994. Urban Studies 37(2), pp. 319-342.
465. YATES, J. (2000b), Housing and taxation. In: J. Head & R. Krever, eds., Taxation towards 2000, ch. 19. Melbourne: Australian Tax Research Foundation (Deakin University).
466. YATES, J. (2001), The rhetoric and reality of housing choice: The role of urban consolidation. Urban Policy and Research 19(4), pp. 491-527.
467. YATES, J. (2002a), A spatial analysis of trends in housing markets and changing patterns of household structure and income. Positioning Paper. Melbourne: AHURI. http://www.ahuri.edu.au/attachments/pp_spatialanalysis.pdf
468. YATES, J. (2002b), Housing implications of social, spatial and structural change. Final Paper, Melbourne: AHURI. http://www.ahuri.edu.au/attachments/final_socialspatial.pdf.
469. YATES, J. (2003), The more things change? An overview of Australia's recent home ownership policies. European Journal of Housing Policy 3(1): forthcoming.
470. YATES, J. & M. WULFF, eds. (1997), Australia's housing choices. AHURI, Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.
471. YATES, J. & C. WHITEHEAD (1998), In defence of greater agnosticism: A response to Galster's 'Comparing demand-side and supply-side housing policies'. Housing Studies 13(3), pp. 415-423.
472. YATES, J. & C. WULFF (2000), W(h)ither low cost private rental housing? Urban Policy and Research 18(1), pp. 45-64.