Reproducibility of the Roth power centric in determining centric relation

Seminars in Orthodontics

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 102-108

  Schmitt, Marian Elizabeth ^a   Kulbersh, Richard ^a   Freeland, Theodore ^b   Bever, Keith ^b   Pink, Frank Eric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BITE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT FUNCTION; MALE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; OPERATOR; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; REGISTRATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCHOOL CHILD; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT;

EID: 0037924479     PISSN: 10738746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/sodo.2003.34031     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Roth RH. Functional occlusion for the orthodontist. J Clin Orthod 1981;15:32-51.
2. Posselt U. Physiology of Occlusion and Rehabilitation (ed 2). Oxford, Blackwell, 1968.
3. Teo CS, Wise MD. Comparison of retruded axis articular mountings with and without applied muscular force. J Oral Rehab 1981;8:363-376.
4. Piehslinger E, Celar A, Jager W, Slavicek R. Reproducibility of the condylar reference position. J Orofacial Pain 1993;7:68-75.
5. Okeson JP. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion (ed 3). St Louis, MO, Mosby Year Book, 1998;109-125.
6. Williamson EH. Occlusal concepts in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment. In: Johnson LE (ed). New Vistas in Orthodontics. Philadelphia, PA, Lea and Febiger, 1985; 122-147.
7. Dawson PE. Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Occlusal Problems. St Louis, MO, CB Mosby, 1989
8. Phillips RW, Hamilton AI, Jendersen MD. Report of Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55:736-772.
9. Long JH, Thompon JR. Anatomic and physiologic consideration for the position of the mandible. Aust Dent J 1952;2:160-171.
10. Long JH. Location of the terminal hinge axis by intraoral means. J Prosthet Dent 1970;23:11-24.
11. Wu CZ, Chou SL, Ash MM. Centric discrepancy associated with TM disorders in young adults. J Dent Res 1990;69:334 (abstr).
12. Shanahan TEJ. Physiologic jaw relation and occlusion of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1955;5:319-324.
13. McCollum BB. Function - Factors that make mouth and teeth a vital organ. J Am Dent Assoc 1927;14:1261-1271.
14. Granger ER. Centric relation. J Prosthet Dent 1952;2: 160-171.
15. Lucia VO. A technique for recording centric relation. J Prosthet Dent 1964;14:492-505.
16. Ludeen HC. Centric relation records: The effect of muscle action. J Prosthet Dent 1974;31:244-253.
17. Wood DP, Floreani KJ, Galil KA, Teteruck WR. The effect of incisal bite force on condylar seating. Angle Orthod 1994;64:321-330.
18. Roth RH. Gnathologic considerations for orthodontic Therapy. In: McNeil C (ed). Science and Practice of Occlusion. Chicago, IL, Quintessence, 1997;506-507.
19. Wood DP, Elliott RW. Reproducibility of the centric relation bite registration technique. Angle Orthod 1994; 3:211-220.