Operative therapy of the stool-incontinence;Operative therapie der stuhlinkontinenz

Therapeutische Umschau

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 289-295

  Buchmann, Peter ^a  

^a Chirurgische Klinik Stadtspital Waid   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANORECTAL PRESSURE; ANUS SPHINCTER; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONSTIPATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEFECATION; DEFECOGRAPHY; DIARRHEA; DIETARY INTAKE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ENTEROSTOMY; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FLATULENCE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INFLAMMATION; NERVE STIMULATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERINEUM; PROCTITIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 0037910275     PISSN: 00405930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/0040-5930.60.5.289     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Rasmussen OØ, Christiansen J, Tetschner T, Sørensen M. Pudendal function in idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 633-7.
2. Buchmann P, Mishra S. Pathophysiology of the pelvic floor. In: Frühmorgen P, Bruch HP, ed. Non-neoplastic diseases of the anorectum. Falk symposium 118. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer academic Publishers 2001; 12-25.
3. Buchmann P. Defäkationsprobleme. In: Buchmann P. Ed. Lehrbuch der Proktologie 4. Auflage. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber 2002; 190-206.
4. Buchmann P. Klinische und instrumentelle Untersuchungstechnik; starre Rektoskopie und fiberoptische Koloskopie. In: Buchmann P. Ed. Lehrbuch der Proktologie 4. Auflage. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber 2002; 26-45.
5. Buchmann P, De Lorenzi D, Müller A. Reeingriffe bei sekundärer Inkontinenz. Chirurg 1996; 67: 491-7.
6. Jensen LL, Lowry AC. Biofeedback improves functional outcome after sphincterplasty. Dis. Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 197-2000.
7. Pinho M, Ortiz J, Oya M. Total pelvic floor repair for the treatment of neurogenic fecal incontinence. Am J Surg 1992; 163: 340-3.
8. Baeten CGMI, Bailey HR, Bakka A et al. Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Report of a prospective trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 743.
9. Wexner SD, Baeten C, Bailey HR, et al. Long-term efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 809-18.
10. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Hohenberger W. Chronic sacral spinal nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: long-term results with foramen and cuff electrodes. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 59-66.
11. Christiansen J, Lorentzen M. Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal incontinence. Lancet 1987; 244-5.
12. Lehur PA, Roig JV, Duinslaeger M. Artificial anal sphincter. Prospective clinical and manometric evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1100-6.
13. Keller F, Kilgus E. Kosten und Nutzen des Spitals Samedan für den Kreis Oberengadin - eine regionale Wertschöpfungsanalyse. Academia Engadina, Samaden 2001.
14. Sokolovic E, Buchmann P, Schlomowitsch F. Comparison of recource utilisation and quality of life outcome between laparoscopic and conventional colorectal surgery. In Vorbereitung.
15. Porter JA, Salvati EP, Rubin RJ, Eisenstat TE. Complications of colostomies. Dis Colon Rectum 1989; 32: 299-303.
16. Adang EM, Engel GL, Rutten FF, Geerdes BP, Baeten CG. Cost-effectiveness of dynamic graciloplasty in patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 725-33.
17. Lehur PA, Zerbib F, Neunlist M, Glemain P, Bruley des Varannes S. Comparison of quality of life and anorectal function after artificial sphincter implantation. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 508-13.