In situ reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction: A novel technique for detection of rabies virus RNA in murine neuroblastoma cells

Acta Virologica

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 57-59

  Jayakumar, R ^a   Tirumurugaan, K G ^a   Gangal, G ^a   Sheela, K P ^a   Vijayarani, K ^a   Nainar, A M ^a  

^a MADRAS VETERINARY COLLEGE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VIRUS RNA;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANIMAL CELL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC CONSERVATION; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; LETTER; MOUSE; NEUROBLASTOMA CELL; NONHUMAN; RABIES VIRUS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VIRUS ISOLATION;

ANIMALS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; MICE; NEUROBLASTOMA; RABIES; RABIES VIRUS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, VIRAL; RNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; TUMOR CELLS, CULTURED;

ANIMALIA; MURINAE; RABIES VIRUS;

EID: 0037908960     PISSN: 0001723X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Saiki RK, Scharf S, Faloona F, Mullis K B, Horn G T, Science 230, 1350-1354, 1985.
2. Bourhy H, Rollin PE, Vincent J, Sureau P, J. Clin. Microbiol. 27, 519-523, 1989.
3. Dean DJ, Abelseth MK, In Kaplan MM, Koprowski H (Eds): Laboratory Techniques in Rabies. 3rd ed., World Health Organization, Geneva, pp. 73-84, 1973.
4. Nuovo GJ, PCR Methods Appl. 4, 151-167, 1995.
5. Scramento D, Bourhy H, Tordo N, Mol. Cel. Probes 5, 229-240, 1991.
6. Jackson C, Reimer DL, Wunner WH, J. Virol. Methods 25, 1-12, 1989.