Crab spiders affect flower visitation by bees

Oikos

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 157-163

  Dukas, Reuven ^a   Morse, Douglass H ^b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEE; FLOWER VISITING; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; POLLINATOR; SPIDER;

ANIMALIA; APIDAE; APIS MELLIFERA; APOIDEA; ARANEAE; ASCLEPIAS; BOMBUS TERNARIUS; BOMBUS TERRICOLA; BOMBUS VAGANS; DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); HYMENOPTERA; TERRICOLA; THOMISIDAE;

EID: 0037906591     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12143.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Abramson, C. I. 1986. Aversive conditioning in honey bees (Apis mellifera). - J. Comp. Psychol. 100: 108-116.
2. Ambrose, J. T. 1990. Birds. - In: Morse, R. A. and Nowogrodzki, R. (eds), Honey bee pests, predators, and diseases. Cornell Univ. Press, pp. 243-160.
3. Balduf, W. V. 1939. Food habits of Phymata pennsylvanica americana Melin (Hemip.). - Can. Entomol. 71: 66-75.
4. Caron, D. M. 1990. Other insects. - In: Morse, R. A. and Nowogrodzki, R. (eds), Honey bee pests, predators, and diseases. Cornell Univ. Press, pp. 156-176.
5. Cartar, R. V. 1991. Colony energy requirements affect response to predation risk in foraging bumble bees. - Ethology 87: 90-96.
6. Chittka, L. 2001. Camouflage of predatory crab spiders on flowers and the colour perception of bees (Aranida: Thomisidae/Heymenoptera: Apidae). - Entomol. Gener. 25: 181-187.
7. Clark, C. W. and Dukas, R. 1994. Balancing foraging and antipredator demands: an advantage of sociality. - Am. Nat. 144: 542-548.
8. Craig, C. L. 1994. Limits to learning: effects of predator pattern and colour on perception and avoidance-learning by prey. - Anim. Behav. 47: 1087-1099.
9. De Jong, D. 1990. Insects: hymenoptera (ants, wasps, and bees). - In: Morse, R. A. and Nowogrodzki, R. (eds), Honey bee pests, predators, and diseases. Cornell Univ. Press, pp. 135-155.
10. Dukas, R. 2001a. Effects of perceived danger on flower choice by bees. - Ecol. Lett. 4: 327-333.
11. Dukas, R. 2001b. Effects of predation risk on pollinators and plants. - In: Chittka, L. and Thomson, J. (eds), Cognitive ecology of pollination. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 214-236.
12. Dukas, R. and Edelstein-Keshet, L. 1998. The spatial distribution of colonial food provisioners. - J. Theoret. Biol. 190: 121-134.
13. Evans, H. E. and Eberhard, J. W. 1970. The wasps. - Univ. of Michigan Press.
14. Evans, E. E. and O'Neill, K. M. 1988. The natural history and behavior of North American beewolves. - Cornell Univ. Press.
15. Free, J. B. 1966. The foraging behaviour of bees and its effect on the isolation and speciation of plants. - In: Hawkes, J. G. (ed.), Reproductive biology and taxonomy of vascular plants. Pergamon Press, pp, 76-92.
16. Fry, C. H. 1983. Honeybee predation by bee-eaters, with economic considerations. - Bee World 64: 65-78.
17. Gould, J. L. 1987. Honey bees store learned flower-landing behaviour according to time of day. - Anim. Behav. 35: 1579-1581.
18. Greco, C. F. and Kevan, P. G. 1995. Patch choice in the anthophilous ambush predator Phymata americana: improvement by switching hunting sites as part of the initial choice. - Can. J. Zool. 73: 1912-1917.
19. Heinrich, B. 1976. The foraging specialization of individual bumblebees. - Ecol. Monogr. 46: 105-128.
20. Lima, S. L. 1991. Energy, predators and the behaviour of feeding hummingbirds. - Evol. Ecol. 5: 220-230.
21. Lima, S. L. 1998. Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions. - BioScience 48: 25-34.
22. Lima, S. L. and Dill, L. M. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. - Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.
23. Louda, S. M. 1982. Inflorescence spiders: a cost/benefit analysis for the host plant, Haplopappus venetus (Asteraceae). - Oecologia 55: 185-191.
24. Miller, R. S. and Gass, C. L. 1985. Survivorship in hummingbirds: is predation important? - Auk 102: 175-178.
25. Morse, D. H. 1979. Prey capture by the crab spider Misumena calycina (Arcaneae: Thomisidae). - Oecologia (Berlin) 39: 309-319.
26. Morse, D. H. 1981. Prey capture by the crab spider Misumena vatia (Clerck) (Thomisidae) on three common native flowers. - Am. Midl. Nat. 105: 358-367.
27. Morse, D. H. 1986a. Predation risk to insect foraging at flowers. - Oikos 46: 223-228.
28. Morse, D. H. 1986b. Inflorescence choice and time allocation by insects foraging on milkweed. - Oikos 46: 229-236.
29. Peacor, S. D. and Werner, E. E. 2000. Predator effects on an assemblage of consumers through induced changes in consumer foraging behavior. - Ecology 81: 1998-2010.
30. Peckarsky, B. L., Cowan, C. L., Penton, M. A. and Anderson, C. 1993. Sublethal consequences of stream-dwelling stoneflies on mayfly growth and fecundity. - Ecology 74: 1836-1846.
31. Pyke, G. H. 1979. Optimal foraging in bumblebees: rule of movement between flowers within inflorescences. - Anim. Behav. 27: 1167-1181.
32. Schmid-Hempel, P. 1991. The ergonomics of worker behavior in social hymenoptera. - Adv. Study Behav. 20: 87-134.
33. Smith, B. H., Abramson, C. I. and Tobin, T. R. 1991. Conditional withholding of proboscis extension in honey bees (Apis mellifera) during discriminative punishment. - J. Comp. Psychol. 105: 345-356.
34. Thery, M. and Casas, J. 2002. Visual systems: predator and prey views of spider camouflage. - Nature 415: 133.
35. Thomson, J. D. 1989. Reversal of apparent feeding preferences in bumble bees by aggression from Vespula wasps. - Can. J. Zool. 67: 2588-2591.
36. Thomson, J. D. and Chittka, L. 2001. Pollinator individuality: when does it matter? - In: Chittka, L. and Thomson, J. D. (eds), Cognitive ecology of pollination. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 191-213.
37. Williams, N. M. and Thomson, J. D. 1998. Trapline foraging by bumble bees. III. Temporal patterns of visitation and foraging success at single plants. - Behav. Ecol. 9: 612-621.
38. Willmer, P. G. and Stone, G. N. 1997. How aggressive ant-guards assist seed-set in Acacia flowers. - Nature 388: 165-167.