Tripartite triage concerns: Issues for law and ethics

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 31, Issue 5 SUPPL., 2003, Pages

  Hartman, Rhonda Gay ^a  

^a DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EMERGENCY WARD; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; LAW; MALPRACTICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; REVIEW;

EID: 0037906212     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000065130.18337.05     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Fifth Edition. New York, Oxford University Press, 2000
2. Baker R, Strosberg M: Triage and equality: An historical reassessment of utilitarian analyses of triage. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1992; 2:103-123
3. Camus A: The Plague. New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1948
4. Colo Rev Stat Section 25-3.5-401 (2002)
5. Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee: Consensus statement on the triage of critically ill patients. JAMA 1994; 271:1200-1203
6. Bosch X: Baby dies after long wait in casualty. BMJ 2000; 321:726
7. Lyons v Walker Regional Medical Ctr, 791 So 2d 937 (Ala 2000)
8. Clark v Baton Rouge Gen Medical Ctr, 657 So. 2d 741 (La App 1995).
9. Cruzan v Dir., Mo Department of Health, 497 US 261 (1990)
10. In re Duran, 769 A. 2d 497 (Pa. Super. 2001)
11. Hartman RG: Coming of age: Devising legislation for adolescent medical decision making. Am J Law Med 2002; 28:409-453
12. Moore v Regents of the University of California, 793 P 2d 479 (Cal 1990)
13. Brillman JC, Doezema D, Tandberg D, et al: Triage: Limitations in predicting need for emergent care and hospital admission. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 27:493-499
14. Truman v Thomas, 611 P. 2d 902 (Cal. 1980).
15. Fried C: Rights and health care: Beyond equity and efficiency. N Engl J Med 1975; 293:241-243
16. Norris R: Who Should Go to the CCU in 1993? Lancet 1993; 341:212
17. O'Sullivan ST., et al, Influence of Teaching on the Triage of Multiple Injury Patients. Br J Clinical Practice. (1996); 50(2):85-87
18. Vacco v Quill, 521 US 793 (1997); N H Rev Stat Ann Section 153-A:20 (2002)
19. Nev Rev Stat Section 41.503(b) (2002)
20. Ariz Rev Stat. Section 36-2232 (2001)
21. Cal Health and Safety Code Section 1798.102 (2001)
22. Md Health-Gen Code Ann Section 10-1403 (2002)
23. Ore Rev Stat Section 431.609 (2001)
24. Wyo Stat Section 35-1-802 (2002)
25. Conn Gen Stat Section 17a-679 (2001)
26. Fla Stat Section 395.401 (2002)
27. Ohio Rev Code Section 4765.12 (Anderson 2002)
28. Tex Health and Safety Code Section 773.112 (2002)
29. Wash Rev Code Section 18.73.030 (2002)
30. 77 P S Section 29 (2002)
31. Va Code Ann Section 32.1-111.3 (2002)
32. La Rev Stat Section 40:2173 (2002)
33. Mass. Gen. Laws Ann ch 111C, Sections 4, 11 (2002)
34. Shannon v McNulty, 718 A 2d 828 (Pa Super 1998)
35. Capron AM: Ethical and human-rights: Issues in research on mental disorders that may affect decision-making capacity. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:1430-1433
36. The Report of the President's Council on Bioethics: Human Cloning and Human Dignity. Washington, DC, Public Affairs Publication, 2002