Rorschach administration: A comparison of the effect of two instructions given to an inpatient sample of drug addicts

Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 133-139

  Hartmann, Ellen ^a   Vanem, Per Christian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Drug addicts; Method variance; Rorschach instruction

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RORSCHACH TEST; SAMPLING STUDIES; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 0037900737     PISSN: 00365564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9450.00331     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Acklin, M. W., McDowell, C. J., Verschell, M. S. & Chan, D. (2000). Interobserver agreement, intraobserver reliability, and the Rorschach Comprehensive System. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 15-47.
2. American Psychological Association (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611.
3. Aronow, E., Reznikoff, M. & Moreland, K. (1995). The Rorschach: Projective technique or psychometric test? Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 213-228.
4. Blais, M. A., Norman, D. K., Quintar, B. & Herzog, D. B. (1995). The effect of administration method: A comparison of the Rapaport and Exner Rorschach systems. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 100-107.
5. Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criterial, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-290.
6. Cicchetti, D. V. & Sparrow, S. S. (1981). Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 127-137.
7. Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145-153.
8. Curran, P., West, S. & Finch, J. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Method, 1, 16-29.
9. Epstein, S., Lundborg, E. & Kaplan, B. (1962). Allocation of energy and Rorschach productivity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18, 236-238.
10. Exner, J. E. (1986). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system, Vol. 1. New York: Wiley.
11. Exner, J. E. (1993). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system, Vol. 1 (3rd edn). New York: Wiley.
12. Exner, J. E. (2003). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system. Vol. 1 (4th edn). New York: Wiley.
13. Exner, J. E. & Sendin, C. (1997). Some issues in Rorschach research. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 155-163.
14. Falk, R. & Greenbaum, C. W. (1995). Significance tests die hard. Theory and Psychology, 5, 75-98.
15. Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.
16. Grønnerød, C. (1999). Rorschach interrater agreement estimates: An empirical evaluation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 115-120.
17. Hartmann, E. (2001). The effect of Rorschach administration. A comparison of two instructions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 460-470.
18. Hertz, M. R. (1936). The method of administration of the Rorschach Ink-blot Test. Child Development, 7, 237-254.
19. Hunsley, J. & Bailey, J. M. (1999). The clinical utility of the Rorschach: Unfulfilled promises and an uncertain future. Psychological Assessment, 11, 266-277.
20. Janson, H. (1999). Projective methods and longitudinal developmental research. Considerations of data's nature and reliability. Department of Psychology, University of Stockholm.
21. Killingmo, B. (1988). Rorschachmetode og psykoterapi. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
22. Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
23. Lerner, P. M. (1998). Psychoanalytic perspectives on the Rorschach. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
24. McDowell, C. & Acklin, M. W. (1996). Standardizing procedures for calculating Rorschach interrater reliability: Conceptual and empirical foundations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 308-320.
25. Meyer, G. J. (1999). Simple procedures to estimate chance agreement and kappa for interrater reliability of response segments using the Rorschach Comprehensive System. Journal of Personality Assessment, 72, 230-255.
26. Millon, T. (1994). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory - III manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
27. Nielsen, G. (1990). Med Rorschach inn i 1990-årene: En beskrivelse av status og sentrale utviklingstendenser. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 27, 243-254.
28. Rorschach, H. (1942/1921). Psychodiagnostics. New York: Grune & Stratton.
29. Rossi, J. S. (1990). Methodological contributions to clinical research. Statistical power of psychological research: What have we gained in 20 years? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 646-656.
30. Schafer, R. (1954). Psychoanalytic interpretation in Rorschach testing. Theory and application. New York: Grune & Stratton.
31. Shaffer, T. W., Erdberg, P. & Haroian, J. (1999). Current nonpatient data for the Rorschach, WAIS-R, and MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73, 305-316.
32. Wood, J. M., Lilienfeld, S. O., Garb, H. N. & Nezworski, M. T. (2000). The Rorschach Test in clinical diagnosis: A critical review with a backward look at Garfield (1947). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 395-430.
33. Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T. & Stejskal, W. J. (1996). The comprehensive system for the Rorschach: A critical examination. Psychological Science, 7, 3-10.