Disorder to order transition in the magnetic and electronic properties

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 61, Issue 13, 2000, Pages 8878-8887

  Sullow S ^a   Mentink, S ^b   Mason, T ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037899856     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.8878     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. R.J. Cargill III, in Solid State Physics, edited by F. Seitz and D. Turnbull (Academic Press, New York, 1975), Vol. 30.
2. J. Dugdale, Contemp. Phys. 28, 547 (1987);The Electrical Properties of Disordered Metals (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
3. N. Mott, Metal-Insulator Transitions, 2nd ed. (Taylor & Francis, London, 1990).
4. J.A. Mydosh, Spin Glasses: An Experimental Introduction (Taylor & Francis, London, 1993).
5. A.F. Ioffe and A.R. Regel, Prog. Semicond. 4, 237 (1960).
6. A. Jagannathan, E. Abrahams, and M. Stephen, Phys. Rev. B 37, 436 (1988).
7. Phys. Rev. BI.V. Lerner, 48, 9462 (1993).
8. E. Miranda, V. Dobrosavljević, and G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 290 (1997).
9. A.H. Castro-Neto, G. Castilla, and B.A. Jones, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3531 (1998).
10. S. Süllow et. al Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 354 (1997).
11. S. SüllowPhysica B 230-232, 105 (1997).
12. R. Feyerherm et. al (unpublished).
13. J.H. Mooij, Phys. Status Solidi A 17, 521 (1973).
14. P.A. Lee and T.V. Ramakrishnan, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 287 (1985).
15. G. Bergmann, Phys. Rep. 107, 1 (1984).
16. C.C. Tsuei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1943 (1986).
17. G. Holter, H. Adrian, and B. Hensel, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 63&64, 475 (1987).
18. H. Nakamura et. al J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, 4701 (1997).
19. J. Phys.: Condens. MatterJ.M. Barandiarán et. al 9, 5671 (1997).
20. A.J. Dirkmaat et. al Europhys. Lett. 11, 275 (1990).
21. Similar large, weakly T dependent resistivities with a negative (Formula presented) are frequently observed in U intermetallics, like in (Formula presented) [B. Andraka and G.R. Stewart, Phys. Rev. B 47, 3208 (1993)] or
22. Phys. Rev. B(Formula presented) [D.X. Li et. al 57, 7434 (1998)]. While in these systems crystallographic disorder certainly plays a role, the extent to which disorder controls the transport properties is still a matter of debate.
23. S. Süllow et. al (unpublished).
24. P.W. Anderson, B.I. Halperin, and C.M Varma, Philos. Mag. 25, 1 (1972).
25. These assumptions serve as specific example to illustrate the problem. They do not limit the general applicability of our model. We note however that qualitatively the competition of ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic exchange has been observed in the closely related compound (Formula presented); see C. Broholm et. al Phys. Rev. B 43, 12 809 (1991).
26. A. Krimmel et. al Phys. Rev. B 59, R6604 (1999).
27. A. KrimmelJ. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, 6991 (1999).
28. H. Ptasiewicz-Bak, J. Leciejewicz, and A. Zygmunt, J. Phys. F 11, 1225 (1981).
29. H. Ptasiewicz-BakJ. LeciejewiczA. ZygmuntSolid State Commun. 55, 601 (1985).
30. B. Lloret et. al J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 67, 232 (1987).
31. J.D. Thompson, Z. Fisk, and L.C. Gupta, Phys. Lett. A 110, 470 (1985).
32. R.B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 17 (1969).
33. A. Brooks Harris, Phys. Rev. B 12, 203 (1975).
34. Phys. Rev. BH. Rieger and A.P. Young, 54, 3328 (1996).
35. Phys. Rev. BM. Guo, R.N. Bhatt, and D.A. Huse, 54, 3336 (1996).