Effect of age on quality of fresh and frozen-thawed semen in White Italian ganders

Asian Journal of Andrology

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 89-93

  Lukaszewicz, E ^a   Kruszynski, W ^a   Fujihara, N ^b  

^a WROC AW UNIVERSITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

^b Fukuoka Women's Junior College   (Japan)

Author keywords

Age; Freezing; Gander; Poultry; Semen; Sperm morphology

Indexed keywords

N,N DIMETHYLFORMAMIDE;

AGE; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BLOOD; CELL SURVIVAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FECES; FREEZING; GOOSE; ITALY; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERM; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; THAWING;

AGING; ANIMALS; CELL SURVIVAL; FREEZING; GEESE; MALE; SEMEN; SPERM COUNT; SPERM MOTILITY; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 0037867906     PISSN: 1008682X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bielińska K. History of the domestic goose. Poultry Production (in Polish) 1979; 6: 3-5.
2. Rosiński A, Bieliński K, Bieliń ska K. The results of geese reproduction in the same flock during subsequent three years. Annals Animal Breeding Sciences (in Polish) 1986; 13: 127-32.
3. Lukaszewicz E, Furuta H, Xi YM, Fujihara N. Comparative study on semen quality of one- and two-year-old ganders during the entire reproductive season. Asian J Androl 2000; 2: 139-42.
4. Gee GF, Sexton TJ. Cryogenic preservation of semen from the Aleutian Canada goose (Branta canadensis leucopareia). Zoo Biology 1990; 9: 361-71.
5. Blanco JM, Gee G, Wildt DE, Donoghue AM. Species variation in osmotic cryoprotectant and cooling rate tolerance in poultry, eagle and peregrine falcon spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 2000; 63: 1164-71.
6. Bakst MR. Preservation of avian cells. In: Crawford RD, editor. Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Oxford, New York, Tokio: Elsevier Amsterdam; 1990. p 91-108.
7. Fujihara N, Ohboshi S. Simple and rapid cryopreservation of rooster spermatozoa. Low Temperature Medicine l991; 17: 128-31.
8. 2 application to breeding programmes. Br Poult Sci 1981; 22: 71-7.
9. Lukaszewicz E. An effective method for freezing White Italian gander semen. Theriogenology 2002; 58: 19-27.
10. Tselutin K, Narubina L, Mavrodina T, Tur B. Cryopreservation of poultry semen. Br Poult Sci 1995; 36: 805-11.
11. Tai JJ, Chen JC, Wu KC, Wang SD, Tai C. Cryopreservation of gander semen. Br Poult Sci 2001; 42: 384-8.
12. Fujihara N, Buckland RB. The effect of different freezing rates on fertilizing ability of frozen-thawed chicken spermatozoa. Jpn J Anim Reprod 1987; 33: 11-4.
13. Van Voorst A, Leenstra FR. Fertility rate of daily collected and cryopreserved fowl semen. Poultry Sci 1995; 74: 136-40.
14. Pawluczuk B, Grunder AA. Comparison of three methods of collecting semen from ganders. Poultry Sci 1989; 68: 1714-7.
15. Bielański W. Animal reproduction. PWRiL, editor (in Polish). Warszawa; 1972. p 395-401.
16. Chelmonska B. Artificial insemination in geese. (in Polish). Med Wet 1967; 7: 432-6.
17. Lukaszewicz E. Effects of semen filtration and dilution rate on morphology and fertility of frozen gander spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2001; 55: 1819-29.
18. Maeda T, Terada T, Tsutsumi Y. Studies of the factors causing abnormal acrosomes and crooked-necks in fowl spermatozoa during freezing and thawing. Br Poult Sci 1986; 27: 695-702.
19. Johnson AS. Artificial insemination and duration of fertility of geese. Poultry Sci 1954; 33: 638-40.