Silencing dissent in academia the commercialisation of science

Psychologist

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 244-246

  Miller, David ^b   Philo, Greg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037867728     PISSN: 09528229     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Abergavenny, R. D. (2002). Journals demand that authors declare their independence of sponsors. British Medical Journal, 324, 192.
2. British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy (2002, January). Can reality TV be ethical entertainment? Press release.
3. Boseley, S. (2001, 24-30 May). Bitter pill. The Guardian Weekly, p.23.
4. Carver, G. (2000). Tested to destruction? A survey of examination stress in teenagers. Derby: Professional Association of Teachers.
5. Cohen, G. (2000). Cruel Britannia: Reports on the sinsiter and preposterous. London: Verso.
6. James, O. (1998). Britain on the couch. London: Arrow.
7. McVeigh, K. (2000, 30 July). Psychologists in ethics probs over Big Brother. Scotland on Sunday, p.5.
8. Philo, G. & Miller, D. (2001). Market killing: What the free market does and what social scientists can do about it. London: Longman.
9. Presdee, M. (1997, 6 April). Society's blind date with violence. The Observer, p.28.
10. Schlesinger, P. (2001). Media research and the audit culture. In G. Philo & D. Miller, Market killing: What the free market does and what social scientists can do about it (pp.179-190). London: Longman.
11. Wells, M. (2002, 24 January). BBC halts 'prison experiments'. The Guardian, p.5.
12. Zoll, D. (2001, 21-27 March). The selling of the UC system. San Francisco Bay Guardian, pp. 12-15.