Interventional radiology in nonpalpable lesions of the breast;Radiologie interventionnelle en pathologie mammaire

Journal de Radiologie

Volumn 84, Issue 4 I, 2003, Pages 381-386

  Tardivon, A ^a   Meunier, M ^a   El Khoury, C ^a   Thibault, F ^a  

^a INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

Breast, biopsy; Breast, diseases; Breast, US

Indexed keywords

ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST LESION; BREAST TUMOR; CALCIFICATION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PALPATION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; REVIEW; SCREENING; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY;

BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 0037863145     PISSN: 02210363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. O'Higgins N, Linos DA, Blichert-Toft M, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in the surgical management of mammographically detected lesions. European Breast Cancer Working Group. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1998;87:110-2.
2. Conduite à tenir diagnostique devant une image mammographique infra clinique. In: Agence nationale d'Accréditation et d'Évaluation en santé (ANAES), eds. Synthèse des recommandations, cancer du sein. Paris, Novembre 1998:15.
3. Logan-Young WW, Janus JA, Destounis SV, et al. Appropriate role of core breast biopsy in the management of probably benign lesions. Radiology 1994;190:313-16.
4. Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, et al. The breast Imaging Reporting and Data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:35-40.
5. Zajdela A, Ghossein NA, Pilleron JP, Ennuyer A. The value of aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Experience at the Fondation-Curie. Cancer 1975;35:499-506.
6. Klijanienko J, Coté JF, Thibault F, et al. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of nonpalpable breast lesions. Institut Curie's experience with 198 histologically correlated cases. Cancer 1998;84:36-41
7. Meunier M, Le Gal M, Klijanienko J, Asselain B, Vielh P. Diagnostic des lésions mammaires non palpables: apport des ponctions cytologiques après repérage stéréotaxique. J. Radiol 1995;76:259-62.
8. Coté JF, Klijanienko J, Meunier M, et al. Stereotactic fine-needle aspiration cytology of nonpalpable breast lesions Institut Curie's experience with 243 histologically correlated cases. Cancer 1998;84:77-83.
9. Lévy L, Tristant H. Prélèvements échoguidés. La lettre du Sénologue 2002;16:17-8.
10. Dowlatshahi K, Yaremko ML, Klusken LF, Jokich PM. Non palpable lesions: findings of stereotaxic needle-core biopsy and fine needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 1991;181:745-50.
11. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, et al. Stereotaxic breast biosy with a biopsy-gun. Radiology 1990;176:741-7.
12. Elvecrog EL, Lechner MC, Nelson MT. Non palpable breast lesions: stereotaxic automated large core biopsy. Radiology 1993;188:453-64.
13. Parker SH, Klaus AJ. Performing a breast biopsy with a directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy instrument. Radiographics 1997;17:1233-53.
14. Stines J, Henrot P. Le Mammotome. La lettre du Sénologue 2002;16:14-6.
15. Grumbach Y, Baratte B. Dépistage et ponctions guidées du sein. J Radiol 2002;83:535-50.
16. Grumbach Y. Place respective des ponctions échoguidées et stéréotaxiques. J Le Sein 1994;4:152-4.
17. Sebag P, Rouyer N. Macrobiopsie par aspiration sous échographie: application avec le mammotome HH. J Le Sein 2000;10:221-9.
18. Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TS, Stereo-tactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harveting with the Mammotome. Am Surg 1996;62:738-44.
19. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, et al. Percutaneous removal of malignant mammographic lesions at stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology. 1998;206:711-5.
20. Liberman L. Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millenium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1191-9.
21. Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 2002;224:548-4.
22. Scott Soo M, Baker JA, Rosen EL, Vo TT. Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious mircocalcifications of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1007-15.
23. Liberman L, Benton CL, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, LaTrenta LR, Morris EA. Learning curve for stereotactic breast biopsy: how many cases are enough? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:721-27.
24. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni Jr FA, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ. Stereotactic, automated large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999;210:799-805.
25. Liberman L, Drotman M, Morris EA, et al. Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy, an indicator of missed cancer. Cancer 2000;89:2538-46.
26. Brenner RJ, Bassett LW, Fajardo LL, et al. Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy: a multi-institutional prospective trial. Radiology 2001;218:866-72.
27. Gilles R, Houang B, Barreau B, Henriquez C. Fiche technique: Repérage préopératoire des lésions mammaires infracliniques. La lettre du Sénologue 1998;2.
28. American College of Radiology Commission on Standards and Accreditation. Stereotactic breast biopsy accreditation program introductory memorandum. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1998.