The development of multiplex simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers to complement distinctness, uniformity and stability testing of rape (Brassica napus L.) varieties

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 106, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1091-1101

  Tommasini, L ^a   Batley, J ^a   Arnold, G M ^a   Cooke, R J ^b   Donini, P ^b   Lee, D ^b   Law, J R ^b   Lowe, C ^b   Moule, C ^c   Trick, M ^c   Edwards, K J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL BOTANY   (United Kingdom)

^c JOHN INNES CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Brassica napus; Distinctness and uniformity testing; Multiplex PCR; Simple sequence repeats (SSRs)

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKERS; DATA REDUCTION; FLUORESCENCE; MORPHOLOGY; PLANTS (BOTANY); TESTING;

VARIETY TESTING SYSTEMS;

GENETIC ENGINEERING;

BRASSICA; BRASSICA NAPUS;

EID: 0037855699     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-002-1125-8     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams H, Vaughan JG, Fenwick GR (1989) The use of glucosinolates for cultivar identification in swede, Brassica napus (L.) var napobrassica (L.) Peterm. J Sci Food Agr 46:319-324
2. Anderson JA, Chuchill GA, Autrique JE, Tanksley SD, Sorrells ME (1993) Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome 36:181-186
3. Boland CR (1996) Setting microsatellites free. Nature Med 2:972-974
4. Charters YM, Robertson A, Wilkinson MJ, Ramsay G (1996) PCR analysis of oilseed rape cultivars (Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera) using 5′-anchored simple sequence repeat (SSR) primers. Theor Appl Genet 92:442-447
5. Cooke RJ (1999) Modern methods for the cultivar identification and the transgenic plant challenge. Seed Sci Technol 27:669-680
6. Dillmann C, BarHen A, Guerin D, Charcosset A, Murigneux A (1997) Comparison of RFLP and morphological distances between maize Zea mays L. inbred lines. Consequences for germplasm protection purposes. Theor Appl Genet 95:92-102
7. Donini P, Elias L, Bougourd S, Koebner RMD (1997) AFLP fingerprinting reveals pattern differences between template DNA extracted from different plant organs. Genome 40:521-526
8. Donini P, Stephenson P, Bryan GJ, Koebner RMD (1998) The potential of microsatellites for high-throughput genetic-diversity assessment in wheat and barley. Genet Resour Crop Evol 45:415-421
9. Donini P, Cooke RJ, Reeves JC (2000) Molecular markers in variety and seed testing. In: Arenciba AD (ed) Plant genetic engineering: towards the third millennium. Elsevier Science B.V. pp 27-34
10. Ellis THN, Lee D, Thomas CM, Simpson PR, Cleary WG, Newman MA, Burcham KWG (1988) 5S ribosomal-RNA genes in Pisum - sequence, long-range and chromosomal organization. Mol Gen Genet 214:333-342
11. Gower JC (1966) Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 55:582-585
12. Hallden C, Nilsson NO, Rading IM, Sall T (1994) Evaluation of RFLP and RAPD markers in a comparison of Brassica napus breeding lines. Theor Appl Genet 88:123-128
13. Henegariu O, Heerema NA, Dlouhy SR, Vance GH, Vogt PH (1997) Multiplex PCR: critical parameters and step-by-step protocol. Biotechniques 23:504-511
14. Huhn M, Rakow G (1979) Einige experimentaelle Ergebnisse zur Fremdbefurchtungsrate bei Winterrap (Brassica napus oleifera) in Abhangigkeit von Sorte and Abstand. Z Pflanzenzuecht 83:289-307
15. Jones CJ, Edwards KJ, Castaglione S, Winfield MO, Sala F, vandeWiel C, Bredemeijer G, Vosman B, Matthes M, Daly A, Brettschneider R, Bettini P, Buiatti M, Maestri E, Malcevschi A, Marmiroli N, Aert R, Volckaert G, Rueda J, Linacero R, Vazquez A, Karp A (1997) Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Mol Breed 3:381-390
16. Karp A, Edwards KJ, Bruford M, Funk S, Vosman B, Morgante M, Seberg O et al. (1997) Molecular technologies for biodiversity evaluation: opportunities and challenges. Nature Biotech 15:625-628
17. Kresovich S, Williams JGK, McFerson JR, Routman EJ, Schaal BA (1992) Characterization of genetic identities and relationships of Brassica oleracea L. via a random amplified polymorphic DNA assay. Theor Appl Genet 85:190-196
18. Kresovich S, SzewcMcFadden AK, Bliek SM, McFerson JR (1995) Abundance and characterization of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) isolated from a size-fractionated genomic library of Brassica napus (L.) (Rapeseed). Theor Appl Genet 91:206-211
19. Law JR, Donini P, Koebner RMD, James CR, Cooke RJ (1998) DNA profiling and plant variety registration. III. The statistical assessment of distinctness in wheat using amplified fragment length polymorphisms. Euphytica 102:335-342
20. Law JR, Cooke RJ, Reeves JC, Donini P, Smith JSC (1999) Most similar varieties as a grouping tool. Plant Var Seeds 12:181-190
21. Lee D, Reeves JC, Cooke RJ (1996a) DNA profiling and plant variety registration. 1. Restriction fragment length polymorphism in varieties of oilseed rape. Plant Var Seeds 9:181-190
22. Lee D, Reeves JC, Cooke RJ (1996b) DNA profiling and plant variety registration. 2. The use of random amplified DNA polymorphisms to discriminate between varieties of oilseed rape. Electrophoresis 17:261-265
23. Mailer RJ, Scarth R, Fristensky B (1994) Discrimination among cultivars of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) using DNA polymorphisms amplified from arbitrary primers. Theor Appl Genet 87:697-704
24. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalised regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209-220
25. Mitchell SE, Kresovich S, Jester CA, Hernandez CJ, SzewcMcFadden AK (1997) Application of multiplex PCR and fluorescence-based, semi-automated allele sizing technology for genotyping plant genetic resources. Crop Sci 37:617-624
26. Mundges H, Diederichsen E, Kohler W (1989) Comparisons of isozyme patterns in resynthesized amphihaploid rapeseed (Brassica napus) and their parental species Brassica campestris and Brassica oleracea. Plant Breed 103:258-261
27. Olufowote JO, Xu Y, Chen X, Park WD, Beachell HM, Dilday RH, Goto M, McCouch S (1997) Comparative evaluation of within-cultivar variation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) using microsatellite and RFLP markers. Genome 40:370-378
28. Paetkau D, Calvert W, Stirling I, Strobeck C (1995) Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol Ecol 4:347-354
29. Plaschke J, Ganal MW, Roder MS (1995) Detection of genetic diversity in closely-related bread wheat using microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet 91:1001-1007
30. Plieske J, Strauss D (2001) Microsatellite markers for genome analysis in Brassica. I. Development in Brassica napus and abundance in Brassicaceae species. Theor Appl Genet 102:689-694
31. Poulsen GB, Kahl G, Weising K (1993) Abundance and polymorphism of simple repetitive sequences in Brassica napus L. Theor Appl Genet 85:994-1000
32. Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1993) Genetic diagnostics in plant-breeding - RAPDs, microsatellites and machines. Trends Genet 9:275-280
33. Rakow G, Woods DL (1987) Outcrossing in rape and mustard under Saskatchewan prairie conditions. Can J Plant Sci 67:147-151
34. Raybould AF, Mogg RJ, Clarke RT, Gliddon CJ, Gray AJ (1999) Variation and population structure at microsatellite and isozyme loci in wild cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) in Dorset (UK). Genet Resour Crop Evol 46:351-360
35. Roldan-Ruiz I, Dendauw J, Van Bockstaele E, Depicker A, De Loose M (2000) AFLP markers reveal high polymorphic rates in ryegrasses (Lolium spp.). Mol Breed 6:125-134
36. Saal B, Plieske J, Hu J, Quiros CF, Struss D (2001) Microsatellite markers for genome analysis in Brassica. II. Assignment of rapeseed microsatellites to the A and C genomes and genetic mapping in Brassica oleracea (L.). Theor Appl Genet 102:695-699
37. Schneider F (1986) The concept of distinctness in plant breeders' rights. In: Styles BT (ed) The systematics association special volume. Infraspecific classification of wild and cultivated plants. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 29, pp 393-397
38. Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. WH Freeman and Co, San Francisco
39. SzewcMcFadden AK, Kresovich S, Bliek SM, Mitchell SE, McFerson JR (1996) Identification of polymorphic, conserved simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in cultivated Brassica species. Theor Appl Genet 93:534-538
40. Tessier C, David J, This P, Boursiquot JM, Charrier A (1999) Optimization of the choice of molecular markers for varietal identification in Vitis vinifera (L.) Theor Appl Genet 98:171-177
41. Treuren van R (2001) Efficiency of reduced primer selectivity and bulked DNA analysis for the rapid detection of AFLP polymorphisms in a range of crop species. Euphytica 117:27-37
42. U N (1935) Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and its peculiar mode of fertilisation. Jpn J Genet 7:784-794
43. UPOV (Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants) (1978) International convention for the protection of new varieties of plants test guide-lines. UPOV, Geneva, Switzerland
44. UPOV (Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants) (1994) International convention for the protection of new varieties of plants. UPOV, Geneva, Switzerland C/28/10
45. UPOV (Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants) (1996) Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability. Rape seed (Brassica napus L. oleifera). UPOV, Geneva, Switzerland TG/36/6
46. Uzunova MI, Ecke W (1999) Abundance, polymorphism and genetic mapping of microsatellites in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Plant Breed 118:323-326
47. Waugh R, Powell W (1992) Using RAPD markers for crop improvement. Trends Biotechnol 10:186-191
48. Weir BS (1990) Genetic data analysis. Methods for discrete population genetic data. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland. Massachusetts
49. White J, Law JR (1991) Differentiation between varieties of oilseed rape Brassica napus (L.) on the basis of the fatty acid composition of the oil. Plant Var Seeds 3:125-132