Coaching and the ability to simulate mild traumatic brain injury symptoms

Clinical Neuropsychologist

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 524-535

  Cato, M Allison ^a,f   Brewster, JoAnne ^b   Ryan, Thomas ^c,d   Giuliano, Anthony J ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Independent Practice   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MALINGERING; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOMETRY; SIMULATION; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALINGERING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATIENT SIMULATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037850995     PISSN: 13854046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/clin.16.4.524.13901     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bernard, L.C., & Fowler, W. (1990). Assessing the validity of memory complaints: Performance of brain-damaged and normal individuals on Rey's task to detect malingering. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 432-435.
2. Binder, L.M. (1993). Assessment of malingering after mild head trauma with the Portland Digit Recognition Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15, 170-182.
3. Faust, D., & Guilmette, T. (1990). To say it's not so doesn't prove that it isn't: Research on the detection of malingering: Reply to Bigler. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 248-250.
4. Faust, D., Hart, K.J., & Guilmette, T.J. (1988). Pediatric malingering: The capacity of children to fake believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 578-582.
5. Faust, D., Hart, Guilmette, T.J., & Arkes, H.R. (1988). Neuropsychologists' training, experience, and judgment accuracy. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3, 145-163.
6. Frederick, R.I., Sarfaty, S.D., Johnston, J.D., & Powel, J. (1994). Validation of a detector of response bias on a forced-choice test of non-verbal ability. Neuropsychology, 8, 118-125.
7. Greiffenstein, M.F., Baker, W.J., & Gola, T. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6, 218-224.
8. Guilmette, T.J., Hart, K.J., & Giuliano, A.J. (1993). Malingering detection: The use of a forced-choice method in identifying organic versus simulated memory impairment. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 7, 59-69.
9. Guilmette, T.J., Hart, K.J., Giuliano, A.J., & Leininger, B.E. (1994). Detecting simulated memory impairment: Comparison of the Rey Fifteen-Item Test and the Hiscock Forced-Choice Procedure. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 8, 283-294.
10. Heaton, R.K., Smith, H.H., Lehman, R.A., & Vogt, A.T. (1978). Prospects for faking believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 892-900.
11. Hiscock, M., & Hiscock, C.K. (1989). Refining the forced choice method for the detection of malingering. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 967-974.
12. Larrabee, G.J. (1992). On modifying recognition memory tests for detection of malingering. Neuropsychology, 6, 23-27.
13. Lezak, M.D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Loring, D.W. (1995). Psychometric detection of malingering [On-line], Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, Seattle, WA. Available: http://www.neuro.mcg.edu/npmalinger.htm
15. Martin, R.C., Todd, M.E., Gouvier, W.D., & Niccolls, R. (1993). Effects of sophistication on the detection of malingered memory performance using a computerized forced-choice task. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15, 867-880.
16. Millis, S.R., & Putnam, S.H. (1994). The Recognition Memory Test in the assessment of memory impairment after financially compensable mild head injury: A replication. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 384-386.
17. Pankratz, L., & Binder, L.M. (1997). Malingering on intellectual and neuropsychological measures. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. New York: Guilford Press.
18. Rey, A. (1941). Psychological examination of traumatic encephalopathy. Archives de Psychologie, 28, 286-340.
19. Rey, A. (1964). L'examen clinique en psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
20. Rogers, R. (Ed.). (1988). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. New York: Guilford Press.
21. Warrington, E.K. (1984). Recognition Memory Test manual. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
22. Youngjohn, J.R., Burrows, L., & Erdal, K. (1995). Brain damage or compensation neurosis? The controversial postconcussion syndrome. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9, 112-123.
23. Zielinski, J.J. (1994). Malingering and defensiveness in the neuropsychological assessment of mild traumatic brain injury. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1, 169-184.