An empirical analysis of the inter-industrial spillover effect of information and communications technology on cost and labor - The case of Korea

Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 157-167

  Park, Gwangman ^a   Park, Yongtae ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS;

COST; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; LABOR;

KOREA;

EID: 0037850035     PISSN: 00224456     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Sakurai N, loannidis R & Papaconstantinou G, The impact of RandD and technology diffusion on productivity growth: evidence for 10 OECD countries in the 1970s and 1980s, STI Working Paper (1996).
2. Bernstein J, The structure of Canadian inter-industry RandD spillovers, and the rate of return to RandD, J Ind Econ, 37 (March, 1989) 315.
3. Hanna N. Guy K & Arnold E; The diffusion of information technology: experience of industrial countries and lessons for developing countries, World Bank Discuss Pap, 281 (1995).
4. Solow R, Technical change and the aggregate production function, Rev Econ Stat, (August, 1957) 312.
5. Terleckyj N, Effect of RandD on the productivity growth of industries: An exploratory study (National Planning Association, Washington DC) 1974.
6. Jorgenson D, Accounting for capital, in Capital, efficiency and growth, edited by G von Furstenberg (Ballinger, Cambridge) 1980.
7. Scherer F, Using linked patent and RandD data to measure interindustry technology flows, in RandD patents and productivity, edited by Z Griliches (Chicago University Press, Chicago) 1984.
8. Bernstein J & Nadri M, Research and development and intraindustry spillovers: an empirical application of dynamic duality, Rev Econ Stat, 71(2) (1989) 249.
9. Goto A, & Suzuki K, RandD capital, rate of return on RandD investment and spillover of RandD in Japanese manufacturing, Rev Econ Stat, 71(4) (1989) 555.
10. Mohnen P. New technologies and inter-industry spillovers, STI Rev, 7 (1989).
11. Griliches Z, Productivity, RandD and the data constraint, Am Econ Rev, 84 (1992) 1.
12. Nadiri M, Innovations and technological spillovers, NBER Working Paper. 4423 (1993).
13. Boskin M & Lau L, Capital, technology, and economic growth, in Technology and the wealth of nations, edited by N Rosenberg et al., (Stanford University Press, Stanford) 1992.
14. Papaconstantinou G, Sakurai N & Wyckoff A, Embodied technology diffusion: an empirical analysis for 10 OECD countries, OECD Working Paper IV (8) (1996).
15. Papaconstantinou, G, Sakurai, N & Wyekoff A, Domestic and international product-embodied RandD diffusion, Res Pol, 27 (1998) 301.
16. Leoncini R, Maggioni M & Montressor S̀. Intersectorial innovation flows and national technological system network analysis for comparing Italy and Germany, Res Pol, 25 (1996) 415.
17. Park Y & Kim M. A taxonomy of industries based on knowledge flow structure, Technol Anal Strat Manage, 11(4) (1999) 541.
18. Kuznets S, Innovative activity: problems of definition and measurement, in The Rate and direction of inventive activity, edited by R Nelson (Princeton University Press, NJ) 1962.
19. Scherer F, Inter-industry technology flows in the United States, Res Pol, 11 (1982) 227.
20. Evenson R & Puttnam J, The Yale-Canada patent flow concordance (Economic Growth Center, Yale University) 1988.
21. Sahal D, Patterns of technological innovation (Addison-Wesley, London) 1981.
22. Tijssen R, Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows, Res Pol, 30 (2001) 35.
23. Griliches Z, RandD and the productivity slowdown, Am Econ Rev, 70(2) (1980) 434.
24. OECD, The measurement of scientific and technical activity: Frascati manual (Paris) 1981.
25. Korea Industrial Technology Association (KITA). White paper on industrial technology (Seoul, Korea) Annuals.
26. Leontief W, The structure of American economy 1919-1939 (Oxford University Press, NJ) 1951.
27. Davis A, Technology intensity of US output and trade (US Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration) 1982.
28. Zellner A, An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regression of aggregation bias, J Am Stat Assoc, 57 (1962) 500.
29. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Report on the survey of RandD in science and technology (Seoul, Korea) Annuals.
30. Korea Bank, Input-output table (Seoul, Korea) 1983, 1987, 1990, 1993, 1995.
31. Hitt L & Brynjolfsson E, Information technology and internal firm organization: an exploratory analysis, J Manage Inf Syst, 14 (1996) 81.
32. Pavitt K, Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxanomy and a theory, Res Pol, 13 (1984) 343.