The hemolytic and cytotoxic properties of a zeolite-containing root filling material in vitro

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 95, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 101-108

  Thom, David C ^a   Davies, John E ^b   Santerre, J Paul ^b   Friedman, Shimon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AH 26 FILLING MATERIAL; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; GLASS IONOMER; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL; SILVER; TOOTH CEMENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZEOLITE; ZEOLITE PLUS GLASS IONOMER FILLING MATERIAL; ZEOMIC FILLING MATERIAL; BISMUTH; EPOXY RESIN; KETAC CEM; KETAC ENDO; KETAC-CEM; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; TITANIUM; ZINC OXIDE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; CYTOTOXICITY; HELA CELL; HEMOLYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; DRUG COMBINATION; DRUG EFFECT; FILTRATION; INSTRUMENTATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISMUTH; DRUG COMBINATIONS; EPOXY RESINS; FILTRATION; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HELA CELLS; HEMOLYSIS; HUMANS; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; SILVER; TITANIUM; ZEOLITES; ZINC OXIDE;

EID: 0037845044     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/moe.2003.90     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Dahlén G, Samuelsson W, Molander A, Reit C. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from the root canal. Oral Micro Immun 2000;15:309-12.
2. Friedman S, Torneck CD, Komorowski R, Ouzonian Z, Syrtash P, Kaufman A. In vivo model for assessing the functional efficacy of endodontic filling materials and techniques. J Endod 1997;23:557-61.
3. Peters LB, Wesselink PR, Buijs JF, van Winkelhoff WJ. Viable bacteria in root dentinal tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 2001;27:76-81.
4. Pitt Ford TR. The leakage of root fillings using glass ionomer cement and other materials. Br Dent J 1979;146:273-8.
5. Trope M, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with glass ionomer cement or acid etch composite resin. J Endod 1991;17:257-9.
6. Friedman S, Komorowski R, Maillet W, Klimaite R, Nguyen HQ, Torneck CD. In vivo resistance of coronally induced bacterial ingress by an experimental glass ionomer cement root canal sealer. J Endod 2000;26:1-5.
7. Herrera M, Carrión P, Baca P, Liébana J, Castillo A. In vitro antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cements. Microbios 2001;104:141-8.
8. Shalhav M, Fuss Z, Weiss EI. In vitro antibacterial activity of a glass ionomer endodontic sealer. J Endod 1997;23:616-9.
9. Patel V, Santerre JP, Friedman S. Suppression of bacterial adherence by experimental root canal sealers. J Endod 2000;26:20-4.
10. Dyer A, Morgon S, Wells P, Williams C. The use of zeolites as a slow release anthelmintic carriers. J Helminthol 2000;74:137-41.
11. Matsuura T, Abe Y, Sato Y, Okamoto K, Ueshige M, Akagawa Y. Prolonged antimicrobial effect of tissue conditioners containing silver-zeolite. J Dent 1997;25:373-7.
12. Lalh M, Titley K, Torneck CD, Friedman S. The shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement sealers to bovine dentine conditioned with common endodontic irrigants. Int Endod J 1999;32:430-5.
13. Smith DC, Williams DF, editors. Biocompatibility of dental materials, vol I. Characteristics of dental tissues and their response to dental materials. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Inc; 1982. p. 52-85, 173-8.
14. American National Standard/American Dental Association. Document no 41 for recommended standard practices for the biological evaluation of dental materials. New York: ANSI; 1982. p. 1-63.
15. Fédération Dentaire International, Commission on Dental Materials, Instruments, Equipment and Therapeutics. Recommended standard practices for biological evaluation of dental materials. Int Dent J 1980;30:149-88.
16. Ciapetti G, Granchi D, Verri E, Savarino L, Cavedagna D, Pizzoferrato A. Application of a combination of neutral red and amido black staining for rapid, reliable cytotoxicity testing of biomaterials. Biomaterials 1996;17:1259-64.
17. Oliva A, Della Ragione F, Salerno A, Riccio V, Tartaro G, Cozzolino A, et al. Biocompatibility studies on glass ionomer cements by primary cultures of human osteoblasts. Biomaterials 1996;17:1351-6.
18. Murphy WM. The testing of endodontic materials in vitro. Int Endod J 1988;21:170-7.
19. Leirskar J, Helgeland K. A methodologic study of the effect of dental materials on growth and adhesion of animal cells in vitro. Scand J Dent Res 1972;80:120-33.
20. Spångberg LSW. Correlation of in vivo and in vitro screening tests. J Endod 1978;4:296-9.
21. Wennberg A, Hasselgren G, Tronstad L. A method for toxicity screening of biomaterials using cells cultured on millipore filters. J Biomed Mater Res 1979;13:109-20.
22. Kolokuris I, Beltes P, Economides N, Vlemmas I. Experimental study of the biocompatibility of a new glass-ionomer root canal sealer (Ketac-Endo). J Endod 1996;22:395-8.
23. Beltes P, Koulaouzidou E, Kolokuris I, Kortsaris AH. In vitro evaluation of the cytotoxicity of two glass-ionomer root canal sealers. J Endod 1997;23:572-4.
24. Eriksen HM, Ørstavik D, Kerekes K. Healing of apical periodontitis after endodontic treatment using three different root canal sealers. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988;4:114-7.
25. Hensten-Pettersen A. Comparison of the methods available for assessing cytotoxicity. Int Endod J 1988;21:89-99.
26. Dillingham EO, Webb N, Lawrence WH, Autian J. Biological evaluation of polymers I. Poly(methyl methacrylate). J Biomed Mater Res 1975;9:569-96.
27. Ballinger PM, Brown BS, Griffin MM, Steven FS. Evidence for carriage of silver by sulphadimidine: haemolysis of human erythrocytes. Br J Pharmacol 1982;77:141-5.
28. Luoto D, Holopainen M, Sarataho M, Savolainen K. Comparison of cytotoxicity of man-made vitreous fibres. Ann Occup Hyg 1997;41:37-50.
29. Tyas MJ. Quantitative enzyme cytochemistry in the in vitro biocompatibility testing of dental materials. Int Endod J 1988;21:106-12.
30. Geurtsen W, Leyhausen G. Biological aspects of root canal filling materials: histocompatibility, cytotoxicty, and mutagenicity. Clin Oral Invest 1997;1:5-11.
31. Arenholt-Bindslev D, Hörsted-Bindslev P. A simple model for evaluating relative toxicity of root filling materials in cultures of human oral fibroblasts. Endod Dent Traumatol 1989;5:219-26.
32. Wennberg A. Biological evaluation of root canal sealers using in vitro and in vivo methods. J Endod 1980;6:784-7.
33. Fuss Z, Charniaque O, Pilo R, Weiss E. Effect of various mixing ratios on antibacterial properties and hardness of endodontic sealers. J Endod 2000;26:519-22.
34. Syrjänen S, Möller B, Hensten-Pettersen R. Macrophage response and hemolytic activity caused by the powder component of endodontic sealers. J Endod 1985;11:294-300.
35. Matsumoto K, Inoue K, Matsumoto A. The effect of newly developed root canal sealers on rat dental pulp cells in primary culture. J Endod 1989;15:60-7.
36. Spångberg LSW, Barbosa SV, Lavigne GD. AH26 releases formaldehyde. J Endod 1993;19:596-8.
37. Heil J, Reifferscheid G, Waldmann P, Leyhausen G, Geurtsen W. Genotoxicity of dental materials. Mutat Res 1996;368:181-94.
38. Koch MJ, Wünstel E, Günter S. Formaldehyde release from ground root canal sealer in vitro. J Endod 2001;27:396-7.
39. Kawahara H, Imanishi Y, Oshira H. Biological evaluation on glass ionomer cement. J Dent Res 1979;58:1080-6.
40. Blackman R, Gross M, Seltzer S. An evaluation of the biocompatibility of a glass ionomer-silver cement in rat connective tissue. J Endod 1989;15:76-9.
41. Pissiotis E, Spångberg L. Reaction of bony tissue to implanted silver glass ionomer and a reinforced zinc oxide-eugenol cement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:623-9.
42. Chung HA, Titley K, Torneck CD, Lawrence HP, Friedman S. Adhesion of glass-ionomer cement sealers to bovine dentin conditioned with intracanal medications. J Endod 2001;27:85-8.