Confined granular packings: Structure, stress, and forces

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 4 1, 2003, Pages 413031-413039

  Landry, James W ^a   Grest, Gary S ^a   Silbert, Leonardo E ^b   Plimpton, Steven J ^a  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYLINDERS (CONTAINERS); MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; STRESSES;

GRANULAR PACKS;

GRANULAR MATERIALS;

EID: 0037831122     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. R. M. Nedderman, Statics and Kinematics of Granular Materials (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
2. H.M. Jaeger, S.R. Nagel, and R.P. Behringer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1259 (1996).
3. S. Masson and J. Martinez, Powder Technol. 109, 164 (2000).
4. J.M.F.G. Holst, J.Y. Ooi, J.M. Rotter, and G.H. Rong, J. Eng. Mech. 125, 94 (1999).
5. J.M.F.G. Holst, J.Y. Ooi, J.M. Rotter, and G.H. Rong, J. Eng. Mech. 125, 104 (1999).
6. A.M. Sanad, J.Y. Ooi, J.M.F.G. Holst, and J.M. Rotter, J. Eng. Mech. 127, 1033 (2001).
7. J.F. Chen, S.K. Yu, J.Y. Ooi, and J.M. Rotter, J. Eng. Mech. 127, 1058 (2001).
8. D. Guines, E. Ragneau, and B. Kerour, J. Eng. Mech. 127, 1051 (2001).
9. H.A. Makse, D.L. Johnson, and L.M. Schwartz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4160 (2000).
10. L.E. Silbert, D. Ertaş, G.S. Grest, T.C. Halsey, and D. Levine, Phys. Rev. E 65, 031304 (2002).
11. H.A. Janssen, Z. Ver. Dt. Ing 39, 1045 (1895).
12. L. Vanel and E. Clément, Eur. Phys. J. B 11, 525 (1999).
13. L. Vanel, P. Claudin, J.-P. Bouchaud, M. Cates, E. Clément, and J.P. Wittmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1439 (2000).
14. D.L. Blair, N.W. Mueggenburg, A.H. Marshall, H.M. Jaeger, and S.R. Nagel, Phys. Rev. E 63, 041304 (2001).
15. D.M. Mueth, H.M. Jaeger, and S.R. Nagel, Phys. Rev. E 57, 3164 (1998).
16. L.E. Silbert, D. Ertaş, G.S. Grest, T.C. Halsey, D. Levine, and S.J. Plimpton, Phys. Rev. E 64, 051302 (2001).
17. In the Hookean case, energy drains out of the pile efficiently and additional damping is not required. For Hertzian contacts, tangential damping is required to allow the energy in the pile to dissipate in a reasonable computational time.
18. J. Schäfer, S. Dippel, and D.E. Wolf, J. Phys. I 6, 5 (1996).
19. S.J. Plimpton, J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1 (1995).
20. L. Vanel, D. Howell, D. Clark, R.P. Behringer, and E. Clément, Phys. Rev. E 60, R5040 (1999).
21. E.A. Merritt and D.A. Bacon, Methods Enzymol. 277, 505 (1997).
22. These figures were created using the raster3d program version 2.6e.
23. T.G. Mason, M.-D. Lacasse, G.S. Grest, D. Levine, J. Bibette, and D.A. Weitz, Phys. Rev. E 56, 3150 (1997).
24. C.S. O'Hern, S.A. Langer, A.J. Liu, and S.R. Nagel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 075507 (2002).
25. L.E. Silbert, D. Ertaş, G.S. Grest, T.C. Halsey, and D. Levine, Phys. Rev. E 65, 051307 (2002).
26. S. Alexander, Phys. Rep. 296, 65 (1998).
27. L. Rayleigh, Philos. Mag. 11, 129 (1906).
28. D.M. Walker, Chem. Eng. Sci. 21, 975 (1966).
29. K.J. Walters and R.M. Nedderman, Chem. Eng. Sci. 28, 779 (1973).
30. P. Evesque and P.-G. de Gennes, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 326, 761 (1998).
31. J.H. Snoeijer, M. van Hecke, E. Somfai, and W. van Saarloos, e-print cond-mat/0204277.
32. L.E. Silbert, G.S. Grest, and J.W. Landry, Phys. Rev. E 66, 061303 (2002).
33. J. Brujić, S.F. Edwards, D.V. Grinev, I. Hopkinson, D. Brujić, and H.A. Makse, Faraday Discuss. 123, 1 (2002).
34. J. Brujic, S.F. Edwards, I. Hopkinson, and H.A. Makse, e-print cond-mat/0210136.
35. J.W. Landry, G.S. Grest, and S.J. Plimpton, e-print cond-mat/0302115.
36. G. Ovarlez, C. Fond, and E. Clément, e-print cond-mat/0212228.
37. Y. Bertho, F. Giorgiutti-Dauphiné, and J.-P. Hulin, e-print cond-mat/0211510.