Auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis;Avaliação dos potenciais evocados auditivos do tronco encefálico na esclerose múltipla

Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria

Volumn 61, Issue 2 B, 2003, Pages 392-397

  Santos, Marco Aurélio Rocha ^a   Peixoto, Marco Aurélio Lana ^a   Munhoz, Mário Sérgio Lei ^a   De Almeida, Alessandra Varella ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Auditory evoked potentials; Brainstem multiple sclerosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN STEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EVALUATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE;

EID: 0037828084     PISSN: 0004282X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2003000300013     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Chiappa KH. Evoked potentials in clinical medicine. 3.Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:1-30.
2. Hood L. Clinical applications of the auditory brain response. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group. 1998:67-91.
3. Kurtzke JF, Beebe GW, Dagler B, Auth TL, Kurland LT, Defzger M D. Studies on the natural history of multiple sclerosis: clinical and laboratorial findings at first diagnoses. Acta Neurol Scand 1972;48:19-46.
4. McDonald WB. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. BMJ1989;299:635-637.
5. Jerger JF, Oliver TA, Chmiel RA, Rivera VM. Patterns of auditory abnormality in multiple sclerosis. Audiology 1986;25:193-209.
6. o P. Exame da função auditiva. In Otorrinolaringologia Prática. São Paulo: Sarvier, 1973:40.
7. Davis H, Silverman SR. Hearing and Deafness. Copyright, 1970.
8. Russo ICP, Achados imitanciométricos em pré-escolares de níveis sócio econômico baixo, médio e alto: estudo comparativo. Acta AWHO 1988;4:229-235.
9. Jasper HH. The ten twenty eletrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalo Clin Neurophysiol 1958;10:371-375.
10. American EEG Society. Clinical evoked potentials guidelines: recomended standarts for normative studies of evoked potentials, statistical analyses of results and criteria for clinically significant abnormality. J Clin Neurophysiol 1994;11:45-47.
11. Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983;13:227-231.
12. Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. Neurology 1996;46:907-911.
13. Lana-Peixoto M A, Lana-Peixoto M I V. Is multiple sclerosis in Brazil and Asia alike? Arq Neuropsquiatr 1992;50:419-425.
14. Tilbery C P, Felipe E, Baldauf CM, Peres M F P. Esclerose análise clínica e evolutiva de 214 casos. Arq Neuropsquiatr 1995;53:203-207.
15. Papais-Alvarenga RM, Santos C M M, Abreu J S, et al. Esclerose múltipla: perfil clínico e evolutivo no município do Rio de Janeiro. Rev Bras Neurol 1995;31:75-87.
16. Robinson K, Rudge P. Auditory evoked responses in multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1975;24:1164-1166.
17. Rudge P, Robinson K. Abnormaties of the auditory evoked potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain 1977;100:19-40.
18. Kjaer M. Variations of brain stem auditory evoked potentials correlated to duration and severity of multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1980;61:157-166.