Agreement between Scheimpflug photography and A-scan ultrasonography in anterior segment ocular measurements in children

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 80, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 529-534

  Tong, Louis ^a,b   Wong, Ee Hwee ^c   Chan, Yiong Huak ^c   Balakrishnan, Vivian ^b  

^a SINGAPORE NATIONAL EYE CENTRE   (Singapore)

^b SINGAPORE EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Singapore)

^c MINISTRY OF HEALTH   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Biometry; Comparative study; Epidemiology; Human; Instrument; Photography; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

PHOTOGRAPHY; SCANNING; THICKNESS MEASUREMENT; ULTRASONICS;

CLINICAL SETTING;

INTRAOCULAR LENSES;

CYCLOPLEGIC AGENT; EYE DROPS;

A SCAN; ANTERIOR EYE SEGMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; EYE MOVEMENT DISORDER; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; SCHEIMPFLUG PHOTOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 0037827011     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200307000-00014     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Lowe RF. Linear A-scan ultrasonography in the measurement of intra-ocular distances: a stand-off technique. Trans Ophthalmol Soc Aust 1967;26:72-7.
2. Mortimer A, Cruickshanks B, Trollope B. An instrument for ultrasonic biometry. Can J Ophthalmol 1977;12:318-20.
3. Jensen PK, Rask R, Olsen T. Video controlled M-mode biometry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1995;73:61-5.
4. Giers U, Epple C. Comparison of A-scan device accuracy. J Cataract Refract Surg 1990;16:235-42.
5. Urbak SF. Ultrasound biomicroscopy: I. Precision of measurements. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:447-55.
6. Foster PJ, Alsbirk PH, Baasanhu J, Munkhbayar D, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ. Anterior chamber depth in Mongolians: variation with age, sex, and method of measurement. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;124: 53-60.
7. Lam CS, Edwards M, Millodot M, Goh WS. A 2-year longitudinal study of myopia progression and optical component changes among Hong Kong schoolchildren. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:370-80.
8. Devereux JG, Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Uranchimeg D, Lee PS, Erdenbeleig T, Machin D, Johnson GJ, Alsbirk PH. Anterior chamber depth measurement as a screening tool for primary angle-closure glaucoma in an East Asian population. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118: 257-63.
9. Tong L, Wong EH, Chan YH, Balakrishnan V. A multiple regression approach to study optical components of myopia in Singapore school children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002;22:32-7.
10. Zadnik K, Mutti DO, Adams AJ. The repeatability of measurement of the ocular components. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33: 2325-33.
11. Schiffer SP, Rantanen NW, Leary GA, Bryan GM. Biometric study of the canine eye, using A-mode ultrasonography. Am J Vet Res 1982;43:826-30.
12. Krogsaa B, Fledelius H, Larsen J, Lund-Andersen H. Photometric oculometry: II. Measurement of axial ocular distances with slit-lamp microscopy: clinical evaluation, and comparison with ultrasonography. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1984;62:290-9.
13. Perkins ES. Depth measurement with the slit-lamp microscope. Br J Ophthalmol 1988;72:344-7.
14. Drexler W, Baumgartner A, Findl O, Hitzenberger CK, Sattmann H, Fercher AF. Submicrometer precision biometry of the anterior segment of the human eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38: 1304-13.
15. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Mallen EA, Gilmartin B, Wolffsohn JS. A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:458-62.
16. Eysteinsson T, Jonasson F, Sasaki H, Arnarsson A, Sverrisson T, Sasaki K, Stefansson E. Central corneal thickness, radius of the corneal curvature and intraocular pressure in normal subjects using non-contact techniques: Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2002;80:11-5.
17. Muller-Breitenkamp U, Hockwin O. Scheimpflug photography in clinical ophthalmology: a review. Ophthalmic Res 1992;24(Suppl 1):47-54.
18. Olbert D, Kehrhahn OH. Biometric constancy of the anterior eye segment as demonstrated by slit image photography according to the Scheimpflug principle. Ophthalmic Res 1992;24:27-31.
19. Sasaki K, Sakamoto Y, Shibata T, Emori Y. The multi-purpose camera: a new anterior eye segment analysis system. Ophthalmic Res 1990;22:3-8.
20. Kampfer T, Wegener A, Dragomirescu V, Hockwin O. Improved biometry of the anterior eye segment. Ophthalmic Res 1989;21: 239-48.
21. Richards DW, Russell SR, Anderson DR. A method for improved biometry of the anterior chamber with a Scheimpflug technique. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988;29:1826-35.
22. Hockwin O, Weigelin E, Laser H, Dragomirescu V. Biometry of the anterior eye segment by Scheimpflug photography. Ophthalmic Res 1983;15:102-8.
23. Vetrugno M, Cardascia N, Cardia L. Anterior chamber depth measured by two methods in myopic and hyperopic phakic IOL implant. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:1113-6.
24. Barrett BT, McGraw PV, Murray LA, Murgatroyd P. Anterior chamber depth measurement in clinical practice. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73: 482-6.
25. Holmen JB, Ekesten B, Lundgren B. Anterior chamber depth estimation by Scheimpflug photography. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2001;79: 576-9.
26. Kehrhahn OH, Olbert D. Nonlinear equations for calculating lens parameters based on Scheimpflug photographs: preliminary results. Ophthalmic Res 1992;24(Suppl 1):63-8.
27. Cook CA, Koretz JF. Methods to obtain quantitative parametric descriptions of the optical surfaces of the human crystalline lens from Scheimpflug slit-lamp images: I. Image processing methods. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1998;15:1473-85.
28. Sparrow JM, Brown NA, Bron AJ. Estimation of the thickness of the crystalline lens from on-axis and off-axis Scheimpflug photographs. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1993;13:291-4.
29. Koranyi G, Lydahl E, Norrby S, Taube M. Anterior chamber depth measurement: A-scan versus optical methods. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:243-7.
30. Wang T, Liu L, Li Z, Hu S, Yang W, Zhu X. Ultrasound biomicroscopic study on changes of ocular anterior segment structure after topical application of cycloplegia. Chin Med J (Engl) 1999;112: 217-20.
31. Cheeks LT, Summerer RW, Green K. Optimal pupil diameter for Scheimpflug slit image photography of the lens in man. Ophthalmic Res 1992;24:15-9.
32. Olbert D. The use of Sclleimpflug photography in the documentation of clinical states and in the biometry of the anterior eye segment. Ophthalmic Res 1995;27(Suppl 1):20-4.
33. Harris ML, Smith GT, Brown NA. Inter and intra observer reproducibility of the new Oxford CCD Scheimpflug camera. Eye 1991; 5(Pt 4):487-90.
34. Hamidzada WA, Osuobeni EP. Agreement berween A-mode and B-mode ultrasonography in the measurement of ocular distances. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1999;40:502-7.
35. Steele CF, Crabb DP, Edgar DF. Effects of different ocular fixation conditions on A-scan ultrasound biometry measurements. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1992;12:491-5.
36. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1: 307-10.
37. Lerman S, Hockwin O. Measurement of anterior chamber diameter and biometry of anterior segment by Scheimpflug slitlamp photography. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc 1985;11:149-52.
38. Olbert D. Optical problems of anterior chamber depth biometry by Scheimpflug photography. Ophthalmic Res 1991;23:342-7.
39. Olsen T, Nielsen PJ. Immersion versus contact technique in the measurement of axial length by ultrasound. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1989;67:101-2.
40. Coleman D, Lizzi F, Jade R, eds. Ultrasonography of the Eye and Orbit. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger. 1977:109-15.
41. Berson M, Gregoire JM, Gens F, Rateau J, Jamet F, Vaillant L, Tranquart F, Pourcelot L. High frequency (20 MHz) ultrasonic devices: advantages and applications. Eur J Ultrasound 1999;10: 53-63.
42. Schelenz J, Kammann J. Comparison of contact and immersion techniques for axial length measurement and implant power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1989;15:425-8.
43. Huebscher H, Fink W, Steinbruck D, Seiler T. Scheimpflug records without distortion: a mythos? Ophthalmic Res 1999;31:134-9.
44. Dubbelman M, van der Heijde GL, Weeber HA. The thickness of the aging human lens obtained from corrected Scheimpflug images. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:411-6.
45. Dubbelman M, Van der Heijde GL. The shape of the aging human lens: curvature, equivalent refractive index and the lens paradox. Vision Res 2001;41:1867-77.