Nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: Comparison of two low-resistance models;Presión positiva continua en la vía aérea por vía nasal en el recién nacido prematuro: Estudio comparativo de dos modelos de baja resistencia

Anales de Pediatria

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 350-356

  Gutierrez Laso A ^a   Saenz Gonzalez P ^a   Izquierdo Macian I ^a   Fernandez Gilino C ^a   Gimeno Navarro, A ^a   Gormaz Moreno, M ^a   Torres Palomares, D ^a   Morcillo Sopena, F ^a   Roques Serradilla V ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LA FE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Apnea bradycardia syndrome; Infant Flow; Medijet; Nasal CPAP; Postextubation in preterm infants; Respiratory distress

Indexed keywords

APNEA; ARTICLE; BRADYCARDIA; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INFANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEONATAL RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PREMATURITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SLEEP APNEA SYNDROME;

HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INFANT, PREMATURE, DISEASES; POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, NEWBORN; SLEEP APNEA SYNDROMES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0037819299     PISSN: 16954033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1157/13045243     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, Tooley WH, Hamilton WK. Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med 1971;284:1333-40.
2. Kattwinkel J, Fleming D, Cha CC, Fanaroff AA, Klaus MH. A device for administration of continuous positive airway pressure by the nasal route. Pediatrics 1973;52:131-4.
3. AARC clinical practice Guideline. Application of continuous positive airway pressure to neonates via nasal prongs or nasopharyngeal tube. Respir Care 1994;39:817-23.
4. Hansen O, Abdel-Hedy H, Petersen S, Greisen G. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Prenatal Neo Med 1996;1:80-91.
5. Kamper J, Wulff K. Early CPAP/minimal handling. Acta Paediatr 1993;82:900.
6. Mazzella M, Bellini C, Calevo MG, Campone F, Massocco D, Mezzano P, et al. A randomized control study comparing the Infant Flow Driver with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child 2001;85:F86-F90.
7. Aly HZ, Ades AM, El-Mohandes AE, Edwards MC. Early use of nasal prongs continuous positive airway pressure (NC-CPAP) in the extremely low birth weight infants (ELBWI). Ped Res 2000; 47:350A.
8. Moa G, Nilsson K. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure: Experiences with a new technical approach. Acta Paediatr 1993;82:210-1.
9. Moa G, Nilsson K, Zetterström H, Jonsson L. A new device for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the newborn: An experimental study. Crit Care Med 1988;16: 1238-42.
10. Ahluwalia JS, White DK, Morley CJ. Infant Flow driver or single prong nasal continuous positive airway pressure: Short-term physiological effects. Acta Paediatr 1998;87:325-7.
11. Kamper J, Ringsted C. Early treatment of idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome using binasal continuous positive airway pressure. Acta Paediatr Scand 1990;79:581-6.
12. Pandit PB, Courtney SE, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, Habib RH. Work of breathinh during constant and variable flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates. Pediatrics 2001;108:682-5.
13. Courtney S, Pyon K, Saslow J, Arnold G, Pandit P, Robert H. Lung recruitement and breathing pattern during variable versus continuous flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants: An evaluation of thee devices. Pediatrics 2001;107:304-8.
14. Davis P, Davies M, Faber B. A randomized controlled trial of two methods of delivering nasal continuous positive airway pressure after extubation to infants weighing less than 1000 g: Binasal (Hudson) versus single nasal prongs. Arch Dis Child 2001;85:F82-F5.
15. Dimitriou G, Greenough A, Kavvadia V, Laubscher B, Alexiou C, Pavlou V, et al. Elective use of nasal continuous positive airways pressure following extubation of preterm infants. Eur J Pediatr 2000;159:434-9.
16. Annibale JD, Hulsey TC, Engstrom PC, Wallin LA, Ohning BL. Randomized controlled trial of nasopharyngeal continuous positive, airway pressure in the extubation of very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 1994;124:455-60.
17. Tapia JL, Bancalari A, González A, Mercado ME. Does continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during weaning from intermittent mandatory ventilation in very low birth weight infants have risks or benefits? A controlled trial. Pediatr Pulmonol 1995;19:269-74.
18. Claris O, Salle BI, Lapillonne A, Ronin E, Picaud JC, Besnier S. Nouvelle technique de pression positive continue par voie nasale en néonatologie. Arch Pédiatr 1996;3:452-6.
19. Klausner J, Lee A, Hutchison A. Decreased imposed work with a new nasal continuous positive airway pressure device. Pediatr Pulmonol 1996;22:188-94.
20. Kavvadia V, Greenough A, Dimitriou G. Effect on lung function of continuous positive airway pressure administrered either by infant flow driver or a single nasal prong. Eur J Pediatr 2000; 159:289-92.
21. Klerk A, Klerk R. Nasal continouos positive airway pressure and outcomes of infants. J Paediatr Child Health 2001;37:161-7.
22. Morley CJ. Systematic review of prophylactic vs rescue surfactant. Arch Dis Child 1997;77:F70-F4.
23. Verder H, Robertson B, Greisen G, Ebbesen F, Albertsen P, Lundstrom K, et al. Surfactant therapy and nasal continuous positive airway pressure for newborns respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1051-5.
24. Storme LL, Truffert P, Rakza T, Lequien P. Pour et contre une utilisation précose de la pression positive continue nasale et du surfactant exogène au cours de la maladie des membranes hyalines. Arguments physiopathologiques. Arch Pediatr 1999;6: 549-55.
25. Halliday HL. Towards earlier neonatal extubation. Lancet 2000; 355:2091-2.
26. So B-Horng, Tamura M, Mishina J, Watanabe T, Kamoshita S. Application of nasal continuous positive airway pressure to early extubation in very low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child 1995;72:F191-3.
27. Davis PG, Henderson-Smart DJ. Nasal continuous positive airways pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Datase Syst Rev 2000; CD000143.
28. Robertson NJ, Hamilton PA. Randomized trial of elective continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compared with rescue CPAP after extubation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal ED 1998;79:F58-F60.
29. Ryan CA, Finer NN, Peters KL. Nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation offers no adventages over nasal continuous positive airway pressure in apnea of prematurity. Am J Dis Child 1989;143:1196-8.
30. Hascoët JM, Boutroy MJ. Traitement des apnées du prématuré. Arch Pédiatr 1998;5:546-52.
31. Martin RJ, Fanaroff AA. Neonatal apnea, bradycardia, or desaturation: Does it matter? J Pediatr 1998;132:758-9.
32. Aly HZ. Nasal prongs continuous positive airway pressure: A simple yet powerful tool. Pediatrics 2001;108:759-61.
33. Robertson NJ, McCarthy LS, Hamilton PA, Moss ALH. Nasal deformities resulting from flow driver continuous positivs airway pressure. Arch Dis Child 1996;75:F209-F12.
34. Wong W, Fok TF, Ng PC, Chui KM, To KF. Vascular air embolism: A rare complication of nasal CPAP. J Paediatr Child Health 1997;33:444-5.