Distribution of Arsenic and Copper in Sediment Pore Water: An Ecological Risk Assessment Case Study for Offshore Drilling Waste Discharges

Risk Analysis

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1309-1321

  Sadiq, Rehan ^a   Husain, Tahir ^b   Veitch, Brian ^b   Bose, Neil ^b  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

^b MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

Barite; Exposure; Monte Carlo (MC) simulations; Response; Risk; RQ; SBFs

Indexed keywords

ARSENIC; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COPPER; DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS); ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEMS; HYDROPHOBICITY; MONTE CARLO METHODS; OFFSHORE DRILLING; SEDIMENTS; WATER QUALITY;

BIOAVAILABILITY; PORE WATER;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

ARSENIC; COPPER; WATER;

ARSENIC; COPPER; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; WATER QUALITY;

CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONFERENCE PAPER; DRILL; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; MONTE CARLO METHOD; OFFSHORE OIL INDUSTRY; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEDIMENT; SIMULATION; UNITED STATES; WASTE DISPOSAL; WATER POLLUTANT; WATER POLLUTION;

ARSENIC; COPPER; ECOSYSTEM; FUEL OILS; INDUSTRY; MARINE BIOLOGY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0037819071     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2003.00403.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. (1999). National Water Quality Management Strategy. Australia and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council.
2. Booman, C., & Foyn, L. (1996). Effects of the water soluble fraction of crude oil on marine fish larvae and crustaceans. In M. Reed & S. Johnsen (Eds.), Produced Water: 2. Environmental Issues and Mitigation Technologies. Environmental Science Research, Vol. 52. New York: Plenum Press.
3. Brandsma, M. G. (1996). Computer simulations of oil-based mud cuttings discharges in the north sea. In The Physical and Biological Effects of Processed Oily Drill Cuttings. E & P Forum Report No. 2.61/202: 25-40.
4. Canadian Council of Ministers of Environment (1997). A Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment: Technical Appendices. CCME, PN1274.
5. Diamond, M. (1999). Development of a fugacity/aquivalence model of mercury dynamics in lakes. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 111, 337-357.
6. Diamond, M., Mackay, D., Poulton, D., & Stride, F. (1994). Development of a mass balance model of the fate of 17 chemicals in the bay of Quinte. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 20, 643-666.
7. Huang, H. (1992). Transport properties of drilling muds and Detroit River sediments. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA.
8. Husain, T., Sadiq, R., Mukhtasor, & Khan, A. A. (2002). Framework for ecological risk assessment: Deterministic and uncertainty analyses. In The Gulf Ecosystem: Health and Sustainability, Article 19 (pp. 199-218). The Netherlands: Elsevier Publishers.
9. Lenwood, W. H. Jr., Scott, M. C., & Killen, W. D. (1998). Ecological risk assessment of copper and cadmium in surface waters of Chesapeake Bay watershed. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 17(6), 1172-1189.
10. Ling, H., Diamond, M., & Mackay, D. (1993). Application of the QWASI fugacity/aquivalence model to assessing sources and fate of contaminants in Hamilton Harbor. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 19, 582-602.
11. Lyman, W. J., Reehl, W. F., & Rosenblatt, D. H. (1990). Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
12. Mackay, D. (1991). Multimedia Environmental Models: The Fugacity Approach. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers.
13. Mackay, D., & Diamond, M. (1989). Application of the QWASI (quantitative water air sediment interaction) fugacity model to the dynamics of organic and inorganic chemicals in Lakes. Chemosphere, 18, 1343-1365.
14. Mackay, D., Joy, M., & Paterson, S. (1983). A quantitative water, air, sediment interaction (QWASI) fugacity model for describing the fate of chemicals in lakes. Chemosphere, 12, 277-291.
15. Mackay, D., Paterson, S., & Shiu, W. Y. (1992). Generic models for evaluating the regional fate of chemicals. Chemosphere, 24, 695-717.
16. Mackay, D., Sang, S., Vlahos, P., Gobas, F., Diamond, M., & Dolan, D. (1994). A rate constant model of chemical dynamics in lake ecosystem: PCBs in Lake Ontario. Journal Great Lakes Research, 20(4), 625-642.
17. Meinhold, A. F. (1998). Framework for a Comprehensive Environmental Assessment of Drilling Fluids. National Petroleum Technology Office, Office of Fossil Energy, U.S. Dep't of Energy, Tulsa, Oklahoma, BNL-66108.
18. Melching, C. S. (1995). Reliability estimation. In V. P. Singh (Ed.), Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Chapter 3. Water Resources Publications.
19. Morgan, M.G., & Henrion, M. (1990). Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis (p. 332). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Palisade. (1997). @RISK, Risk Analysis and Simulation Add-In for Microsoft Excel. Release 1.1 User's Guide, Palisade Corporation, NY, USA 14867.
21. Reish, D. J., Geesey, G. G., Kauwling, T. J., Wilkes, F. G., Mearns, A. J., Oshida, P. S. & Rossi, S. S. (1980). Marine and estuarine pollution. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 52, 1533-1575.
22. Reish, D. J., Geesey, G. G., Oshida, P. S., Wilkes, F. G., Mearns, A. J., Rossi, S. S., & Ginn, T. C. (1981). Marine and estuarine pollution. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 53, 925-949.
23. Reish, D. J., Geesey, G. G., Wilkes, F. G., Oshida, P. S., Mearns, A. J., Rossi, S. S., & Ginn, T. C. (1982). Marine and estuarine pollution. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 54, 786-812.
24. Reish, D. J., Kauwling, T. J., & Mearns, A. J. (1976). Marine and estuarine pollution. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 48, 1439-1459.
25. Reish, D. J., Kauwling, T. J., Mearns, A. J., Oshida, P. S., & Rossi, S. S. (1977). Marine and estuarine pollution. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 49, 1316-1340.
26. Reish, D. J., Kauwling, T. J., Mearns, A. J., Oshida, P. S., Rossi, S. S., Wilkes, F. G., & Ray, M. J. (1978). Marine and estuarine pollution. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 50, 1424-1468.
27. Reish, D. J., Rossi, S. S., Mearns, A. J., Oshida, P. S., & Wilkes, F. G. (1979). Marine and estuarine pollution. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 51, 1477-1517.
28. Sadiq, R. (2001). Drilling waste discharges in the marine environment: A risk-based decision methodology. Ph.D. thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada.
29. Sadiq, R., Husain, T., Veitch, B., & Bose, N. (2001). Heavy metals distribution in the pore water: A drilling waste case study. In Proceedings of The Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Conference 2001, 30 May to 2 June, Victoria, Canada.
30. Sadiq, R., Husain, T., Veitch, B., & Bose, N. (2003). Risk management of drilling waste disposal in the marine environment: A holistic approach. Oceanic Engineering International, 7(1), 1-22.
31. Sadiq, R., Veitch, B., Husain, T., & Bose, N. (2000). Synthetic-based drilling fluids discharge in the marine environment: Water quality assessment. In Proceedings of the Third Speciality Conference on Environmental Progress in the Petroleum and Petrochemical Industries, 1-3 May, Bahrain.
32. Seaconsult Marine Research Limited. (2000). Modelled Predictions of Well Cuttings Deposition and Produced Water Dispersion of the Proposed White Rose Development. St. John's, NL: Husky Oil Operations Limited.
33. Sleath, J. F. A. (1984). Seabed Mechanics. Cambridge University: John Wiley and Sons.
34. Terra Nova Development Application. (1996). Environmental Impact Assessment. St. Johns's, NL: Petro-Canada.
35. Thatcher, M., Henriquez, L. R., & Karman, C. C. (1999). CHARM, A User Guide for the Evaluation of Chemicals Used and Discharged Offshore, Version 1.1. A CIN Revised CHARM Report III.
36. Thiobodeaux, L. J., Reible, D. D., & Fang, C. S. (1986). Transport of chemical contaminants in the marine environment originating from offshore drilling bottom deposits: A vignette model. In Pollutants in Multimedia Environment (pp. 49-64). New York: Plenum Press.
37. U.S. EPA. (1976). Quality Criteria for Water (p. 256). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
38. U.S. EPA. (1993). Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines and New Source Performance Standards for the Offshore Subcategory of the Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-821-R93-003.
39. U.S. EPA. (1995). Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines Standards for the Coastal Subcategory of the Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-821-R95-009.
40. U.S. EPA. (1996a). Summary Report for the Workshop on Monte Carlo Analysis, Risk Assessment Forum. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/630/R-96/010.
41. U.S. EPA. (1996b). The Metal Translator: Guidance for Calculating a Total Recoverable Permit Limit from a Dissolved Criterion. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-823-B-96-007.
42. U.S. EPA. (1998). Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment, Risk Assessment Forum. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-630-R-98-002F.
43. U.S. EPA. (1999a). Environmental Assessment of Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Synthetic-Based Drilling Fluids and Other Non-Aqueous Drilling Fluids in the Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-821-B98-019.
44. U.S. EPA. (1999b). Development Documents for Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Synthetic-Based Drilling Fluids and Other Non-Aqueous Drilling Fluids in the Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-821-B-98-021.
45. U.S. EPA. (1999c). Partition Coefficients for Metals in Surface Water, Soil, and Waste. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
46. U.S. EPA. (2000). Environmental Assessment of Final Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Synthetic-Based Drilling Fluids and Other Non-Aqueous Drilling Fluids in the Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-821-00-014.