Political economy of eastern enlargement of the European Union: Budgetary costs and reforms in voting rules

European Journal of Political Economy

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 685-705

  Kandogan, Yener ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Budget; D72; Enlargement; EU; F15; F42; Voting

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037814497     PISSN: 01762680     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0176-2680(00)00021-5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Allen D. Cohesion and structural adjustment. Wallace H., Wallace W. Policy-Making in the European Union. 1996;Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
2. Anderson K., Tyers R. Implications of the EC expansion for European agricultural policies, trade and welfare. Baldwin R.et al. Expanding the Membership of the European Union. 1995;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
3. Baldwin R.E.et al. The costs and benefits of eastern enlargement: the impact on the EU and central Europe. Economic Policy: A European Forum. 24:1997;127-176.
4. Banzhaf J. Weighted voting does not work: a mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Review. 19:1965;317-343.
5. Boudreaux K., Lipford J. Group size, group heterogeneity and voting rules: an application of the Buchanan-Tullock model to the European Union. European Journal of Law and Economics. 5:1998;133-152.
6. Brenton, P., Gros, D., 1993. The budgetary implications of EC enlargement. Centre for European Policy Studies, Working Document No. 78.
7. Courchene T. Stable money-sound finances. European Economy. 53:1993;European Commission, DG 2, Brussels.
8. Study on alternative strategies for the development of relations in the field of agriculture between the EU and the associated countries with a view to future accession of these countries. CSE (95). 607:1995;European Commission, DG 6, Brussels.
9. Jackson, M., Swinnen, J., 1994. A survey and evaluation of current situation and prospects of agriculture in the central and eastern European countries, with emphasis on six states with European agreements. Final Report to the European Commission. European Commission, DG 1, Brussels.
10. Preston C. Enlargement and Integration in the European Union. 1997;University Association for Contemporary European Studies, London.
11. Richter S. Advantages, disadvantages and dilemmas: considerations on the accession of central and eastern European countries to the European Union. Acta Oeconomica. 47:1995;343-356.
12. Shackleton M., Laffan B. The budget. Wallace H., Wallace W. Policy Making in the European Union. 1996;Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
13. Shapley L., Shubik M. A method for evaluating distribution of power in a committee system. Shubik M. Game Theory and Related Approaches in Social Behavior. 1954;Wiley, New York.
14. Slater J., Atkinson N. The Common Agricultural Policy and the EU Enlargement to the East. 1995;UK Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London.
15. Straffin P. The Shapley-Shubik and Banzhaf power indices as probabilities. Roth A.E. The Shapley Value, Essays in Honor of Lloyd S. Shapley. 1988;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
16. Tangermann S. Reforming the CAP: a prerequisite for eastern enlargement. Paper presented at Kiel Week Conference, Kiel, Germany:1996.
17. Tangermann S., Josling T. Pre-Accession Agricultural Policies for Central Europe and the European Union, Study for DG 1. 1994;European Commission, Brussels.
18. Widgren M. Voting power in the EC decision-making and the consequences of two different enlargements. European Economic Review. 38:1994;1153-1170.