The endoscopic operating room OR I;Le bloc opératoire endoscopique OR I

Gynecologie Obstetrique et Fertilite

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 382-387

  Dubuisson, J B ^a   Chapron, C ^a  

^a université Paris Cité   (France)

Author keywords

Communication network; Data input; Ergonomy; Operating theatre; Security; Surgical laparoscopy

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; ERGONOMICS; HOSPITAL DESIGN; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; ILLUMINATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; OPERATING ROOM; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0037803667     PISSN: 12979589     EISSN: 17696682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1297-9589(03)00060-2     Document Type: Short Survey

References (14)

1. Falcone T, Paraiso MF, Mascha E. Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:955-62.
2. Ferrari MM, Berlanda N, Mezzopane R, Ragusa G, Cavallo M, Pardi G. Identifying the indications for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomised comparison with abdominal hysterectomy in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;107:620-5.
3. Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, Mascia M, Solla E, Melis GB. Laparoscopic vs abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome [see comments]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:654-8.
4. Murphy AA, Nager CW, Wujek JJ, Ketel LM, Torp VA, Chin HG. Operative laparoscopy vs laparotomy for the management of ectopic pregnancy: a prospective trial. Fertil Steril 1992;57:1180-5.
5. Summitt Jr RL, Stovall TG, Lipscomb GH, Ling FW. Randomized comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting [see comments]. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:895-901.
6. Vermesh M, Silva PD, Rosen GF, Stein AL, Fossum GT, Sauer MV. Management of unruptured ectopic gestation by linear salpingostomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy vs laparotomy [see comments]. Obstet Gynecol 1989;73:400-4.
7. Yuen PM, Yu KM, Yip SK, Lau WC, Rogers MS, Chang A. A randomized prospective study of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the management of benign ovarian masses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177: 109-14.
8. De Poncheville L. Cœliochirurgie gynécologique en France: Instantanée 1996, Tours (France). 1998.
9. Chapron C, Querleu D, Bruhat MA, Madelenat P, Fernandez H, Pierre F, et al. Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases. Hum Reprod 1998;13:867-72.
10. Härkki-Siren P, Kurki T. A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:108-12.
11. Härkki-Siren P, Sjoberg J, Kurki T. Major complications of laparoscopy: a follow-up Finnish study. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:94-8.
12. Jansen FW, Kapiteyn K, Trimbos-Kemper T, Hermans J, Trimbos JB. Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:595-600.
13. Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Goffinet F, Bréart G, Dubuisson JB. Laparoscopic surgery is not inherently dangerous for patients presenting with benign gynaecologic pathology. Results of a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1334-42.
14. Gadonneix P, Manhès H, Le Cavorzin N. Endobloc. Le bloc de coelioscopie opératoire. Paris: Éditions Vigot; 1993.