Presenting multiple auditory signals using multiple sound cards in Visual Basic 6.0

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 125-128

  Chan, Jason S ^a   Spence, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HEARING; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MICROCOMPUTER; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; MICROCOMPUTERS; PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0037797232     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195504     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. AUDIO ENGINEERING SOCIETY (1992). AES Recommended practice for digital audio engineering: Serial transmission format for two channel linearly represented digital audio data. New York: Author.
2. CHAN, J., & SPENCE, C. (2002). Change deafness, an auditory analog of "change blindness." Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(Suppl.), 18.
3. CHERRY, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975-979.
4. CHERRY, E. C. (1954). Some further experiments upon the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 554-559.
5. LAVIE, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 451-468.
6. LAVIE, N., & Fox, E. (2000). The role of perceptual load in negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1038-1052.
7. LAVIE, N., & TSAL, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 183-197.
8. MARS, J. D. (2002). Better latent than never [Digital Pro Sound], Retrieved August 13, 2002 from http://www.digitalprosound.com/Htm/Articles/April/Audio_Latency.htm.
9. MICROSOFT. (2000). DirectX (Version 7.0a) [Computer programming language]. Redmond, WA: Author.
10. NELSON, T. W., BOLIA, R. S., ERICSON, M. A., & McKINLEY, R. L. (1998). Monitoring the simultaneous presentation of multiple spatialized speech signals in the free field. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress on Acoustics and the 135th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, 4, 2341-2342.
11. 3D. (2000). [On line]. City: Loki Entertainment Software. Retrieved 2002 from www.openal.org.
12. SPIETH, W., CURTIS, J. F., & WEBSTER, J. C. (1954). Responding to one of two simultaneous messages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 391-396.
13. STEINBERG MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES AG (2002). ASIO. Retrieved 2002 from http://www.steinberg.net/developers/ASIO2SDKAbout.phtml.
14. WOOD, N., & COWAN, N. (1995a). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: Attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 243-262.
15. WOOD, N., & COWAN, N. (1995b). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: How frequent are attention shifts to one's name in an irrelevant auditory channel? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 255-260.
16. YOST, W. A. (1997). The cocktail party problem: Forty years later. In R. H. Gilkey & T. R. Andersen (Eds.), Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments (pp. 329-347). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.