Route guidance systems: Getting it right from the driver's perspective

Journal of Navigation

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 169-177

  Burnett, Gary ^a   Joyner, Sue ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Display of information; Human factors; Land navigation; Route guidance

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037788562     PISSN: 03734633     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0373463300013266     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Ashby, M., Fairclough, S. H. & Parkes, A. M. (1991). A comparison of two route information systems in an urban environment. CEC DUTE 1 Project V1017 (BERTIE), Report no. 47, HUSAT Research Institute.
2. Burnett, G. E. & Joyner, S. M. (1996). An assessment of moving-map and symbol-based route guidance systems. To be published in Ergonomics of Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems, Noy, I. Y. (ed), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., New Jersey.
3. Burnett, G. E., May. A. J. & Ross, T. (1994). The predicttion of the effectiveness of landmarks for use within a route guidance system. CEC DUTE II Project V200$ (HARDIE), Report no. 15, HUSAT Research Institute.
4. Department of Transport (1989). Road Accidents Great Britain 1988: The Casualty Report. Transport Statistics Publicatians.
5. Dicks, L., Burnett, G. E. & Joyner, S. M. (1995). An evalution of different types and levels of route guidance information. In Robertson (ed.) Contemporary Ergonomics, pp. 193-298, Taylor and Francis, London.
6. Ekerete, K. (1993). An evalution of different means of visually representing distance route guidance information to the driver. BSc Ergonomics Thesis, Loughborough Unirersity of Technology.
7. Kishi, H. & Suigara, S. (1993). Human factors considerations for voice route guidance. SAE Technical Paper 930553.
8. Nicolle, C. A. & Stapleton, L. J. (1995). The TELAID design guidelines handbook for usability of in-vehicle systems by drivers with special needs. CEC DUTE II Project V2032 (TELND) Report no. II, HUSAT Research Institute.
9. Parkes, A.M. (1991). Data capture techniques for RTI usability evaluation. In Advanced Telematics in Road Transport, Proceedings of the DRIVE Conference, vol. 2, pp. 1440-1456. Amsterdam, North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
10. Ross, T., Nicolle, C. & Brade, S. (1994). An empirical study to determine guidelines for optimum timing of route guidance instructions. CEC DUTE II Project V2008 (HARDIE), Report no. 13, HUSAT Research Institute.
11. Ross, T., Vaughan, G., Engert, A., Peters, H., Burnett, G. E. & May, A. J. (1995). Human factors guidelines for information presentation by route guidance and navigation system. CEC DUTE II Project V2008 (HARDIE), Report no. 19, HUSAT Research Institute.
12. Rumar, K. (1988). In-vehicle information systems. International Journal of Vehicle Design, vol. 9, (4-5), pp. 548-556.
13. Southall, D. (1995). A code of practice for in-vehicle information systems. In Nar 95 : Mapping and the Display of Navigation Information, Proceedings of the Conference of the Royal Institute of Navigation.
14. Ward, N. J. & Parkes, A. M. (1994). Head-Up Displays and their automotive application : an overview of human factors issues affecting safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 26, (6), pp. 703-717
15. Wierwílle, W. W., Antín, J. F., Dingus, T. A. & Hulse, M. C. (1988). Visual attentional demand of an in-car navigatinal display system. In A. G. Gale et al (ed.) Vision in Vehicles II, pp. 307-316. Amsterdam, North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.