Speed tuning of direction repulsion describes an inverted U-function

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 17, 2003, Pages 1847-1853

  Curran, William ^a   Benton, Christopher P ^b  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^b Dept of Experimental Psychology ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Direction repulsion; Motion; Transparency

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECTIONAL VISION; DISTRACTIBILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEASUREMENT; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VELOCITY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0037784138     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00302-X     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Benton C.P., Curran W. Direction repulsion goes global. Current Biology. 13:2003;767-771.
2. Braddick O.J., Wishart K.A., Curran W. Directional performance in motion transparency. Vision Research. 42:2002;1237-1248.
3. Dakin S.C., Mareschal I. The role of relative motion computation in 'direction repulsion'. Vision Research. 40:2000;833-841.
4. de Lange H. Research into the dynamic nature of the human fovea-cortex systems with intermittent and modulated light. II. Phase shift in brightness and delay in color perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 48:1958;784-789.
5. Edwards M., Badcock D.R., Smith A.T. Independent speed-tuned global-motion systems. Vision Research. 38:1998;1573-1580.
6. Finney D.J. Probit analysis. 1971;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Findlay J.M. Estimates on probability functions: a more virulent PEST. Perception and Psychophysics. 23:1978;181-185.
8. Giese M.A. A dynamical model for the perceptual organization of apparent motion. 1999;Kluwer, Boston.
9. Hiris E. Direction repulsion spreads beyond motion boundaries. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 36:1995;S635.
10. Hiris E., Blake R. Direction repulsion in motion transparency. Visual Neuroscience. 13:1996;187-197.
11. Kelly D.H. Visual responses to time-dependent stimuli. I. Amplitude sensitivity measurements. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 51:1961;422-429.
12. Kim J., Wilson H.R. Direction repulsion between components in motion transparency. Vision Research. 36:1996;1177-1187.
13. Kim J., Wilson H.R. Motion integration over space: interaction of the center and surround motion. Vision Research. 37:1997;991-1005.
14. Lindsey D.T. Direction repulsion in unfiltered and ring-filtered Julesz textures. Perception and Psychophysics. 63:2001;226-240.
15. Marshak W., Sekuler R. Mutual repulsion between moving visual targets. Science. 205:1979;1399-1401.
16. Mather G., Moulden B. A simultaneous shift in apparent direction: further evidence for a 'distribution-shift' model of direction coding. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 32:1980;325-333.
17. Rauber H.-J., Treue S. Reference repulsion when judging the direction of visual motion. Perception. 27:1998;393-402.
18. Rauber H.-J., Treue S. Revisiting motion repulsion: evidence for a general phenomenon. Vision Research. 39:1999;3187-3196.
19. Taylor M.M., Creelman C.D. PEST: efficient estimates on probability functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 41:1967;782-787.
20. Treutwein B. Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Research. 35:1995;2503-2522.
21. Watt R.J., Andrews D.P. APE: Adaptive probit estimation of psychometric functions. Current Psychological Reviews. 1:1981;205-214.
22. Wilson H.R., Kim J. A model of motion coherence and transparency. Visual Neuroscience. 11:1994;1205-1220.
23. Wishart K.A., Braddick O.J. Direction repulsion in transparent and segregated motions. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 39:1998;S1076.