Single-trial detection in EEG and MEG: Keeping it linear

Neurocomputing

Volumn 52-54, Issue , 2003, Pages 177-183

  Parra, Lucas ^a   Alvino, Chris ^a   Tang, Akaysha ^b   Pearlmutter, Barak ^b   Yeung, Nick ^c   Osman, Allen ^d   Sajda, Paul ^e  

^a SARNOFF CORPORATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^e Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Brain computer interface (BCI); High density electroencephalography (EEG); Linear integration; Magnetoencephalography (MEG); Single trial analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL METHODS;

SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

NEUROLOGY;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CINGULATE GYRUS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINEAR SYSTEM; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NEUROANATOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSOR; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 0037781982     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-2312(02)00821-4     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. S. Baillet, J.C. Mosher, R.M. Leahy, Electromagnetic brain mapping, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 18 (6) (2001) 14-30.
2. D.A. Boas, et al., Imaging the body with diffuse optical tomography, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 18 (6) (2001) 57-75.
3. M.G.H. Coles, M.D. Rugg, Event-related brain potentials: an introduction, in: M.D. Rugg, M.G.H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of Mind, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995.
4. S. Dehaene, M. Posner, D. Tucker, Localization of a neural system for error detection and compensation, Psychol. Sci. 5 (1994) 303-305.
5. R. Duda, P. Hart, D. Stork, Pattern Classification, Wiley, New York, 2001.
6. M. Falkenstein, J. Hoorman, S. Christ, J. Hohnsbein, ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial, Biol. Psychol. 51 (2000) 87-107.
7. S. Haykin, Adaptive Filter Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996.
8. S. Makeig, A. Bell, T. Jung, T. Sejnowski, Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic data, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 8, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996, pp. 145-151.
9. G. Pfurtscheller, C. Neuper, Motor imagery and direct brain-computer communication, Proc. IEEE 89 (7) (2001) 1123-1134.
10. H. Ramoser, J. Mueller-Gerking, G. Pfurtscheller, Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement, IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng. 8 (4) (2000) 441-446.
11. G. Schalk, J. Wolpaw, D. McFarland, G. Pfurtscheller, EEG-based communication: presence of an error potential, Clin. Neurophysiol. 111 (2000) 2138-2144.
12. J.A. Swets, ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques, Invest. Radiol. 14 (1979) 109-121.
13. A. Tang, B. Pearlmutter, D. Phung, S. Carter, Independent components of magnetoencephalography, Part I: Localization, Neural Comput. 14 (8) (2002) 1827-1858.
14. R. Vigario, J. Sarela, V. Jousmaki, M. Hamalainen, E. Oja, Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG and MEG recordings, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47 (5) (2000) 589-593.