Recent advances in characterization of vadose zone Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids (DNAPL) in heterogeneous media

Environmental and Engineering Geoscience

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 25-36

  Rossabi, Joe ^a   Riha, Brian D ^a   Eddy Dilek, C A ^a   Looney, Brian B ^a   Hyde, W Keith ^a  

^a WESTINGHOUSE SAVANNAH RIVER COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Characterization; Cone penetrometer; Dense non aqueous phase liquids; Penetrometer test; Perchloroethylene; Soil sampling; Wireline

Indexed keywords

NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID; POLLUTION; SAMPLING; SOIL; TESTING;

CONE PENETRATION TEST; NONAQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID; SAMPLING; SOIL TEST; VADOSE ZONE;

EID: 0037768484     PISSN: 10787275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2113/9.1.25     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. BREWSTER, M. L.; ANNAN, A. P.; GREENHOUSE, J. P.; KUEPER, B. H.; OLHOEFT, G. R.; REDMAN, J. D.; AND SANDER, K. A., 1995, Observed migration of a controlled DNAPL release by geophysical methods: Ground Water, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 977-987.
2. BROHOLM, K. AND FEENSTRA, S., 1995, Laboratory measurements of the aqueous solubility of mixtures of chlorinated solvents: Environmental Toxicology Chemistry, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 9-15.
3. CHRISTY, T., 1996, Driveable permeable membrane sensor for the detection of volatile compounds in soil, in Proceedings of the National Ground Water Association 10th Outdoor Action Conference, Las Vegas, NV: National Ground Water Association, Dublin, OH, pp. 169-178.
4. COHEN, R. M. AND MERCER, J. W., 1993, DNAPL Site Evaluation: C. K. Smoley-CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
5. EDDY-DILEK, C. A.; RIHA, B. D.; JACKSON, D.; AND ROSSABI, J., 1999, DNAPL source zone characterization of Launch Complex 34, Cape Canaveral Air Station, Florida: Technical Report WSRC- TR-99-00024, Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC.
6. FARRINGTON, S. P.; GILDEA, M. L.; AND BIANCHI, J. C., 1999, Development of a wireline CPT system for multiple tool usage, in Proceedings of the 1999 Industry Partnerships to Deploy Environmental Technology Conference, Morgantown, WV: National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.
7. FEENSTRA, S.; MACKAY, D. M.; AND CHERRY, J. A., 1991, A method for assessing residual NAPL based on organic chemical concentrations in soil samples: Ground Water Monitoring Review, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 128-136.
8. HEWITT, A., 1998, Comparison of sample preparation methods for the analysis of volatile organic compounds in soil samples: Solvent extraction vs. vapor partitioning: Environmental Science Technology, Vol. 32, pp. 143-149.
9. HEWITT, A. D., 1999, Storage and preservation of soil samples for volatile compound analysis: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Special Report 99-5.
10. JIN, M.; DELSHAD, M.; DWARAKANATH, V.; MCKINNEY, D. C.; POPE, G. A.; SEPEHRNOORI, K.; TILBURG, C.; AND JACKSON, R. E., 1995, Partitioning tracer test for detection, estimation and remediation performance assessment of subsurface nonaqueous phase liquids: Water Resources Research, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 1201-1211.
11. KELLER, C.; ROSSABI, J.; RIHA, B. D.; WALKER, J.; NASHOLD, B.; AND WERENKO, P., 2000. Utility of flexible liners installed via push rods, in Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Integrated Approaches to Site Characterization. Chicago, IL.
12. KRAM, M., 1998, Use of SCAPS petroleum hydrocarbon sensor technology for real-time indirect DNAPL detection: Journal Soil Contamination, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 73-86.
13. LIEBERMAN, S. H. AND KNOWLES, D. S., 1998, Cone penetrometer deployable in situ video microscope for characterizing subsurface soil properties: Field Analytical Chemistry Technology. Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 127-132.
14. LOONEY, B. B. AND FALTA, R. W. (Editors). 2000, Vadose Zone Science and Technology Solutions: Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, 1540 p.
15. LUNNE, T., ROBERTSON, P. K.; AND POWELL, J. J. M., 1997, Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice: Blackie Academic and Professional, London.
16. MARINER, P. E.; JIN, M.; AND JACKSON, R. E., 1997, An algorithm for the estimation of NAPL saturation and composition from typical soil chemical analyses: Ground Water Monitoring Remediation, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 122-129.
17. MARINER, P. E.; JIN, M.; STUDER, J. E.; AND POPE, G. A., 1999, The first vadose zone partitioning interwell tracer test for nonaqueous phase liquid and water residual: Environmental Science Technology, Vol. 33, pp. 2825-2828.
18. OLHOEFT, G. R., 1992, Geophysical detection of hydrocarbon and organic chemical contamination, in Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems. Chicago, IL, pp. 587-595.
19. RIHA, B. D.; ROSSABI, J.; EDDY-DILEK, C. A.; AND JACKSON, D., 2000. DNAPL characterization using the Ribbon NAPL Sampler: Methods and results, in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Vol. C2-2, Monterey, CA: Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, pp. 33-40.
20. ROSSABI, J. AND NAVE, S. E., 1998, Characterization of DNAPL using flourescence techniques (U): Technical Report WSRC-TR-98- 00125. Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Aiken, SC.
21. ROSSABI, J.; RIHA, B. D.; HAAS, J. W. III: EDDY-DILEK, C. A.; LUSTIG KREEGER, A. G.; CARRABBA, M.; HYDE, W. K.; AND BELLO, J., 2000a, Field tests of a DNAPL characterization system using cone penetrometer-based Raman spectroscopy: Ground Water Monitoring Remediation, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 72-81.
22. ROSSABI, J.; LOONEY, B. B.; EDDY-DILEK, C. A.; RIHA, B. D.; AND JACKSON, D. G., 2000b, DNAPL site characterization: The evolving conceptual model and toolbox approach, in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Vol. C2-2, Monterey, CA: Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, pp. 41-48.
23. VOICE, T. C. AND KOLB, B., 1993, Static and dynamic headspace analysis of volatile organic compounds in soils: Environmental Science Technology, Vol. 27, pp. 709-713.
24. WEST, O.; SIEGRIST, R. L.; MITCHELL, T. J.; AND JENKINS, R. A., 1995, Measurement error and spatial variability effects on characterization of volatile organics in the subsurface: Environmental Science Technology, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 647-656.