Cytotoxicity of DMSO for MRC5, Chang Liver and CV1 cells evaluated in vitro by LK, MTT and NR assays;Cytotoksyczność DMSO DLA komórek MRC5, Chang Liver I CV1 oznaczana in vitro metodami LK, MTT I NR

Medycyna Doswiadczalna i Mikrobiologia

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 157-164

  Siennicka, Joanna ^a   Gut, Włodzimierz ^a   Zuk, Anna ^a   Litwińska, Bogumiła ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HYGIENE   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE; MITOCHONDRIAL ENZYME; NEUTRAL RED; OXIDOREDUCTASE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; ASSAY; CELL COUNT; COLORIMETRY; CYTOTOXICITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; LIVER CELL; NONHUMAN; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ANIMALS; CELL COUNT; CELL LINE; COLORIMETRY; COLORING AGENTS; DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE; HUMANS; MITOCHONDRIA; NEUTRAL RED; OXIDOREDUCTASES;

EID: 0037766780     PISSN: 00258601     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Al-Rubeai M. MTT assay. W: Cell and tissue culture: labo ratory procedures. Red. A Doyle, JB Griffiths, DG Newell. Wiley, 1996, 4B:6.
2. Bondesson I, Ekwall B, Hellberg S i inni. MEIC - a new international multicenter project to evaluate the relevance to human toxicity of in vitro cytotoxicity tests. Cell Biol Toxicol 1989; 5: 331-47.
3. Borenfreund E, Babich H. Neutral Red (NR) assay. W: Cell and tissue culture: laboratory procedures. Red. A Doyle, JB Griffiths, DG Newell. Wiley, 1996, 4B:7.
4. Cinelli S, Falezza A, Meli C i inni. Alternative methods in toxicology tests: in vitro toxicity. Cytotechnology 1991; Suppl 1: 51-54.
5. Clynes M, Martin A, Dooley M. Miniaturized colorimetric methods for determining cell number. W: Cell and tissue culture: laboratory procedures. Red. A Doyle, JB Griffiths, DG Newell. Wiley, 1996, 4B:5.
6. Evaluation, validation and implementation of new microbiological testing methods. Technical Report no. 33. PDA J Pharm Science Technol 2000; 54: 2-39.
7. Forsby A. In vitro toxicity: mechanisms, alternatives and validation - a report the 19th annual scientific meeting of the Scandinavian Society for Cell Toxicology. Altern Lab Anim 2002; 30: 307-308.
8. Goldberg AM, Frazier JM, Brusick D i inni. Framework for validation and implementation of in vitro toxicity tests. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 1993; 29A: 688-92.
9. Grie P, Koronkiewicz M, Skierski JS. Cytostatic and cytotoxic effects of (E)-2′-(fluoromethylene)-cytydine on solid tumor and a leukemia cell line. Acta Biochim Pol 2000; 47: 165-71.
10. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 1983; 65: 55-63.
11. Putnam KP, Bombick DW, Doolittle DJ. Evaluation of eight in vitro assays for assessing the cytotoxicity of cigarette smoke condensate. Toxicol In Vitro 2002; 16: 599-607.
12. Riddell RJ, Pancer DS, Wilde SM i inni. The importance of exposure period and cell type in in vitro cytotoxicity tests. ATLA 1986; 14: 86-92.
13. Sawicki W, Kieler J, Briand P. Vital staining with neutral red and trypan blue of 3H-thymidine-labeled cells prior to autoradiography. Stain Technol 1967; 42: 143-46.
14. Spielmann H, Liebsch M. Validation successes: chemicals. Alter Lab Anim 2002; Suppl 2: 33-40.
15. Vistica DT, Skehan P, Scudiero D i inni. Tetrazolium-based assays for cellular viability: a critical examination of selected parameters affecting formazan production. Cancer Res 1991; 51: 2515-20.
16. West C. Colony-forming efficency. W: Cell and tissue culture: laboratory procedures. Red. A Doyle, JB Griffiths, DG Newell, Wiley, 1996, 4B:3.