A novel data calibration scheme for electrical impedance tomography

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 421-435

  Soni, Nirmal K ^a   Dehghani, Hamid ^a   Hartov, Alex ^a   Paulsen, Keith D ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

3D effects; Agar phantoms; Boundary layer; Data calibration; Electrical impedance tomography

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY LAYERS; CALIBRATION; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENT; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; PHANTOMS; POLYSACCHARIDES; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

'CURRENT; 3D EFFECTS; AGAR PHANTOM; BOUNDARY DATA; CALIBRATION SCHEMES; DATA CALIBRATION; ELECTRICAL IMPE DANCE TOMOGRAPHY (EIT); IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHM; MEASUREMENTS OF; PHANTOMS;

ALGAE;

ALGORITHM; ARTIFACT; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0037762998     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/24/2/354     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Barber D C and Brown B H 1984 Applied potential tomography J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 17 723-33
2. Barber D C, Brown B H and Avis N J 1992 Image reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography using filtered back projection Proc. Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Soc. pp 1691-2
3. Cheney M, Isaacson D, Newell J, Simske S and Goble J 1990 NOSER: an algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 2 66-75
4. Cherepenin V, Karpov A, Koljenevsky A, Kornienko V, Mazalestskaya A, Mazourov D and Meister D 2001 A 3D electrical impedance tomography system for breast cancer detection Physiol. Meas. 22 9-18
5. Dehghani H, Pogue B W, Poplack S P and Paulsen K D 2002 Multiwavelength three-dimensional near-infrared tomography of the breast: initial simulation, phantom, and clinical results Appl. Opt. 42 135-45
6. Erol R A, Mangnall Y, Leathard A D, Smallwood R H, Brown B H, Cherian P and Bardhan K D 1995 Identifying oesophageal contents using electrical impedance tomography Physiol. Meas. 16 253-61
7. Hoetink A E, Faes Th J C, Marcus J T, Kerkkamp H J J and Heethaar R M 2001 Imaging of thoracic blood volume changes during the heart cycle with electrical impedance using a linear spot-electrode array IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21 653-61
8. Holder D 1992 Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) of brain function Brain Tomogr. 5 87-93
9. Isaacson D 1986 Distinguishability of conductivities by electric current computed tomography IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 5 91-5
10. Kerner T E 2001 Electrical impedance tomography for breast imaging PhD Thesis Dartmouth College
11. Kerner T E, Paulsen K D, Hartov A, Soho S K and Poplack S P 2002a Electrical impedance spectroscopy of the breast: clinical results in 26 subjects IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21 638-45
12. Kerner T E, Paulsen K D, Soni N and Hartov A 2002b Electrical impedance imaging with electrode models: initial in vivo experience in the breast IEEE Int. Syrup. on Biomedical Imaging (Washington, DC) pp 1043-6
13. Newell J C, Isaacson D, Saulnier G J, Cheney M and Gisser D G 1993 Acute pulmonary edema assessed by electrical impedance tomography Proc. Ann. Int. Conf IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Soc. pp 92-3
14. Paulsen K D and Jiang H 1997 An enhanced electrical impedance imaging algorithm for hyperthermia applications J. Hyperthermia 13 459-80
15. Paulsen K D, Moskowitz K M and Ryan T P 1994 Temperature field estimation using electrical impedance profiling methods: 1. Reconstruction algorithm and simulated results Int. J. Hyperthermia 10 209-28
16. Polydorides N P and Lionheart W R B 2002 A MATLAB toolkit for three dimensional electrical impedance tomography: a contribution to the EIDORS project Meas. Sci. Technol. 13 1871-83
17. Somersalo E, Cheney M and Isaacson D 1992 Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electrical current computed tomography SIAM J. Appl. Math. 52 1023-40