Multivariate description of comparison matrices

Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 112-126

  Laslier, Jean François ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE CERGY PONTOISE   (France)

Author keywords

Majority; Pairwise comparisons; Principal components; Tournament

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037761502     PISSN: 10579214     EISSN: 10991360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199606)5:2<112::AID-MCDA98>3.0.CO;2-K     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anderson, T. W., An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, New York:Wiley, 1984.
2. Artin, E., Geometric Algebra, New York:Interscience, 1957.
3. Aupetit, B., and Genest, C., ‘On some useful properties of the Perron eigenvalue of a positive reciprocal matrix in the context of the analytic hierarchy process’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 70, 263-268(1993).
4. Berge, C., Graphes et Hypergraphes, Paris:Dunod, 1970.
5. David, H. A., The Method of Paired Comparisons, London:Charles Griffin, 1963.
6. Fishburn, P. C., ‘Social choice functions’, SIAM Rev., 16, 63-90(1974).
7. Fishburn, P. C., ‘Condorcet social choice functions’, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 33, 469-489(1977).
8. Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., ‘Analyse des préférences’, in Bouroche, J. M. (ed.), Analyse des Données en Marketing, Paris:Masson, 1977, pp. 63-97.
9. Kemeny, J., ‘Mathematics without numbers’, Daedalus, 88, 571-591(1959).
10. Kendall, M. G., and Smith, B. B., ‘On the method of paired comparisons’, Biometrika, 31, 324-345(1940).
11. Kerner, J., ‘The Perron-Frobenius theorem and the ranking of football teams’, SIAM Rev., 35, 80-93(1993).
12. Laffond, G., Lainé, J., and Laslier, J. F., ‘Composition consistency of choice functions and tournament solutions’, Social Choice Welf., 13, 75-93(1996).
13. Levchenkov, V. S., ‘Social choice theory: a new insight’, Preprint Institute for System Analysis, Moscow, 1992.
14. Marcotorchino, J. F., and Michaud, P., Optimisation en Analyse Ordinale des Données, Paris:Masson, 1979.
15. Maybee, J. S., and Pullman, N. J., ‘Tournament matrices and their generalization, I’, Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 28, 57-70(1990).
16. Monjardet, B., ‘An axiomatic theory of tournament aggregation’, Math. Oper. Res.3, 334-351(1978).
17. Moon, J. W., Topics on Tournaments, New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
18. Moon, J. W., and Pullman, N. J., ‘On generalized tournament matrices’, SIAM Rev.12, 384-399(1970).
19. Moulin, H., ‘Choosing from a tournament’, Social Choice Welf., 3, 271-291(1983).
20. Perny, P., and Roy, B., ‘The use of fuzzy outranking relations in preference modelling’, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 49, 33-53(1992).
21. Reid, K. B., and Beineke, L. W., ‘Tournaments’, in Beineke, L. W. and Reid, K. B. (eds), Selected Topics in Graph Theory, Academic, 1978, pp. 169-204.
22. Roubens, M., and Vincke, Ph., Preference Modelling, Berlin:Springer, 1985.
23. Roy, B., and Bouyssou, D., Aide Mulicritère à la Décision: Méthodes et Cas, Paris:Economica, 1992.
24. Saaty, D. G., Geometry of Voting, Berlin:Springer, 1994.
25. Saaty, T., ‘A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures’, J. Math. Psychol., 15, 234-281(1977).
26. Seber, G. A., Multivariate Observations, New York:Wiley, 1984.
27. Slater, P., ‘Inconsistencies in a schedule of paired comparisons’, Biometrika, 48, 303-212(1961).
28. Vincke, Ph., ‘Vrais, quasi, pseudo et précritères dans un ensemble fini: propiétés et algorithmes’, Cah. LAMSADE 27, Université de Paris-Dauphine, 1980.
29. Volle, M., Analyse des Données, Paris:Economica, 1981.
30. Young, H. P., ‘Condorcet’s theory of voting’, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev.82, 1231-1244(1988).
31. Young, H. P., and Levenglick, A., ‘A consistent extension of Condorcet’s election principle’, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 35, 285-300(1978).